Galloway Adam M, van-Hille Thomas, Perry Daniel C, Holton Colin, Mason Laura, Richards Suzanne, Siddle Heidi J, Comer Christine
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Dec 2;1(12):720-730. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.112.BJO-2020-0138.R1.
Perthes' disease is a condition leading to necrosis of the femoral head. It is most common in children aged four to nine years, affecting around one per 1,200 children in the UK. Management typically includes non-surgical treatment options, such as physiotherapy with/without surgical intervention. However, there is significant variation in care with no consensus on the most effective treatment option.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for the treatment of Perthes' disease. Comparative studies (experimental or observational) of any non-surgical intervention compared directly with any alternative intervention (surgical, non-surgical or no intervention) were identified from: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMcare, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Data were extracted on interventions compared and methodological quality. For post-intervention primary outcome of radiological scores (Stulberg and/or Mose), event rates for poor scores were calculated with significance values. Secondary outcomes included functional measures, such as range of movement, and patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life.
In all, 15 studies (1,745 participants) were eligible for inclusion: eight prospective cohort studies, seven retrospective cohort studies, and no randomized controlled trials were identified. Non-surgical interventions largely focused on orthotic management (14/15 studies) and physical interventions such as muscle strengthening or stretching (5/15 studies). Most studies were of high/unknown risk of bias, and the range of patient outcomes was very limited, as was reporting of treatment protocols. Similar proportions of children achieving poor radiological outcomes were found for orthotic management and physical interventions, such as physiotherapy or weightbearing alteration, compared with surgical interventions or no intervention.
Evidence from non-randomized studies found no robust evidence regarding the most effective non-surgical interventions for the treatment of children with Perthes' disease. Future research, employing randomized trial designs, and reporting a wider range of patient outcomes is urgently needed to inform clinical practice.Cite this article: 2020;1-12:720-730.
佩特兹病是一种导致股骨头坏死的病症。它在4至9岁的儿童中最为常见,在英国每1200名儿童中约有1人患病。治疗通常包括非手术治疗方案,如伴有或不伴有手术干预的物理治疗。然而,治疗存在显著差异,对于最有效的治疗方案尚无共识。
本系统评价旨在评估非手术干预治疗佩特兹病的有效性。从以下数据库中识别出将任何非手术干预与任何替代干预(手术、非手术或无干预)直接进行比较的对照研究(实验性或观察性):Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引数据库、循证医学数据库、补充与替代医学数据库以及物理治疗证据数据库。提取了关于比较的干预措施和方法学质量的数据。对于干预后的主要结局放射学评分(斯图尔伯格和/或莫斯评分),计算了不良评分发生率及显著性值。次要结局包括功能指标,如活动范围,以及患者报告的结局,如与健康相关的生活质量。
共有15项研究(1745名参与者)符合纳入标准:8项前瞻性队列研究、7项回顾性队列研究,但未识别出随机对照试验。非手术干预主要集中在矫形器管理(14/15项研究)和物理干预,如肌肉强化或拉伸(5/15项研究)。大多数研究存在高/偏倚风险未知的情况,患者结局范围非常有限,治疗方案的报告也很有限。与手术干预或无干预相比,在矫形器管理以及物理干预(如物理治疗或负重改变)中,出现不良放射学结局的儿童比例相似。
非随机研究的证据表明,对于治疗佩特兹病的儿童,尚无关于最有效非手术干预措施的确凿证据。迫切需要采用随机试验设计并报告更广泛患者结局的未来研究,以为临床实践提供依据。引用本文:2020;1 - 12:720 - 730。