Dantas Fernando Luiz R, Dantas François, Mendes Plínio D, Sandes Bruno L, Fonseca Filho Gilberto
Neurological Surgery, Biocor Instituto, Belo Horizonte, BRA.
Neurological Surgery, Hospital Vila da Serra, Belo Horizonte, BRA.
Cureus. 2020 Nov 20;12(11):e11590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11590.
Introduction Anterior cervical fusion has been performed safely and effectively for decades for the treatment of multiple pathologies, with low rates of morbidity and mortality. Esophageal perforation is a rare but potentially serious complication of anterior cervical spine approaches. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment strategies for this complication. Objectives To determine the prevalence of esophageal perforation following anterior cervical fusion in a single institution and to describe two cases of this complication that were treated with primary repair. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent anterior cervical fusion in a single private institution from January 1999 to August 2017. Patients who developed esophageal perforation per- or postoperatively were included in the analysis. Results A total of 830 anterior cervical fusion surgeries were performed during the analyzed period. Two cases (0.24%), both of male patients, were complicated by esophageal perforation, one intraoperatively and the other four years after the first surgery. Both patients were treated with primary esophageal repair, and good outcomes were obtained. Conclusion Primary repair is a therapeutic option in cases of esophageal perforation after anterior cervical fusion. Satisfactory results were obtained in both cases. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the best therapeutic options for this rare complication.
引言
几十年来,颈椎前路融合术已被安全有效地用于治疗多种疾病,其发病率和死亡率较低。食管穿孔是颈椎前路手术一种罕见但可能严重的并发症。对于这种并发症的最佳治疗策略尚无共识。
目的
确定在单一机构中颈椎前路融合术后食管穿孔的发生率,并描述两例采用一期修复治疗的该并发症病例。
方法
我们回顾性分析了1999年1月至2017年8月在一家私立机构接受颈椎前路融合术的所有连续患者。分析纳入术中或术后发生食管穿孔的患者。
结果
在分析期间共进行了830例颈椎前路融合手术。两例(0.24%)患者发生食管穿孔,均为男性,一例发生在术中,另一例在首次手术后四年。两名患者均接受了食管一期修复,获得了良好的效果。
结论
一期修复是颈椎前路融合术后食管穿孔病例的一种治疗选择。两例均取得了满意的结果。有必要进一步研究以阐明这种罕见并发症的最佳治疗选择。