• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同资产信托以多种规模有效地管理自然资本和生态系统服务。

Common asset trusts to effectively steward natural capital and ecosystem services at multiple scales.

机构信息

Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

The ProSocial Institute, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111801. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111801. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111801
PMID:33360256
Abstract

Ecosystems (natural capital) produce a range of benefits to humans. Natural capital is best thought of as common property since many of the ecosystem services it helps produce are non-rival and/or non-excludable. Private property regimes and markets alone are ineffective and inappropriate institutions to manage them sustainably. These systems can be better managed as commons, using more nuanced private and community property rights and Common Asset Trusts (CATs), with legal precedent in the Public Trust Doctrine. Effective CATs embody a generalized version of Elinore Ostrom's eight core design principles for sustainable commons management: (1) shared identity and purpose; (2) equitable distribution of contributions and benefits; (3) fair and inclusive decision-making; (4) monitoring agreed behaviours; (5) graduated responses; (6) fast and fair conflict resolution; (7) authority to self-govern; and (8) collaborative relations with other groups and spatial scales. Here, we describe a few existing and proposed systems that approximate effective CATs. We also suggest how Costa Rica can transform its existing payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme into a national CAT. Finally, we describe how CATs can facilitate more fair and effective public/private partnerships (PPPs) to invest in natural capital and ecosystem services.

摘要

生态系统(自然资本)为人类提供了一系列益处。自然资本最好被视为共有财产,因为它所帮助产生的许多生态系统服务是非竞争性和/或不可排他性的。仅靠私有财产制度和市场是无效和不适当的管理可持续发展的机构。这些系统可以作为共有资源更好地管理,使用更细致的私有和社区产权以及共同资产信托(CAT),这在公共信托原则中具有法律先例。有效的 CAT 体现了埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆(Elinore Ostrom)可持续共有资源管理的八项核心设计原则的广义版本:(1)共同的身份和目的;(2)公平分配贡献和利益;(3)公平包容的决策;(4)监测商定的行为;(5)渐进的反应;(6)快速公正的冲突解决;(7)自治权;(8)与其他团体和空间尺度的合作关系。在这里,我们描述了一些现有的和拟议的系统,这些系统近似于有效的 CAT。我们还建议哥斯达黎加如何将其现有的生态系统服务支付(PES)计划转变为国家 CAT。最后,我们描述了 CAT 如何促进更公平和有效的公私合作伙伴关系(PPP),以投资于自然资本和生态系统服务。

相似文献

1
Common asset trusts to effectively steward natural capital and ecosystem services at multiple scales.共同资产信托以多种规模有效地管理自然资本和生态系统服务。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111801. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111801. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Emergent sustainability in open property regimes.开放性财产制度中的紧急可持续性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 18;115(51):12859-12867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812028115. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice.为决策提供信息的自然资本与生态系统服务:从承诺到实践。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7348-55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112.
4
Governance and the mangrove commons: Advancing the cross-scale, nested framework for the global conservation and wise use of mangroves.治理与红树林公地:推进全球红树林保护与合理利用的跨尺度嵌套框架
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jun 15;312:114823. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114823. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Nature as capital: Advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs.自然即资本:在美国联邦政策与项目中推进并纳入生态系统服务
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7383-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420500112.
6
Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.哥斯达黎加的环境服务付费计划:意图、实施与影响。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Oct;21(5):1165-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x.
7
Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis.重视生态系统服务:理论、实践和跨学科综合的需要。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:54-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x.
8
Can conservation contracts co-exist with change? Payment for ecosystem services in the context of adaptive decision-making and sustainability.保护合同能否与变化共存?适应性决策与可持续性背景下的生态系统服务付费。
Environ Manage. 2015 Jan;55(1):69-85. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0380-1. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
9
A novel telecoupling framework to assess social relations across spatial scales for ecosystem services research.一种新的遥耦合框架,用于评估生态系统服务研究中跨空间尺度的社会关系。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jul 1;241:251-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.029. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
10
Governing trade-offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human-wildlife coexistence.权衡生态系统服务和不服务,以实现人类与野生动物共存。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Jun;33(3):543-553. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13241. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructed Wetlands Suitability for Sugarcane Profitability, Freshwater Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.人工湿地对甘蔗盈利性、淡水生物多样性和生态系统服务的适宜性。
Environ Manage. 2023 Feb;71(2):304-320. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01734-4. Epub 2022 Oct 21.