• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在酒精使用障碍中,行为抑制的学习速度较慢。

Slower rates of learning to inhibit behavior in alcohol use disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Feb;36(1):39-43. doi: 10.1037/adb0000599. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000599
PMID:33370127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8236501/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with passive avoidance learning (PAL) deficits. This study investigated PAL deficits in AUD by using a novel growth model approach to quantify patterns of PAL as changes in false alarms over time, rather than the typical index of total false alarms in a PAL task.

METHOD

Subjects, 112 (58 men; 54 women) with an AUD and 110 controls (44 men; 66 women), were administered a monetary incentive Go/No-Go task. Subjects could win $0.25 for a hit (response after a GO) or lose $0.25 for a false alarm.

RESULTS

PAL rate was quantified as the slope of initial learning phase (across the first 5 blocks) on the Go/No-Go task. The PAL curves indicated rapid learning in first 5 blocks followed by a later slower learning across blocks 6-9 (consolidation phase). A piecewise growth model with random intercepts indicated that AUD status was significantly associated with a slower initial PAL (i.e. learning phase), with B = -0.69, p < 0.001 for the control group and a PAL slope of 0.13 higher for the AUD group indicating a slower learning rate in the AUD group. This effect was not observed in the consolidation phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that those with an AUD have greater difficulty learning to avoid negative consequences compared with controls. The results also suggest that measuring PAL rate by focusing on the rate of learning early in the task may be a better index of PAL learning than simply looking at overall false alarm rate. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

酒精使用障碍(AUD)与被动回避学习(PAL)缺陷有关。本研究通过使用一种新的增长模型方法来量化 PAL 缺陷,该方法通过随时间变化的虚报率来量化 PAL 模式,而不是通过 PAL 任务中的总虚报率来量化。

方法

112 名(58 名男性;54 名女性)患有 AUD 的受试者和 110 名对照者(44 名男性;66 名女性)接受了金钱激励 Go/No-Go 任务。受试者可以通过做出反应(GO 之后)赢得 0.25 美元,也可以因为虚报而输掉 0.25 美元。

结果

PAL 率被量化为 Go/No-Go 任务中初始学习阶段(前 5 个块)的斜率。PAL 曲线表明在前 5 个块中快速学习,然后在第 6-9 个块中较慢地学习(巩固阶段)。带有随机截距的分段增长模型表明,AUD 状态与较慢的初始 PAL(即学习阶段)显著相关,B=-0.69,p<0.001,对照组的 PAL 斜率为 0.13,AUD 组的 PAL 斜率较高,表明 AUD 组的学习速度较慢。这种影响在巩固阶段没有观察到。

结论

结果表明,与对照组相比,那些患有 AUD 的人在避免负面后果方面学习能力较差。研究结果还表明,通过关注任务早期的学习率来测量 PAL 率可能比仅仅观察总虚报率更好地反映 PAL 学习情况。

相似文献

1
Slower rates of learning to inhibit behavior in alcohol use disorder.在酒精使用障碍中,行为抑制的学习速度较慢。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Feb;36(1):39-43. doi: 10.1037/adb0000599. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
Learning to resist the urge: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial investigating alcohol-specific inhibition training in abstinent patients with alcohol use disorder.学会抵制冲动:一项双盲、随机对照试验,研究在酒精使用障碍的戒酒患者中进行的酒精特异性抑制训练。
Trials. 2019 Jul 5;20(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3505-2.
3
Disaggregating within- and between-person effects of affect on drinking behavior in a clinical sample with alcohol use disorder.在患有酒精使用障碍的临床样本中,分析情感对饮酒行为的个体内和个体间影响。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Nov;132(8):1051-1059. doi: 10.1037/abn0000875.
4
Alcohol use disorder among adolescents: impact of paternal alcoholism on drinking behavior, drinking motivation, and consequences.青少年酒精使用障碍:父亲酗酒对饮酒行为、饮酒动机及后果的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Feb;21(1):171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03745.x.
5
Effects of Observable Parent Alcohol Consequences and Parent Alcohol Disorder on Adolescent Alcohol Expectancies.可观察到的父母酒精后果和父母酒精障碍对青少年酒精期望的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;44(4):973-982. doi: 10.1111/acer.14298. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Flexibly modeling alcohol use disorder risk: How many drinks should we count?灵活建模酒精使用障碍风险:我们应该计算多少杯酒?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Feb;33(1):50-57. doi: 10.1037/adb0000431. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
7
Early-onset alcoholism with conduct disorder: go/no go learning deficits, working memory capacity, and personality.伴有品行障碍的早发性酒精中毒:停止信号学习缺陷、工作记忆能力和人格
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Feb;26(2):186-206.
8
Comparing the potential causal influence of two indicators of early alcohol use on later alcohol use disorder symptoms.比较两种早期饮酒指标对后期酒精使用障碍症状的潜在因果影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Apr;129(3):256-265. doi: 10.1037/abn0000474. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
Context and craving among individuals with alcohol use disorder attempting to moderate their drinking.有饮酒障碍的个体试图控制饮酒时的情境和渴求。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec;28(6):677-687. doi: 10.1037/pha0000349. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Alcohol-related context modulates neural correlates of inhibitory control in alcohol dependent patients: Preliminary data from an fMRI study using an alcohol-related Go/NoGo-task.与酒精相关的情境调节酒精依赖患者抑制控制的神经关联:一项使用与酒精相关的Go/NoGo任务的功能磁共振成像研究的初步数据。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Feb 1;398:112973. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112973. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Social incentives are stronger predictors of drinking decisions than alcohol incentives in young adults: The role of alcohol use disorder.社会激励比酒精激励更能预测年轻人的饮酒决策:酒精使用障碍的作用。
Alcohol. 2023 May;108:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures.大规模分析自我调节措施的重测信度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5472-5477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818430116. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulation.将新技术和新方法应用于自我调节的本体论研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Feb;101:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Decisions to Attend and Drink at Party Events: The Effects of Incentives and Disincentives and Lifetime Alcohol and Antisocial Problems.
参加派对活动和饮酒的决策:激励和抑制因素以及终生饮酒和反社会问题的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Sep;41(9):1622-1629. doi: 10.1111/acer.13443. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
4
The Effects of a Working Memory Load on Delay Discounting in Those with Externalizing Psychopathology.工作记忆负荷对具有外化精神病理学特征者延迟折扣的影响。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar 1;3(2):202-214. doi: 10.1177/2167702614542279.
5
An information processing/associative learning account of behavioral disinhibition in externalizing psychopathology.外化型精神病理学中行为抑制缺失的信息加工/联想学习解释。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;22(2):122-32. doi: 10.1037/a0035166. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
6
Dimensions of disinhibited personality and their relation with alcohol use and problems.人格解体维度及其与饮酒和问题的关系。
Addict Behav. 2013 Jul;38(7):2352-60. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
7
Impulsivity partially mediates the association between reduced working memory capacity and alcohol problems.冲动性在一定程度上中介了工作记忆容量减少与酒精问题之间的关联。
Alcohol. 2013 Feb;47(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
8
The role of reconsolidation and the dynamic process of long-term memory formation and storage.重新巩固的作用以及长期记忆形成与存储的动态过程。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar 7;5:12. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00012. eCollection 2011.
9
Externalizing psychopathology and behavioral disinhibition: working memory mediates signal discriminability and reinforcement moderates response bias in approach-avoidance learning.外化型精神病理学与行为抑制不足:工作记忆中介了信号辨别力,而强化则调节了趋近-回避学习中的反应偏差。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 May;120(2):336-51. doi: 10.1037/a0022501.
10
Disinhibitory psychopathology and delay discounting in alcohol dependence: personality and cognitive correlates.酒精依赖中的去抑制性精神病理学与延迟折扣:人格及认知关联
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Feb;17(1):51-61. doi: 10.1037/a0014503.