Wang Tao, Wang Wanxiang, Zhang Jinfu, Yang Xianwei, Shen Shu, Wang Wentao
Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and Splenic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 9;10:598433. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598433. eCollection 2020.
To establish a nomogram based on preoperative laboratory study variables using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression for differentiating combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).
We performed a retrospective analysis of iCCA and cHCC patients who underwent liver resection. Blood signatures were established using LASSO regression, and then, the clinical risk factors based on the multivariate logistic regression and blood signatures were combined to establish a nomogram for a differential preoperative diagnosis between iCCA and cHCC. The differential accuracy ability of the nomogram was determined by Harrell's index (C-index) and decision curve analysis, and the results were validated using a validation set. Furthermore, patients were categorized into two groups according to the optimal cut-off values of the nomogram-based scores, and their survival differences were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves.
A total of 587 patients who underwent curative liver resection for iCCA or cHCC between January 2008 and December 2017 at West China Hospital were enrolled in this study. The cHCC score was based on the personalized levels of the seven laboratory study variables. On multivariate logistic analysis, the independent factors for distinguishing cHCC were age, sex, biliary duct stones, and portal hypertension, all of which were incorporated into the nomogram combined with the cHCC-score. The nomogram had a good discriminating capability, with a C-index of 0.796 (95% CI, 0.752-0.840). The calibration plot for distinguishing cHCC from iCCA showed optimal agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observation in the training and validation sets. The decision curves indicated significant clinical usefulness.
The nomogram showed good accuracy for the differential diagnosis between iCCA and cHCC preoperatively, and therapeutic decisions would improve if it was applied in clinical practice.
利用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归,基于术前实验室检查变量建立列线图,以鉴别肝内胆管癌(iCCA)与肝内胆管癌合并肝细胞癌(cHCC)。
我们对接受肝切除术的iCCA和cHCC患者进行了回顾性分析。使用LASSO回归建立血液标志物,然后将基于多因素逻辑回归的临床危险因素与血液标志物相结合,建立用于iCCA和cHCC术前鉴别诊断的列线图。通过Harrell指数(C指数)和决策曲线分析确定列线图的鉴别准确性,并使用验证集对结果进行验证。此外,根据基于列线图评分的最佳临界值将患者分为两组,并使用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估其生存差异。
本研究纳入了2008年1月至2017年12月在华西医院接受iCCA或cHCC根治性肝切除术的587例患者。cHCC评分基于七个实验室检查变量的个体化水平。在多因素逻辑分析中,区分cHCC的独立因素为年龄、性别、胆管结石和门静脉高压,所有这些因素均与cHCC评分一起纳入列线图。该列线图具有良好的鉴别能力,C指数为0.796(95%CI,0.752 - 0.840)。区分cHCC和iCCA的校准图显示,在训练集和验证集中,列线图预测与实际观察之间具有最佳一致性。决策曲线表明其具有显著的临床实用性。
该列线图在术前对iCCA和cHCC的鉴别诊断中显示出良好的准确性,若应用于临床实践,治疗决策将得到改善。