• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别并解决住院环境下急性缺血性卒中系统性溶栓的障碍:一项质量改进计划。

Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Inpatient Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

作者信息

Pines Andrew R, Das Devika M, Bhatt Shubhang K, Shiue Harn J, Dawit Sara, Vanderhye Vanesa K, Sands Kara A

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec 10;4(6):657-666. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.07.009. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.07.009
PMID:33367211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7749238/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify barriers to inpatient alteplase administration and implement an interdisciplinary program to reduce time to systemic thrombolysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Compared with patients presenting to the emergency department with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS), inpatients are delayed in receiving alteplase for systemic thrombolysis. Institutional AIS metrics were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients presenting as an inpatient stroke alert. All patients who received alteplase for AIS were included in the analysis. A gap analysis was used to assess institutional deficiencies. An interdisciplinary intervention was initiated to address these deficiencies. Efficacy was measured with pre- and postintervention surveys and institutional AIS metric analysis. Statistical significance was determined using the Student test. We identified 5 patients (mean age, 73 years; 100% (5/5) male; 80% (4/5) white) who met inclusion criteria for the preintervention period (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017) and 10 patients (mean age, 71 years; 50% male; 80% white) for the postintervention period (October 31, 2018, to July 1, 2020).

RESULTS

We found barriers to rapid delivery of thrombolytic treatment to include alteplase availability and comfort with bedside reconstitution. Interdisciplinary intervention strategies consisted of stocking alteplase on additional floors as well as structured education and hands-on alteplase reconstitution simulations for resident physicians. The mean time from stroke alert to thrombolysis was shorter postintervention than preintervention (57.4 minutes vs 77.8 minutes; =.03).

CONCLUSION

A coordinated interdisciplinary approach is effective in reducing time to systemic thrombolysis in patients experiencing AIS in the inpatient setting. A similar program could be implemented at other institutions to improve AIS treatment.

摘要

目的

确定住院患者使用阿替普酶的障碍,并实施一项跨学科计划以缩短全身溶栓时间。

患者与方法

与因急性缺血性卒中(AIS)就诊于急诊科的患者相比,住院患者接受阿替普酶进行全身溶栓的时间有所延迟。从作为住院卒中警报就诊的患者电子病历中提取机构AIS指标。所有接受阿替普酶治疗AIS的患者均纳入分析。采用差距分析评估机构缺陷。启动跨学科干预以解决这些缺陷。通过干预前后的调查和机构AIS指标分析来衡量疗效。使用学生t检验确定统计学显著性。我们确定了5例符合干预前期(2017年1月1日至2017年12月31日)纳入标准的患者(平均年龄73岁;100%(5/5)为男性;80%(4/5)为白人)以及10例符合干预后期(2018年10月31日至2020年7月1日)纳入标准的患者(平均年龄71岁;50%为男性;80%为白人)。

结果

我们发现快速进行溶栓治疗的障碍包括阿替普酶的可获得性以及对床边复溶的熟悉程度。跨学科干预策略包括在更多楼层储备阿替普酶,以及为住院医师提供结构化教育和阿替普酶复溶的实践模拟。干预后从卒中警报至溶栓的平均时间比干预前缩短(57.4分钟对77.8分钟;P =.03)。

结论

在住院环境中,协调一致的跨学科方法对于缩短AIS患者全身溶栓时间是有效的。其他机构可实施类似计划以改善AIS治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/6de3f2daebd6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/6d7a262f39a2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/708969a9407d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/36dc5b5be70b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/6de3f2daebd6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/6d7a262f39a2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/708969a9407d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/36dc5b5be70b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f0/7749238/6de3f2daebd6/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Inpatient Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.识别并解决住院环境下急性缺血性卒中系统性溶栓的障碍:一项质量改进计划。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec 10;4(6):657-666. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.07.009. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative.质量改进举措实施前后急性缺血性脑卒中患者组织型纤溶酶原激活剂给药的门到针时间与临床结局。
JAMA. 2014;311(16):1632-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3203.
3
Effect of Intravenous Thrombolytic Dose of Alteplase on Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.静脉注射阿替普酶溶栓剂量对急性缺血性脑卒中患者长期预后的影响。
Neurol Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):1105-1118. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00488-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Impact of Medical Community Model on Intravenous Alteplase Door-to-Needle Times and Prognosis of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.医疗社区模式对急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉注射阿替普酶的门针时间及预后的影响
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 27;9:888015. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.888015. eCollection 2022.
5
[Effect of prehospital intervention based on emergency medical services on door-to-needle time of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke].基于紧急医疗服务的院前干预对急性缺血性卒中溶栓门-针时间的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jul;30(7):667-670. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.07.010.
6
Stroke Thrombolysis in Patients Taking Ticagrelor -Two Successful Cases and a Review of the Literature.替格瑞洛治疗的缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗-两例成功病例并文献复习
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Feb;30(2):105520. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105520. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
Identifying errors and safety considerations in patients undergoing thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.识别急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗患者的错误和安全注意事项。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Thrombolysis of Acute Ischemic Stroke within 4.5 Hours: An Efficacy and Safety Study.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中4.5小时内溶栓治疗的疗效与安全性研究
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022 Sep-Oct;25(5):897-901. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1127_21. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
9
Patients with Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Scores Have Longer Door-to-Needle Times: Analysis of a Telestroke Network.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分低的患者从入院到开始溶栓的时间更长:一项远程卒中网络分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Sep;25(9):2253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
10
Utilization of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Reasons for Nonuse in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯急性缺血性卒中患者静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的使用情况及未使用原因
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 May;29(5):104761. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104761. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Stroke Recognition: A Comparative Analysis of Balance and Eyes-Face, Arms, Speech, Time (BE-FAST) and Face, Arms, Speech, Time (FAST) in Identifying Posterior Circulation Strokes.增强中风识别能力:平衡与眼-脸、手臂、言语、时间(BE-FAST)和脸、手臂、言语、时间(FAST)在识别后循环中风方面的比较分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 3;13(19):5912. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195912.
2
Comparing characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke.比较住院期间发生的卒中与社区获得性卒中的特征和结局。
J Neurol. 2022 Oct;269(10):5617-5627. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11244-2. Epub 2022 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Emergent Therapeutic Interventions in Patients Evaluated through the In-hospital Stroke Alert Protocol.通过院内卒中预警方案评估的患者的临床特征及紧急治疗干预措施
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 May;28(5):1362-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
4
Improvement in Door-to-Needle Time in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke via a Simple Stroke Activation Protocol.通过简单的卒中激活方案改善急性缺血性卒中患者的门-针时间。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jun;27(6):1539-1545. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Streamlining the Process for Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator.简化静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的流程
J Neurosci Nurs. 2018 Feb;50(1):37-41. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000337.
6
Pharmacist Participation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Decreases Door-to-Needle Time to Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator.药剂师参与急性缺血性卒中治疗可缩短重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的门针时间。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Dec;51(12):1084-1089. doi: 10.1177/1060028017724804. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
In-Patient Code Stroke: A Quality Improvement Strategy to Overcome Knowledge-to-Action Gaps in Response Time.住院患者脑卒中代码:一种克服反应时间知识转化差距的质量改进策略。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2176-2183. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017622. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Comprehensive code stroke program to reduce reperfusion delay for in-hospital stroke patients.综合性卒中代码程序以减少住院卒中患者的再灌注延迟。
Int J Stroke. 2016 Aug;11(6):656-62. doi: 10.1177/1747493016641724. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
9
Risk profile and treatment options of acute ischemic in-hospital stroke.急性缺血性院内卒中的风险概况与治疗选择
J Neurol. 2016 Mar;263(3):550-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-8010-2. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Care and Outcomes of Patients With In-Hospital Stroke.住院期间卒中患者的护理和结局。
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Jul;72(7):749-55. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0284.