• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良唇系带切除术保留乳头瓣与传统技术在上唇唇系带切除术中的比较评估:一项随机对照试验

Comparative evaluation of modified frenectomy with papilla preservation flap versus conventional technique in upper labial frenectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Sayegh Wadie, Khalil Ali, Sleman Nadim

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Tishreen University Hospital, Latakia, Syria.

Professor and Head of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 5;87(3):1324-1333. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003073. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003073
PMID:40213255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11981421/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cosmetic concerns among patients have led to an increased demand for dental treatments aimed at achieving a perfect smile. One of the main cosmetic issues in adults is the gap between the upper incisors, known as diastema, and the upper lip frenulum is often a contributing factor to this condition. Therefore, it is imaportant to focus on this aspect.

OBJECTIVE

To explore a new technique for cutting the upper lip frenulum in patients with a gap between the central incisors while avoiding the negative effects of the traditional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical trial included 20 patients diagnosed with abnormal upper lip frenal attachment and diastema between the central incisors. The study compared the modified frenectomy technique with a papilla preservation flap against the traditional "Archer" technique. Each technique was performed on 10 patients, and outcomes such as scar formation, gingival inflammation, and post-surgical pain were evaluated.

RESULTS

The "modified frenectomy with papilla preservation flap" technique prevented scar formation in the papilla area between the upper incisors in nine cases, while scar formation occurred in seven cases using the traditional technique. There were no statistically significant differences in gingival inflammation post-surgery. Pain levels were lower with the modified technique: on the first day, the average pain score was 1.5 for the modified technique and 2.8 for the traditional technique. By the third day, the average pain was 4.3 for the modified technique and 6.9 for the traditional technique, with pain decreasing by the seventh day to an average of 0.7 for the modified technique and 1.6 for the traditional technique.

CONCLUSION

The modified frenectomy with a papilla protection flap effectively reduces scarring, enhances healing, and minimizes postoperative pain, offering a more comfortable and aesthetically better result than conventional methods.

摘要

引言

患者对美容的关注导致对旨在实现完美笑容的牙科治疗的需求增加。成年人主要的美容问题之一是上切牙之间的间隙,即牙间隙,而上唇系带通常是导致这种情况的一个因素。因此,关注这一方面很重要。

目的

探索一种在中切牙间有间隙的患者中切割上唇系带的新技术,同时避免传统技术的负面影响。

材料与方法

这项随机对照临床试验纳入了20例被诊断为上唇系带附着异常且中切牙间有牙间隙的患者。该研究将改良的保留乳头瓣系带切除术技术与传统的“阿彻”技术进行了比较。每种技术分别应用于10例患者,并对诸如瘢痕形成、牙龈炎症和术后疼痛等结果进行了评估。

结果

“改良保留乳头瓣系带切除术”技术在9例患者中防止了上切牙之间乳头区域的瘢痕形成,而使用传统技术的7例患者出现了瘢痕形成。术后牙龈炎症无统计学显著差异。改良技术的疼痛程度较低:第一天,改良技术的平均疼痛评分为1.5,传统技术为2.8。到第三天,改良技术的平均疼痛评分为4.3,传统技术为6.9,到第七天疼痛减轻,改良技术平均为0.7,传统技术为1.6。

结论

改良的保留乳头瓣系带切除术能有效减少瘢痕形成,促进愈合,并将术后疼痛降至最低,比传统方法提供了更舒适且美观效果更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of modified frenectomy with papilla preservation flap versus conventional technique in upper labial frenectomy: a randomized controlled trial.改良唇系带切除术保留乳头瓣与传统技术在上唇唇系带切除术中的比较评估:一项随机对照试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 5;87(3):1324-1333. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003073. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
A modified frenectomy technique: a new surgical approach.一种改良的系带切除术技术:一种新的手术方法。
Gen Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):34-38.
3
Frenectomy Managed by a Bilateral Pedicle Flap: A Case Report.双侧蒂瓣法治疗系带切除术:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71701. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71701. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Comparative frenectomy with conventional scalpel and dual-waved laser in labial frenulum.唇系带处传统手术刀与双波长激光对比性系带切除术
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000363. eCollection 2022.
5
Diastema size and type of upper lip midline frenulum attachment.间隙大小及上唇中线系带附着类型。
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2017;76(3):501-505. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0079. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
Clinical Efficacy of Conventional and Diode Laser-Assisted Frenectomy in Patients with Different Abnormal Frenulum Insertions: A Retrospective Study.常规和二极管激光辅助系带切开术治疗不同异常系带附着患者的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Sep;38(9):565-570. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4841. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
7
Labial Frenectomy using Laser: A Scoping Review.使用激光的唇系带切除术:一项范围综述
Int J Dent. 2023 Apr 30;2023:7321735. doi: 10.1155/2023/7321735. eCollection 2023.
8
Maxillary labial frenectomy: a randomized, controlled comparative study of two blue (445 nm) and infrared (980 nm) diode lasers versus surgical scalpel.上颌唇系带切除术:两种蓝(445nm)和红外(980nm)二极管激光与手术手术刀的随机对照比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04364-w.
9
Evaluation of Pain Perception and Wound Healing After Laser-Assisted Frenectomy in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study.评价激光辅助下的小儿翼状胬肉切除术对疼痛感知和伤口愈合的影响:一项回顾性对比研究。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Mar;39(3):204-210. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4886. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
10
Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Maxillary Labial Frenectomy Procedure Using Diode Laser (980 nm) and Conventional Scalpel: An Observational Study.评估使用二极管激光(980纳米)和传统手术刀进行上颌唇系带切除术的临床疗效:一项观察性研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S688-S692. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_85_23. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of upper labial frenectomy: A randomized, controlled comparative study of conventional scalpel technique and Er:YAG laser technique.上唇系带切开术的评价:传统手术刀技术与 Er:YAG 激光技术的随机、对照比较研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):522-530. doi: 10.1002/cre2.374. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
2
Laser Techniques or Scalpel Incision for Labial Frenectomy: A Meta-analysis.唇系带切除术的激光技术或手术刀切开术:一项荟萃分析。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Dec;18(4):490-499. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01196-y. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
3
Frenectomy with conventional scalpel and Nd:YAG laser technique: A comparative evaluation.
传统手术刀与Nd:YAG激光技术行系带切除术的比较评估
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_352_18.
4
Paralleling technique for frenectomy and oral hygiene evaluation after frenectomy.唇系带切除术及唇系带切除术后口腔卫生评估的平行技术
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):28-31. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.175170.
5
Frenectomy with semilunar coronally repositioned flap: A single stage approach - simple solution for complex problem.半月形冠状移位瓣龈系带切除术:一种单阶段方法——解决复杂问题的简单方案。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):454-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.154172.
6
Does the maxillary midline diastema close after frenectomy?唇系带切除术后上颌中线间隙会闭合吗?
Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):57-66. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30772.
7
Frenectomy: a review with the reports of surgical techniques.系带切除术:手术技术报告综述
J Clin Diagn Res. 2012 Nov;6(9):1587-92. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4089.2572.
8
Perio-esthetic surgery: Using LPF with frenectomy for prevention of scar.牙周美学手术:使用局部皮瓣转移术联合系带切除术预防瘢痕形成。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Jul;15(3):265-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.85672.
9
Management of maxillary midline diastema with emphasis on etiology.上颌中线牙间隙的管理,重点关注病因。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Summer;32(4):265-72. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.j087t33221771387.
10
Evaluation of patient perceptions of frenectomy: a comparison of Nd:YAG laser and conventional techniques.患者对系带切除术认知的评估:钕钇铝石榴石激光与传统技术的比较
Photomed Laser Surg. 2008 Apr;26(2):147-52. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2153.