• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上唇系带切开术的评价:传统手术刀技术与 Er:YAG 激光技术的随机、对照比较研究。

Evaluation of upper labial frenectomy: A randomized, controlled comparative study of conventional scalpel technique and Er:YAG laser technique.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Public Dental Health, Uppsala County Council, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):522-530. doi: 10.1002/cre2.374. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1002/cre2.374
PMID:33369213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8404491/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Abnormalities in the maxillary frenum may lead to esthetic or functional limitations and need to be corrected with a surgical intervention called frenectomy. The aim of the study was to compare frenectomies performed using Er:YAG laser technology with those using a conventional scalpel technique. Comparisons were of patients' experiences, treatment times, bleeding during treatment and wound healing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The trial was performed as a prospective, randomized and controlled, single-blind investigation. A total of 40 patients requiring frenectomy were randomly assigned to groups which underwent either conventional or Er:YAG laser treatment. Patients' experiences, treatment time, bleeding and wound healing were evaluated immediately after surgery and 5 days, 12 days and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Significant increase in time spent in surgery and bleeding was seen with conventional scalpel surgery. Directly after surgery the wound area was significantly larger in the laser group but at the 5-day evaluation no difference could be observed between the groups. Finally, patients were satisfied with both methods, giving them the same assessments.

CONCLUSION

In the frenectomy procedure, laser surgery is faster and causes less bleeding and may be advantageous in frenectomies.

摘要

目的

上颚系带异常可能导致美观或功能受限,需要通过称为系带切除术的手术干预来纠正。本研究的目的是比较使用 Er:YAG 激光技术和传统手术刀技术进行的系带切除术。比较的内容包括患者的体验、治疗时间、治疗过程中的出血和伤口愈合情况。

材料和方法

该试验是前瞻性、随机对照、单盲研究。共 40 例需要进行系带切除术的患者被随机分为接受传统或 Er:YAG 激光治疗的两组。术后即刻、术后 5 天、12 天和 3 个月评估患者的体验、治疗时间、出血和伤口愈合情况。

结果

传统手术刀手术的手术时间和出血量明显增加。激光组术后即刻的伤口面积明显较大,但在第 5 天评估时两组之间没有差异。最终,两组患者都对这两种方法感到满意,给予相同的评价。

结论

在系带切除术过程中,激光手术更快,出血量更少,可能在系带切除术方面具有优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/b6f62aa30bd0/CRE2-7-522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/a499a74e8e72/CRE2-7-522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/4d618ae40c7d/CRE2-7-522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/b6f62aa30bd0/CRE2-7-522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/a499a74e8e72/CRE2-7-522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/4d618ae40c7d/CRE2-7-522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6218/8404491/b6f62aa30bd0/CRE2-7-522-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of upper labial frenectomy: A randomized, controlled comparative study of conventional scalpel technique and Er:YAG laser technique.上唇系带切开术的评价:传统手术刀技术与 Er:YAG 激光技术的随机、对照比较研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):522-530. doi: 10.1002/cre2.374. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
2
Comparison of pain and healing period after frenectomy using diode laser and Er:YAG laser: a randomized controlled trial.使用二极管激光和铒:钇铝石榴石激光进行系带切除术的疼痛和愈合期比较:一项随机对照试验。
Quintessence Int. 2024 Aug 30;55(7):570-578. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5223619.
3
Maxillary labial frenectomy: a randomized, controlled comparative study of two blue (445 nm) and infrared (980 nm) diode lasers versus surgical scalpel.上颌唇系带切除术:两种蓝(445nm)和红外(980nm)二极管激光与手术手术刀的随机对照比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04364-w.
4
Comparative study of upper lip frenectomy with the CO2 laser versus the Er, Cr:YSGG laser.上唇系带切除术的 CO2 激光与 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光的对比研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Mar 1;17(2):e228-32. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17373.
5
Comparative Study on the Treatment of Ankyloglossia by Using Er:YAG Laser or Traditional Scalpel.铒激光与传统手术刀治疗舌系带过短的对比研究。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(8):e792-e795. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007788.
6
Laser labial frenectomy: a simplified and predictable technique. Retrospective clinical study.激光唇系带切除术:一种简化且可预测的技术。回顾性临床研究。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;19(1):56-60. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.01.10.
7
Evaluation of Pain Perception and Wound Healing After Laser-Assisted Frenectomy in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study.评价激光辅助下的小儿翼状胬肉切除术对疼痛感知和伤口愈合的影响:一项回顾性对比研究。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Mar;39(3):204-210. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4886. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
8
Frenectomy with conventional scalpel and Nd:YAG laser technique: A comparative evaluation.传统手术刀与Nd:YAG激光技术行系带切除术的比较评估
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_352_18.
9
Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: A comparison of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and conventional techniques in the same patients.系带切除术患者术后认知的评估:钕掺杂钇铝石榴石激光与传统技术在同一患者中的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;21(8):1059-1064. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_2_18.
10
Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Maxillary Labial Frenectomy Procedure Using Diode Laser (980 nm) and Conventional Scalpel: An Observational Study.评估使用二极管激光(980纳米)和传统手术刀进行上颌唇系带切除术的临床疗效:一项观察性研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S688-S692. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_85_23. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Slim V-shaped frenectomy: Description of a minimally invasive surgical technique.纤细V形系带切除术:一种微创手术技术的描述。
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2025 Apr 22;17(2):119-122. doi: 10.34172/japid.025.3524. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparative evaluation of modified frenectomy with papilla preservation flap versus conventional technique in upper labial frenectomy: a randomized controlled trial.改良唇系带切除术保留乳头瓣与传统技术在上唇唇系带切除术中的比较评估:一项随机对照试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 5;87(3):1324-1333. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003073. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Clinical evaluation of pain perception and surgical wound healing after lower labial frenectomy with diode laser technique: pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
Laser Techniques or Scalpel Incision for Labial Frenectomy: A Meta-analysis.唇系带切除术的激光技术或手术刀切开术:一项荟萃分析。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Dec;18(4):490-499. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01196-y. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
2
Laser labial frenectomy: a simplified and predictable technique. Retrospective clinical study.激光唇系带切除术:一种简化且可预测的技术。回顾性临床研究。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;19(1):56-60. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.01.10.
3
Patient perceptions and clinical efficacy of labial frenectomies using diode laser versus conventional techniques.
二极管激光技术行下唇系带切除术术后疼痛感知及手术伤口愈合的临床评估:初步研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 19;40(1):104. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04370-6.
4
Evaluating diode laser and conventional scalpel techniques in maxillary labial frenectomy for patient perception, tissue healing, and clinical efficacy: six-month results of a randomized controlled study.评估二极管激光和传统手术刀技术在上颌唇系带切除术对患者感受、组织愈合及临床疗效的影响:一项随机对照研究的六个月结果
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Mar 1;30(2):e256-e264. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26931.
5
Assessment and Management of Maxillary Labial Frenum-A Scoping Review.上颌唇系带的评估与管理——一项范围综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(16):1710. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161710.
6
The features of the reparative regeneration of an oral mucosa wound created under the exposure of a laser at a wavelength of 445 nm (a pilot study).445nm 激光暴露下口腔黏膜创面修复再生的特点(初步研究)。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jun 8;39(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04105-z.
7
Labial Frenectomy using Laser: A Scoping Review.使用激光的唇系带切除术:一项范围综述
Int J Dent. 2023 Apr 30;2023:7321735. doi: 10.1155/2023/7321735. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparative frenectomy with conventional scalpel and dual-waved laser in labial frenulum.唇系带处传统手术刀与双波长激光对比性系带切除术
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000363. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical Comparison of Diode Laser Assisted "v-Shape Frenectomy" and Conventional Surgical Method as Treatment of Ankyloglossia.二极管激光辅助“V形舌系带切除术”与传统手术方法治疗舌系带过短的临床比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;10(1):89. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010089.
患者对使用二极管激光与传统技术行唇系带切除术的感知和临床疗效。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;119(3):182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Laser Surgery of Soft Tissue in Orthodontics: Review of the Clinical Trials.正畸学中软组织的激光手术:临床试验综述
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Summer;8(Suppl 1):S1-S6. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.s1. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
5
Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.用于测量慢性下肢静脉溃疡的数字平面测量法的可靠性和测量误差
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Sep;25(5):901-905. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12587. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
6
A randomized controlled clinical and histopathological trial comparing excisional biopsies of oral fibrous hyperplasias using CO and Er:YAG laser.一项比较使用CO激光和铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光对口腔纤维性增生进行切除活检的随机对照临床和组织病理学试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Apr;32(3):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2151-8. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
The Evolving Field of Wound Measurement Techniques: A Literature Review.伤口测量技术的发展领域:文献综述
Wounds. 2016 Jun;28(6):175-81.
8
Transcultural perception of maxillary midline diastema.上颌中线牙缝的跨文化认知
Int J Esthet Dent. 2015 Winter;10(4):610-7.
9
Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.采用数字平面测量法测量伤口面积:基于两把尺子进行校准可提高准确性和精密度。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0134622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134622. eCollection 2015.
10
Effects of laser-assisted cosmetic smile lift gingivectomy on postoperative bleeding and pain in fixed orthodontic patients: a controlled clinical trial.激光辅助美容性微笑提升牙龈切除术对固定正畸患者术后出血和疼痛的影响:一项对照临床试验。
Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 9;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0066-5.