• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对专科药房服务的偏好:中国的一项陈述偏好离散选择实验

Patient Preferences For Specialty Pharmacy Services: A Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Experiment in China.

作者信息

Hu Qinyuan, Hu Haiyao, Hu Ming, Yang Yumei, Wu Zhiang, Zhou Naitong

机构信息

West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;8:597389. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.597389. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.597389
PMID:33363089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7755860/
Abstract

To survey, analyze, and ascertain the preferences for specialty pharmacy services among patients requiring complex care and to provide evidence to support specialty pharmacy service decision-making in China. To identify essential service attributes and levels, a review of the literature, discussions with specialty pharmacy managers and a pilot questionnaire were conducted. A D-efficient fractional factorial design was used to generate the discrete-choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire. A face-to-face survey of patients with chronic illness and their families or friends was conducted at three specialty pharmacies in Chengdu and Qingdao, China. A mixed logit model was used for estimation. Six relevant attributes were identified and incorporated into the DCE questionnaire. A total of 417 participants completed the survey (mean age 43 years, 45.1% males), and 32.1% had lung cancer. The conditional relative importance showed that the most critical attribute was "frequency of telephone follow-up to monitor adverse drug reactions (ADRs), "followed by "mode of drug delivery," "provider of medication guidance services," and "availability of medical insurance consultation"; the least important attribute was "business hours." A 1 min increase in time spent led to a 0.73% decrease in the probability that a service profile would be chosen. Negative preferences were noted for ADR monitoring by telephone follow-up once a year (β = -0.23, < 0.001) and business hours [8:30-20:00 (Monday to Friday), 8:30-17:30 (weekend)] (β = -0.12, < 0.001). Compared with women, men had a higher preference for service monitoring ADRs once every 3 months. Preference measurements showed that "frequency of telephone follow-up to monitor ADRs" had the most critical impact on decisions, followed by "mode of drug delivery." Specialty pharmacies in China need to take these findings into account to improve their design to increase uptake and patient loyalty.

摘要

调查、分析并确定需要复杂护理的患者对专科药房服务的偏好,并为中国专科药房服务决策提供证据支持。为确定基本服务属性和水平,进行了文献综述、与专科药房经理的讨论以及初步问卷调查。采用D - 最优分数析因设计生成离散选择实验(DCE)问卷。在中国成都和青岛的三家专科药房对慢性病患者及其家人或朋友进行了面对面调查。使用混合逻辑模型进行估计。确定了六个相关属性并纳入DCE问卷。共有417名参与者完成了调查(平均年龄43岁,男性占45.1%),32.1%患有肺癌。条件相对重要性表明,最关键的属性是“监测药物不良反应(ADR)的电话随访频率”,其次是“药物配送方式”“用药指导服务提供者”和“医疗保险咨询的可获得性”;最不重要的属性是“营业时间”。时间花费每增加1分钟,服务配置文件被选择的概率就降低0.73%。对于每年通过电话随访监测一次ADR(β = -0.23,<0.001)和营业时间[8:30 - 20:00(周一至周五),8:30 - 17:30(周末)](β = -0.12,<0.001)存在负面偏好。与女性相比,男性对每三个月监测一次ADR的服务偏好更高。偏好测量表明,“监测ADR的电话随访频率”对决策的影响最为关键,其次是“药物配送方式”。中国的专科药房需要考虑这些结果来改进其设计,以提高使用率和患者忠诚度。

相似文献

1
Patient Preferences For Specialty Pharmacy Services: A Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Experiment in China.患者对专科药房服务的偏好:中国的一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;8:597389. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.597389. eCollection 2020.
2
Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for community pharmacy-led Medicare Part D consultation services: A discrete choice experiment.患者对社区药房主导的医疗保险D部分咨询服务的偏好和支付意愿:一项离散选择实验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 May;19(5):764-772. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
3
Managing Minor Ailments; The Public's Preferences for Attributes of Community Pharmacies. A Discrete Choice Experiment.管理小病;公众对社区药房属性的偏好。一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152257. eCollection 2016.
4
Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®).葡萄牙药房与基层医疗合作管理高血压和高血脂模式的患者偏好和成本效益:一项伴随试验的离散选择实验(USFarmácia®)。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292308. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.患者对社区药店哮喘服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):961-76. doi: 10.2165/11594350-000000000-00000.
6
Patient preferences for objective quality metrics during community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment.患者在选择社区药店时对客观质量指标的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):641-649. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Will the Public Engage with New Pharmacy Roles? Assessing Future Uptake of a Community Pharmacy Health Check Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.公众会接受新的药剂师角色吗?使用离散选择实验评估社区药房健康检查的未来采用情况。
Patient. 2022 Jul;15(4):473-483. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00566-4. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
8
Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study.美国患者对通过社区药房提供医疗服务的偏好:一项离散选择研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Dec;42(6):738-749. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12574. Epub 2017 Jun 18.
9
A Study of Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Western China: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.中国西部非小细胞肺癌患者治疗偏好的研究:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;9:653450. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653450. eCollection 2021.
10
Conjoint analysis of patient preferences on Medicare medication therapy management.医疗保险药物治疗管理中患者偏好的联合分析。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011 May-Jun;51(3):378-87. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2011.10039.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer perceptions and preferences of pharmacist-led professional services and attributes in Australia: a qualitative focus group study.澳大利亚消费者对药剂师主导的专业服务及其属性的认知与偏好:一项定性焦点小组研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e101049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101049.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Residents Preferences for Pharmacist-Managed Clinic in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国住院医师对药剂师管理诊所的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 3;18:1409-1422. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S457655. eCollection 2024.
4
Preferences for Physical Examination Service in Community Health Service Center in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国社区卫生服务中心体格检查服务偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jan 6;18:39-51. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S440896. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments.患者对药房服务的偏好:基于离散选择实验的研究系统评价。
Patient. 2024 Jan;17(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00652-9. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
Patient preferences and cost-benefit of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management model between pharmacies and primary care in Portugal: A discrete choice experiment alongside a trial (USFarmácia®).葡萄牙药房与基层医疗合作管理高血压和高血脂模式的患者偏好和成本效益:一项伴随试验的离散选择实验(USFarmácia®)。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292308. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining patient preferences of community pharmacy attributes: A systematic review.确定患者对社区药房属性的偏好:一项系统综述。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Mar-Apr;60(2):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review.质量指标与社区药房服务:一项范围综述
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec;27(6):490-500. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12561. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
Patient Preferences for Endometriosis Pain Treatments in the United States.美国子宫内膜异位症疼痛治疗的患者偏好。
Value Health. 2019 Jun;22(6):728-738. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
5
Assessing Rationality in Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: An Investigation into the Use of Dominance Tests.评估健康领域离散选择实验中的理性:对优势检验使用情况的调查。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1192-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1822. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Patient preferences for objective quality metrics during community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment.患者在选择社区药店时对客观质量指标的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):641-649. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.遵循良好研究实践建议开展离散选择实验研究:一项用于引出患者对糖尿病治疗偏好的应用研究。
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.
9
Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study.美国患者对通过社区药房提供医疗服务的偏好:一项离散选择研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Dec;42(6):738-749. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12574. Epub 2017 Jun 18.
10
Association between interpersonal continuity of care and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: an observational cohort study.2型糖尿病患者医疗照护人际连续性与药物依从性之间的关联:一项观察性队列研究
CMAJ Open. 2017 May 8;5(2):E359-E364. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160063.