Suppr超能文献

低收入和中等收入国家数字心理健康的兴起:近期进展回顾及其对精神障碍治疗与预防的影响

The emergence of digital mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A review of recent advances and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders.

作者信息

Carter Helena, Araya Ricardo, Anjur Kavya, Deng Davy, Naslund John A

机构信息

The Center for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK.

The Center for Global Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK; Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jan;133:223-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

Abstract

In low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), emerging digital mental health interventions should be accompanied by regular and comprehensive assessment of available scientific evidence. This review aims to support efforts to monitor progress in digital mental health research, ensuring new evidence can guide researchers, clinicians, policymakers and program managers positioned to adopt and implement these digitally-enabled treatments. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, an electronic database search from 2016 to 2020 yielded 37 digital intervention studies for detection, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and/or management of a broad range of mental disorders in 13 LMICs. This date range was selected to update previous reviews. Most studies involved online interventions and many reported feasibility and acceptability, reflected by participant satisfaction or program adherence. About half the studies (N = 23) reported clinical benefits based on changes in mental health. For depression and mood disorders, some digital interventions showed improvements in depressive symptoms, quality of life, treatment adherence, and recovery. However, sample sizes were small and studies focused primarily on adults. Further limiting generalizability was the lack of consistency in clinical assessment and measurement tools between studies. No studies reported worsening symptoms, negative acceptability or dissatisfaction with digital interventions, suggesting possible publication bias. While digital interventions show promise, it remains difficult to conclude that digital interventions are effective from these studies, as it is prudent to exercise caution before drawing conclusions about clinical effectiveness. This review reflects continued growth in digital mental health research in LMICs and further highlights the need for rigorous evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

摘要

在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),新兴的数字心理健康干预措施应伴随对现有科学证据进行定期和全面的评估。本综述旨在支持监测数字心理健康研究进展的工作,确保新证据能够指导研究人员、临床医生、政策制定者和项目管理人员采用和实施这些数字化治疗方法。根据PRISMA指南,对2016年至2020年的电子数据库进行检索,得到了37项关于13个低收入和中等收入国家广泛精神障碍的检测、诊断、预防、治疗和/或管理的数字干预研究。选择这个日期范围是为了更新之前的综述。大多数研究涉及在线干预,许多研究报告了可行性和可接受性,这体现在参与者的满意度或项目依从性上。约一半的研究(N = 23)根据心理健康的变化报告了临床益处。对于抑郁症和情绪障碍,一些数字干预措施显示出抑郁症状、生活质量、治疗依从性和康复方面的改善。然而,样本量较小,且研究主要集中在成年人身上。研究之间临床评估和测量工具缺乏一致性进一步限制了研究结果的普遍性。没有研究报告数字干预措施导致症状恶化、可接受性差或不满意,这表明可能存在发表偏倚。虽然数字干预措施显示出前景,但从这些研究中仍难以得出数字干预措施有效的结论,因为在得出关于临床有效性的结论之前谨慎行事是明智的。本综述反映了低收入和中等收入国家数字心理健康研究的持续增长,并进一步强调了对有效性和成本效益进行严格评估的必要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验