• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估分娩体验问卷(QACE)的西班牙语版本的验证和心理测量特性。

Validation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE).

机构信息

Fundació Sanitària Mollet, Ronda Pinetons 6, Mollet del Vallés, 08100 Barcelona, Spain.

Research Department Centre d'Higiene Mental Les Corts, c/Numància, 103-105 Bajos, 08029 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Feb;27:100584. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584
PMID:33360591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

When evaluating childbirth experience, some of the factors considered by women include their previous births experience, pain management during birth, and companion and healthcare professional support received. The objective of this paper is to validate the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE) into the Spanish population by assessing its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Due to the differences between the Spanish and English languages, a careful translation process was the first step to making the QACE useable to Spanish speaking cohorts, once thoroughly translated their conceptual equivalence was evaluated by a group of experts and tested later via interviews with postpartum women for comprehensibility evaluation. Secondly, the validation process was obtained throughout the factorial analysis, internal consistency, test-retest evaluation and convergent and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

A total of 268 postpartum women participated in the validity study. The KMO (0.84) and Bartlett test (p < 0.001) confirmed the adequacy of factor analysis and the Screen plot showed four factors with the predictive power of 52.63%, which supported total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an adequate/good fitness for the new model (χ/df = 1.47, GFI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.052, CFI = 0.889, NFI = 0.727, NNFI = 0.873, and SRMR = 0.155). Internal consistency was confirmed with McDonal's Omega level of 0.818. Test-retest evaluation supported test stability (r = 0.79, p < 0.01). Convergent and discriminant validity were obtained with 0.803 and 0.475 Pearson coefficients respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish version of QACE is a relevant tool for measuring childbirth experience into the Spanish context with acceptable validity and stability.

摘要

目的

在评估分娩体验时,女性考虑的因素包括以往的分娩经历、分娩过程中的疼痛管理以及获得的伴侣和医护人员支持。本文的目的是通过评估其心理测量特性,将生育经历评估问卷(QACE)验证到西班牙语人群中。

方法

由于西班牙语和英语之间存在差异,因此仔细的翻译过程是使 QACE 能够被西班牙语使用者使用的第一步,一旦经过一组专家评估其概念等价性,就会通过与产后妇女进行访谈来评估其可理解性。其次,通过因子分析、内部一致性、重测评估以及收敛和判别有效性来获得验证过程。

结果

共有 268 名产后妇女参加了有效性研究。KMO(0.84)和巴特利特检验(p<0.001)证实了因子分析的充分性,而屏幕图显示了具有 52.63%预测能力的四个因素,支持总方差。验证性因子分析表明新模型具有适当/良好的拟合度(χ/df=1.47,GFI=0.979,RMSEA=0.052,CFI=0.889,NFI=0.727,NNFI=0.873,SRMR=0.155)。内部一致性通过 McDonal 的 Omega 水平 0.818 得到证实。重测评估支持测试稳定性(r=0.79,p<0.01)。收敛和判别有效性分别为 0.803 和 0.475 Pearson 系数。

结论

QACE 的西班牙语版本是一种在西班牙背景下衡量分娩体验的相关工具,具有可接受的有效性和稳定性。

相似文献

1
Validation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE).评估分娩体验问卷(QACE)的西班牙语版本的验证和心理测量特性。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Feb;27:100584. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.文化调适、验证及评估西班牙文版生育经验问卷 2.0 的心理计量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7.
3
Adaptation of short version of questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE) to the Iranian culture.将评估分娩体验问卷(QACE)短版适应于伊朗文化。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03317-9.
4
The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment.《分娩体验问卷》西班牙语版(CEQ-E):信度与效度评估
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
5
Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0.验证生育经历问卷 2.0 的伊朗版本。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y.
6
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).《产妇分娩体验问卷(CEQ)波斯文版的心理计量学评估》。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 10;2020:6879283. doi: 10.1155/2020/6879283. eCollection 2020.
7
Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study.《中国生育体验问卷(CEQ)的适应性研究:一项多地点横断面研究》。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373. eCollection 2019.
8
Development of a questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE).开发用于评估分娩体验的问卷(QACE)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x.
9
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
10
[Validation of the questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE) in a French population].[法国人群中用于评估分娩体验的问卷(QACE)的验证]
Encephale. 2021 Aug;47(4):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Short Version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE).《评估分娩体验问卷简版(QACE)》土耳其语效度与信度研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;13(14):1743. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141743.
2
Psychometric properties of the questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience in a Chinese sample of postpartum women.用于评估中国产后女性样本分娩体验问卷的心理测量学特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 20;25(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07659-0.
3
Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties.
衡量女性对分娩的满意度:测量属性的文献综述
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 20;63(2):100-108. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Reliability and Validity of General Health Questionnaire-12 in Chinese Dental Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间中文版一般健康问卷-12在中国牙科医护人员中的信效度研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 18;12:792838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.792838. eCollection 2021.