• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multisite Quality Improvement Study of a Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program.患者-病理学家会诊计划的多中心质量改进研究
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 May 18;155(6):887-894. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa202.
2
"Please Help Me See the Dragon I Am Slaying": Implementation of a Novel Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program and Survey of Patient Experience.“请帮我看看我正在斩杀的龙”:一种新型医患咨询方案的实施及患者体验调查。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Jul;143(7):852-858. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0379-OA. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
3
Comparing Patients' Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey.比较患者对电子会诊和传统会诊的体验:一项多地点调查的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1135-1142. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05703-7. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters.医疗服务提供者与电子健康记录的交互:对医疗问诊中以患者为中心的沟通的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
5
The Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program: A Mixed-Methods Study of Interest and Motivations in Cancer Patients.患者-病理学家咨询计划:癌症患者兴趣和动机的混合方法研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Apr;144(4):490-496. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0105-OA. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Exploring the perspectives of patients about their care experience: identifying what patients perceive are important qualities in cancer care.探讨患者对其护理体验的看法:确定患者认为癌症护理中重要的品质是什么。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2299-2309. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05057-9. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
7
Assessing Patient Satisfaction and Experience With an Electronic Referral Process.评估患者对电子转诊流程的满意度和体验。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Jan/Mar;29(1):20-29. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000235.
8
Patient Satisfaction With a Multisite, Multiregional Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Acute and Chronic Condition Management: Survey-Based Analysis.患者对急性和慢性疾病管理的多地点、多区域远程患者监测计划的满意度:基于调查的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 27;25:e44528. doi: 10.2196/44528.
9
Pathology Consultation Clinic for Patients With Cancer: Meeting the Clinician Behind the Microscope.癌症患者病理会诊门诊:走近显微镜后的临床医生。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1559-e1566. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00948. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Patient experiences with coordination of care: the benefit of continuity and primary care physician as referral source.患者在医疗协调方面的体验:连续性的益处以及初级保健医生作为转诊来源的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):170-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0885-5. Epub 2008 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Putting the patient at the centre of pathology: an innovative approach to patient education-MyPathologyReport.ca.将患者置于病理学核心:一种创新的患者教育方法——MyPathologyReport.ca。
J Clin Pathol. 2020 Aug;73(8):454-455. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206370. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
The Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program: A Mixed-Methods Study of Interest and Motivations in Cancer Patients.患者-病理学家咨询计划:癌症患者兴趣和动机的混合方法研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Apr;144(4):490-496. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0105-OA. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
Emerging From the Basement: The Visible Pathologist.走出地下室:崭露头角的病理学家。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Aug;143(8):917-918. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0020-ED.
4
"Please Help Me See the Dragon I Am Slaying": Implementation of a Novel Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program and Survey of Patient Experience.“请帮我看看我正在斩杀的龙”:一种新型医患咨询方案的实施及患者体验调查。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Jul;143(7):852-858. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0379-OA. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
5
Talking to Myself.自言自语。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Jun;142(6):682-683. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0576-ED.
6
The essential role of pathologists in health care and health policy.病理学家在医疗保健和卫生政策中的重要作用。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Apr;139(4):441-4. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0335-ED.
7
The association between survey timing and patient-reported experiences with hospitals: results of a national postal survey.调查时间与患者对医院体验的相关性:全国邮政调查结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Feb 15;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-13.
8
User satisfaction is influenced by the interval between a health care service and the assessment of the service.用户满意度受到医疗服务和服务评估之间间隔的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1882-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

患者-病理学家会诊计划的多中心质量改进研究

Multisite Quality Improvement Study of a Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program.

作者信息

Jug Rachel, Booth Adam L, Buckley Anne F, Newell Jordan, Kesterson Joshua, Gardner Jerad M, Ozcan Lerna, Liu Beiyu, Green Cynthia L, Joseph Lija, Cummings Thomas J

机构信息

Departments of Pathology, Durham, NC.

Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 May 18;155(6):887-894. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa202.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa202
PMID:33367493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8130872/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this multisite quality improvement study was to evaluate patients' experiences with the patient-centered pathology (PCP) consultation program and to determine whether PCP enhanced their care experience.

METHODS

Patients were invited to attend PCP consultations to review their pathology report and slides and have their questions answered by the pathologist privately, with the option to attend the appointment with family members or friends for support. A patient experience questionnaire (PEQ) was administered to patients, who participated voluntarily in the PCP, and survey data were collected and stored in REDCap. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (95.5% female) aged 18 to 84 years across 4 institutions completed the PEQ. Overall, 58% and 15.8% of patients had breast and brain tumors, respectively, and 59.7% of tumors were newly diagnosed. Most patients thought it was important for them to learn as much as they could about their health condition. However, the majority of patients reported some degree of difficulty learning about their health condition based on written information, despite 97% having completed high school and/or further education. The majority of patients rated their pathologist as "excellent" across communication metrics. Ultimately, 100% of respondents were satisfied, found their visits to be useful, and would recommend the PCP to other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients found that personalized clinical encounters with pathologists improved their understanding of their health condition and their satisfaction with their care experience. Patients thought pathologists communicated respectfully, effectively, and empathetically.

摘要

目的

这项多中心质量改进研究的目的是评估患者对以患者为中心的病理学(PCP)咨询项目的体验,并确定PCP是否提升了他们的护理体验。

方法

邀请患者参加PCP咨询,以复查他们的病理报告和切片,并由病理学家私下回答他们的问题,患者也可以选择让家人或朋友陪同参加预约以获得支持。对自愿参加PCP的患者发放患者体验问卷(PEQ),收集调查数据并存储在REDCap中。使用SAS 9.4(SAS研究所)进行统计分析。

结果

来自4个机构的67名年龄在18至84岁之间的患者(95.5%为女性)完成了PEQ。总体而言,分别有58%和15.8%的患者患有乳腺肿瘤和脑肿瘤,59.7%的肿瘤为新诊断病例。大多数患者认为尽可能多地了解自己的健康状况对他们很重要。然而,尽管97%的患者完成了高中和/或继续教育,但大多数患者表示基于书面信息了解自己的健康状况存在一定程度的困难。在沟通指标方面,大多数患者对他们的病理学家评价为“优秀”。最终,100%的受访者表示满意,认为他们的就诊很有用,并会向其他患者推荐PCP。

结论

患者发现与病理学家进行个性化的临床接触提高了他们对自身健康状况的理解以及对护理体验的满意度。患者认为病理学家沟通时尊重他人、有效且富有同理心。