Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S149-S161. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12945.
Authors were assigned the task to develop case definitions for periodontitis in the context of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. The aim of this manuscript is to review evidence and rationale for a revision of the current classification, to provide a framework for case definition that fully implicates state-of-the-art knowledge and can be adapted as new evidence emerges, and to suggest a case definition system that can be implemented in clinical practice, research and epidemiologic surveillance.
Evidence gathered in four commissioned reviews was analyzed and interpreted with special emphasis to changes with regards to the understanding available prior to the 1999 classification. Authors analyzed case definition systems employed for a variety of chronic diseases and identified key criteria for a classification/case definition of periodontitis.
The manuscript discusses the merits of a periodontitis case definition system based on Staging and Grading and proposes a case definition framework. Stage I to IV of periodontitis is defined based on severity (primarily periodontal breakdown with reference to root length and periodontitis-associated tooth loss), complexity of management (pocket depth, infrabony defects, furcation involvement, tooth hypermobility, masticatory dysfunction) and additionally described as extent (localized or generalized). Grade of periodontitis is estimated with direct or indirect evidence of progression rate in three categories: slow, moderate and rapid progression (Grade A-C). Risk factor analysis is used as grade modifier.
The paper describes a simple matrix based on stage and grade to appropriately define periodontitis in an individual patient. The proposed case definition extends beyond description based on severity to include characterization of biological features of the disease and represents a first step towards adoption of precision medicine concepts to the management of periodontitis. It also provides the necessary framework for introduction of biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis.
作者的任务是在 2017 年世界牙周病和种植体周围疾病分类研讨会上制定牙周炎的病例定义。本文的目的是回顾当前分类修订的证据和原理,提供一个充分体现最新知识并能随着新证据出现而调整的病例定义框架,并提出一个可用于临床实践、研究和流行病学监测的病例定义系统。
对四项委托审查中收集的证据进行分析和解释,特别强调与 1999 年分类前可用知识相比的变化。作者分析了用于各种慢性疾病的病例定义系统,并确定了牙周炎分类/病例定义的关键标准。
本文讨论了基于分期和分级的牙周炎病例定义系统的优点,并提出了一个病例定义框架。牙周炎分为 I 期至 IV 期,依据严重程度(主要是牙周破坏参照牙根长度和牙周炎相关牙齿丧失)、治疗复杂性(牙周袋深度、骨下缺损、分叉受累、牙齿松动、咀嚼功能障碍)以及另外根据病变范围(局限性或广泛性)来定义。牙周炎的分级依据进展率的直接或间接证据分为三个类别:缓慢、中度和快速进展(A-C 级)。风险因素分析用作分级修饰剂。
本文描述了一种基于分期和分级的简单矩阵,用于在个体患者中适当定义牙周炎。所提出的病例定义超出了基于严重程度的描述,包括疾病的生物学特征的描述,并代表了朝着将精准医学概念应用于牙周炎管理的第一步。它还为在诊断和预后中引入生物标志物提供了必要的框架。