Suppr超能文献

接受阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛人群中普瑞巴林使用的临床相关性及其结局:一项为期五年的前瞻性队列研究。

Clinical correlates and outcomes associated with pregabalin use among people prescribed opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: A five-year prospective cohort study.

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;87(8):3092-3104. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14715. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Abstract

AIMS

Pregabalin has become widely used as an alternative to opioids in treating certain types of chronic non-cancer pain, but few studies have examined its clinical efficacy outside trials. We address this gap by examining the utilization, correlates and clinical outcomes of pregabalin use among an Australian community-based cohort of people prescribed opioids for chronic non-cancer pain.

METHODS

Through a five-year prospective cohort study (n = 1514) we examined associations between pregabalin use and pain severity and interference, mental health, opioid dose and past month use of ambulance and emergency department services. We used fixed-effects regression models to examine within-participant differences, and random-effects regression models to examine within- and between-participant differences in clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In an analysis of cases with complete data over five-years (n = 896), the prevalence of pregabalin use ranged from 16% at cohort entry to 29% at 36- and 48-months, and 46% reported pregabalin use at any time during the five years. Pregabalin use was associated with greater pain severity and interference and greater use of high-risk opioid doses (>90 oral morphine equivalents/day). Pregabalin use was not associated with changes in mental health symptoms, ambulance or emergency department attendance in the fixed or random effects models.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregabalin use was common, but for most people use was not associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain or functioning.

摘要

目的

普瑞巴林已广泛用作治疗某些类型慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物替代药物,但很少有研究在试验之外检查其临床疗效。我们通过检查澳大利亚基于社区的开处阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的患者队列中普瑞巴林的使用情况、相关性和临床结果来解决这一差距。

方法

通过一项为期五年的前瞻性队列研究(n=1514),我们检查了普瑞巴林使用与疼痛严重程度和干扰、心理健康、阿片类药物剂量以及过去一个月使用救护车和急诊服务之间的关联。我们使用固定效应回归模型检查参与者内差异,使用随机效应回归模型检查参与者内和参与者间差异的临床结果。

结果

在对五年内完整数据的病例进行分析(n=896)中,普瑞巴林的使用率从队列入组时的 16%到 36 个月和 48 个月时的 29%,以及在五年期间的任何时间,46%的人报告使用普瑞巴林。普瑞巴林的使用与更高的疼痛严重程度和干扰以及更高的高风险阿片类药物剂量(>90 口服吗啡当量/天)的使用相关。在固定或随机效应模型中,普瑞巴林的使用与心理健康症状、救护车或急诊就诊次数的变化无关。

结论

普瑞巴林的使用很常见,但对大多数人来说,使用并不能带来疼痛或功能的明显改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验