Ackerman Sara L, Gleason Nathaniel, Shipman Scott A
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1135-1142. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05703-7. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
There have been no large-scale studies to date of patients' experiences with electronic consultation (eConsult) between primary and specialty care.
Compare experiences with eConsult and referral for in-person specialist consultation.
Online survey 2-6 weeks following eConsult or referral at 9 US academic medical centers.
Adult patients with no more than one eConsult or referral order from a primary care provider (PCP) in the prior month. Over 9 months, 29,291 email invitations were sent (88% referral; 12% eConsult).
Trust in and satisfaction with PCP; consult type awareness; agreement with decision to seek specialist input; timeliness of care; mode of PCP-patient eConsult communication; satisfaction with specialist's recommendations; future preference for eConsult or referral.
A 27.6% response rate yielded 8087 respondents (88.4% referral; 11.6% eConsult). Many did not know that their PCP had placed a referral (32.8% unaware) or eConsult (52.9%), and eConsult awareness was significantly higher among patients reporting better health (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.18-2.23). Most (81.4% eConsult; 82.0% referral) were satisfied with the specialist's recommendations. Those who had a good primary care experience were more likely to be satisfied (eConsult: OR 10.63, 95% CI 2.95-38.32; referral: OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.86-4.44). For a similar problem in the future, 78% of eConsult and 32% percent of referral patients preferred eConsult.
This multisite study demonstrates that many patients find virtual consultation to be an acceptable strategy for the management of their medical condition and that trust and confidence in one's PCP are crucial ingredients for a satisfying eConsult experience. The lack of awareness of eConsult among many patients who were beneficiaries of the service warrants an increased effort to include patients in eConsult decision-making and communication. Further research is needed to assess eConsult acceptability and satisfaction in more diverse patient populations.
迄今为止,尚未有针对初级保健与专科保健之间电子会诊(eConsult)患者体验的大规模研究。
比较电子会诊与转诊至专科医生进行面对面会诊的体验。
在美国9家学术医疗中心进行电子会诊或转诊后2 - 6周开展在线调查。
前一个月内从初级保健提供者(PCP)处收到不超过一份电子会诊或转诊医嘱的成年患者。在9个月的时间里,共发送了29291封电子邮件邀请(88%为转诊;12%为电子会诊)。
对初级保健提供者的信任和满意度;会诊类型知晓度;对寻求专科医生意见这一决定的认同度;护理及时性;初级保健提供者与患者电子会诊沟通方式;对专科医生建议的满意度;未来对电子会诊或转诊的偏好。
27.6%的回复率产生了8087名受访者(88.4%为转诊;11.6%为电子会诊)。许多人不知道他们的初级保健提供者进行了转诊(32.8%不知情)或电子会诊(52.9%),且在报告健康状况较好的患者中,电子会诊知晓度显著更高(比值比1.62,95%置信区间1.18 - 2.23)。大多数人(81.4%的电子会诊患者;82.0%的转诊患者)对专科医生的建议感到满意。有良好初级保健体验的人更有可能感到满意(电子会诊:比值比10.63,95%置信区间2.95 - 38.32;转诊:比值比2.87,95%置信区间1.86 - 4.44)。对于未来类似的问题,78%的电子会诊患者和32%的转诊患者更倾向于电子会诊。
这项多中心研究表明,许多患者发现虚拟会诊是管理其医疗状况的可接受策略,并且对自己的初级保健提供者的信任和信心是获得满意电子会诊体验的关键因素。许多受益于该服务的患者对电子会诊缺乏了解,这就需要加大力度让患者参与电子会诊的决策和沟通。需要进一步研究以评估更广泛患者群体对电子会诊的接受度和满意度。