Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York, NY, USA.
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York, NY, USA.
Contraception. 2021 Mar;103(3):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
OBJECTIVE(S): Telemedicine for medication abortion (teleMAB) is safe and effective, yet little is known about how its introduction affects service delivery. We assessed changes in service delivery patterns 1 year after introducing teleMAB at Planned Parenthood in 2 U.S. states.
Retrospective records analysis using electronic health record data from Planned Parenthood health centers in Montana and Nevada from 2015 to 2018. We included all patients receiving medication or aspiration abortion in the year before and after introducing site-to-site teleMAB. Outcomes included: the proportion of medication abortions (vs. aspiration); gestational age at abortion; time to appointment; and distance traveled. We compared outcomes pre- and postimplementation using χ, t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.
We analyzed data for 3,038 abortions: 1,314 pre- and 1,724 postimplementation. In Montana, the proportion of medication abortions increased postimplementation (60% vs. 65%, p = 0.04). Mean gestational age was similar: 58 versus 57 days (p = 0.35). Mean time to appointment decreased (14 vs. 12 days, p < 0.0001), as did one-way distance traveled by patients (134 vs. 115 miles, p = 0.03). In Nevada, where Planned Parenthood only provided medication abortion, total medication abortions increased (461 vs. 735). Mean gestational age remained stable (51 vs. 51 days, p = 0.33), as did time to appointment (8 vs. 8 days, p = 0.76). Mean one-way distance traveled was 47 miles in the preperiod versus 34 miles in the postperiod (p = 0.22).
CONCLUSION(S): Medication abortion increased after the introduction of telemedicine in both states, though we cannot account for abortions performed by other providers. Telemedicine has the potential to improve access to medication abortion.
Telemedicine has the potential to improve or maintain access to medication abortion and should be taken to scale where feasible. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate or reverse policy restrictions on telemedicine for medication abortion.
远程医疗药物流产(teleMAB)是安全有效的,但对于其引入后如何影响服务提供,人们知之甚少。我们评估了在 2 个美国州的计划生育组织引入远程医疗药物流产后 1 年服务提供模式的变化。
使用蒙大拿州和内华达州计划生育组织健康中心的电子健康记录数据进行回顾性记录分析,时间范围为 2015 年至 2018 年。我们纳入了在引入站点间远程医疗药物流产前后一年内接受药物或抽吸流产的所有患者。结果包括:药物流产(vs. 抽吸)的比例;流产时的孕龄;预约时间;以及旅行距离。我们使用 χ2、t 检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较实施前后的结果。
我们分析了 3038 例流产的数据:实施前 1314 例,实施后 1724 例。在蒙大拿州,药物流产的比例在实施后增加(60% vs. 65%,p=0.04)。平均孕龄相似:58 天对 57 天(p=0.35)。预约时间缩短(14 天对 12 天,p<0.0001),患者单程旅行距离也缩短(134 英里对 115 英里,p=0.03)。在内华达州,计划生育组织仅提供药物流产,总药物流产增加(461 例对 735 例)。平均孕龄保持稳定(51 天对 51 天,p=0.33),预约时间也保持稳定(8 天对 8 天,p=0.76)。在前期,单程旅行距离为 47 英里,而在后期为 34 英里(p=0.22)。
在两个州引入远程医疗后,药物流产都有所增加,但我们无法说明其他提供者进行的流产。远程医疗有可能改善药物流产的可及性。
远程医疗有可能改善或维持药物流产的可及性,在可行的情况下应扩大规模。需要继续努力减轻或扭转对远程医疗药物流产的政策限制。