Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; Cardiovascular Research Unit, Fondazione Sacco, Forlì, Italy.
Cardiology Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;329:234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.057. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
Right ventricle-pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAC) has emerged from pathophysiology to clinical interest for prognostic implication in heart failure and is commonly measured as the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/SPAP). However, feasibility of SPAP is limited (down to 60% in trials, and maybe lower in clinical practice). We ought to assess the prognostic value of the TAPSE times pulmonary acceleration time (TAPSE x pACT) product and TAPSE to peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TAPSE/TRV) ratio as new alternative measures of RVPAC.
Two-hundred patients hospitalized with heart failure were followed-up (median time of 2.7 years) and 82 died. Non survivors had significantly lower TAPSE/SPAP, TAPSE x pACT and TAPSE/TRV than survivors (0.31 vs 0.40 mm/mmHg, 130 vs 156 cm·ms, 5.0 vs 5.8 ms, respectively). Four multivariate models were performed, each one including TAPSE, TAPSE/SPAP, TAPSE x pACT or TAPSE/TRV. TAPSE/SPAP resulted the most powerful predictor of mortality (HR 0.74 per mm/mmHg increase, P < 0.001, C-Statistic 0.778), followed by TAPSE x pACT (HR 0.95 per 10 cm·ms increase, P = 0.013, C-Statistic 0.776), TAPSE/TRV (HR 0.76 per ms increase, P < 0.001, C-Statistic 0.774) and TAPSE (HR 0.91 per mm increase, P = 0.003, C-Statistic 0.769). Cutoff values of 140 cm·ms and 5.5 ms were respectively identified for TAPSE x pACT and TAPSE/TRV with receiving operating characteristic analysis for mortality.
TAPSE x pACT product and TAPSE/TRV ratio are alternative measures of RVPAC for prognostic assessment in heart failure that can be applied if TAPSE/SPAP is not feasible.
右心室-肺动脉偶联(RVPAC)从病理生理学发展到临床关注,因其对心力衰竭的预后具有重要意义,通常通过三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移与收缩期肺动脉压的比值(TAPSE/SPAP)进行测量。然而,SPAP 的可行性有限(试验中低至 60%,临床实践中可能更低)。我们应该评估 TAPSE 与肺动脉加速度时间(TAPSE×pACT)乘积和 TAPSE 与三尖瓣反流峰值速度(TAPSE/TRV)比值的预后价值,作为 RVPAC 的新替代测量指标。
对 200 例因心力衰竭住院的患者进行随访(中位时间为 2.7 年),其中 82 例死亡。与存活者相比,非幸存者的 TAPSE/SPAP、TAPSE×pACT 和 TAPSE/TRV 显著降低(0.31 比 0.40mm/mmHg、130 比 156cm·ms、5.0 比 5.8ms)。进行了四个多变量模型,每个模型均包含 TAPSE、TAPSE/SPAP、TAPSE×pACT 或 TAPSE/TRV。TAPSE/SPAP 是死亡率的最强预测因子(每增加 1mm/mmHg,HR 为 0.74,P<0.001,C 统计量为 0.778),其次是 TAPSE×pACT(每增加 10cm·ms,HR 为 0.95,P=0.013,C 统计量为 0.776)、TAPSE/TRV(每增加 1ms,HR 为 0.76,P<0.001,C 统计量为 0.774)和 TAPSE(每增加 1mm,HR 为 0.91,P=0.003,C 统计量为 0.769)。通过接受者操作特征分析,确定 TAPSE×pACT 和 TAPSE/TRV 的截断值分别为 140cm·ms 和 5.5ms,用于预测死亡率。
TAPSE×pACT 乘积和 TAPSE/TRV 比值是 RVPAC 的替代预后评估指标,在 TAPSE/SPAP 不可行时可用于心力衰竭的预后评估。