• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of data from dental charts, client interview, and client mail survey.

作者信息

Zapka J G, Stoddard A M, Lubin H

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

出版信息

Med Care. 1988 Jan;26(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198801000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198801000-00003
PMID:3336243
Abstract

Dental records and client survey reports were compared as sources of data for dental research. Further, two forms of the client survey were completed, a mail survey and telephone interview. A random sample of 271 clients of a dental group practice based within a university health service was selected. The Kappa values indicated a reasonable level of agreement of client survey and dental record with regard to the types of services received but no with regard to actual number of visits. Responses to the mail and the telephone versions of the client survey were compared for service satisfaction, hygiene behavior, and attitude and belief variables. Two potential sources of bias: nonrespondent/respondent bias and other response biases, such as acquiescent responses, were detected. The study illustrates the importance of weighing which source of response bias is more crucial to the general validity of a study based on the research questions to be addressed.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of data from dental charts, client interview, and client mail survey.
Med Care. 1988 Jan;26(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198801000-00003.
2
Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.通过邮寄与电话访谈收集的SF-36健康调查问卷规范的成本与质量比较:一项全国性调查的结果
Med Care. 1994 Jun;32(6):551-67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002.
3
Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members.采用电话访谈以减少健康计划成员邮件调查中的无应答偏倚。
Med Care. 2002 Mar;40(3):190-200. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200203000-00003.
4
A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview.三种健康调查方法的成本与数据质量比较:邮寄、电话及个人入户访谈。
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Aug;124(2):317-28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114390.
5
Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.评估社区药房邮件调查的电话随访情况。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2007 Jun;3(2):160-82. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.06.003.
6
Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys.邮件和电话调查中的无应答偏差以及早期应答者与所有应答者的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Aug;120(2):291-301. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113892.
7
A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys.家庭健康调查中邮件、电话和上门访谈策略的比较。
Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):238-45. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.3.238.
8
Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication.随访方法和完整性对胃底折叠术明显临床结局的影响。
Am J Surg. 2003 Aug;186(2):143-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00175-2.
9
Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.在一项随机试验中,对医生进行邮政调查的回复率高于电话访谈。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
10
Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys.邮件和电话调查中不同人群组的回答质量。
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Aug;120(2):302-14. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113893.

引用本文的文献

1
A multimethod investigation including direct observation of 3751 patient visits to 120 dental offices.一项多方法调查,包括对120家牙科诊所的3751次患者就诊进行直接观察。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010 May 26;2:27-39. Print 2010.
2
Overview of methods in economic analyses of behavioral interventions to promote oral health.行为干预促进口腔健康的经济分析方法概述。
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S101-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00236.x.
3
Comparing the quality of referrals of general practitioners with high and average referral rates: an independent panel review.
比较高转诊率和平均转诊率的全科医生的转诊质量:独立小组审查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 May;40(334):178-81.