• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物科学提案训练营:结构化的同行和教师反馈提高了学员的提案和资助能力自我效能感。

Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees' proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy.

机构信息

Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Program in Writing and Rhetoric, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243973. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243973
PMID:33370337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7769268/
Abstract

Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research proposals. Its core program is a multi-week Proposal Bootcamp designed to increase the feedback writers receive as they develop and refine their proposals. The Proposal Bootcamp consisted of two-hour weekly meetings that included mini lectures and peer review. Bootcamp participants also attended faculty review workshops to obtain faculty feedback. Postdoctoral trainees were trained and hired as course teaching assistants and facilitated weekly meetings and review workshops. Over the last six years, the annual Bootcamp has provided 525 doctoral students and postdocs with multi-level feedback (peer and faculty). Proposals from Bootcamp participants were almost twice as likely to be funded than proposals from non-Bootcamp trainees. Overall, this structured program provided opportunities for feedback from multiple peer and faculty reviewers, increased the participants' confidence in developing and submitting research proposals, while accommodating a large number of participants.

摘要

撰写资助申请是学术和其他职业成功的必备技能,但为大量学员提供个人反馈极具挑战性。2014 年,我们启动了斯坦福生物科学资助写作学院,为研究生和博士后提供支持,帮助他们撰写研究提案。该学院的核心项目是一个为期数周的提案训练营,旨在增加学员在撰写和完善提案时收到的反馈。提案训练营包括两小时的每周会议,包括小型讲座和同行评审。训练营参与者还参加了教师评审研讨会,以获得教师的反馈。博士后学员接受培训并被聘为课程助教,协助每周会议和评审研讨会。在过去的六年中,年度训练营为 525 名博士生和博士后提供了多层次的反馈(同行和教师)。参加训练营的提案获得资助的可能性是未参加训练营的学员的两倍。总的来说,这个结构化的项目为学员提供了来自多个同行和教师评审人的反馈机会,提高了他们撰写和提交研究提案的信心,同时还能容纳大量的参与者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/893927d39db7/pone.0243973.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/377fbb367497/pone.0243973.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/9d02a5f97576/pone.0243973.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/9b05cf53eee7/pone.0243973.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/ef410f181bce/pone.0243973.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/fb4cdf203fef/pone.0243973.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/164c955cfc30/pone.0243973.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/2337c83e1051/pone.0243973.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/893927d39db7/pone.0243973.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/377fbb367497/pone.0243973.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/9d02a5f97576/pone.0243973.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/9b05cf53eee7/pone.0243973.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/ef410f181bce/pone.0243973.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/fb4cdf203fef/pone.0243973.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/164c955cfc30/pone.0243973.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/2337c83e1051/pone.0243973.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ac3/7769268/893927d39db7/pone.0243973.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees' proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy.生物科学提案训练营:结构化的同行和教师反馈提高了学员的提案和资助能力自我效能感。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243973. eCollection 2020.
2
The Association Between NRMN STAR Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy and Grant Submission.NRMN STAR grantsmanship 自我效能与资助申请之间的关联。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Oct 21;31(4):559-566. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.4.559. eCollection 2021 Fall.
3
Multidisciplinary Mentoring Programs to Enhance Junior Faculty Research Grant Success.多学科指导计划以提高初级教员科研基金申请成功率
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1410-1415. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001620.
4
Grant application outcomes for biomedical researchers who participated in the National Research Mentoring Network's Grant Writing Coaching Programs.参与国家研究指导网络资助写作指导项目的生物医学研究人员的资助申请结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0241851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241851. eCollection 2020.
5
The Proposal Preparation Program: A Group Mentoring, Faculty Development Model to Facilitate the Submission and Funding of NIH Grant Applications.提案准备计划:一种小组指导、教师发展模式,以促进 NIH 资助申请的提交和获得资金。
Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):53-61. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004359.
6
A Multifaceted Mentoring Program for Junior Faculty in Academic Pediatrics.一项针对学术儿科学初级教员的多方面指导计划。
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;28(3):320-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1153476. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Writing Accountability Groups Are a Tool for Academic Success: The Obesity Health Disparities PRIDE Program.写作问责小组是学业成功的工具:肥胖健康差异 PRIDE 计划。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Apr 23;30(2):295-304. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.2.295. eCollection 2020 Spring.
8
Variations of a group coaching intervention to support early-career biomedical researchers in Grant proposal development: a pragmatic, four-arm, group-randomized trial.一种群组辅导干预措施的变化,旨在支持早期职业生物医学研究人员进行资助提案的开发:一项实用的、四臂、群组随机试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03093-w.
9
Early career biomedical grantsmanship self-efficacy: validation of an abbreviated self-assessment tool.早期职业生物医学资助申请自我效能感:简式自我评估工具的验证。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Jun;1445(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13995. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
The Impact of Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy on Early Stage Investigators of The National Research Mentoring Network Steps Toward Academic Research (NRMN STAR).拨款能力自我效能对国家研究指导网络(NRMN)迈向学术研究步骤(NRMN STAR)早期阶段研究人员的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):75-82. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.75. eCollection 2020 Winter.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory mixed-methods sentiment analysis of a social-emotional learning (SEL)-informed grant writing workshop in the biosciences.对生物科学领域一个受社会情感学习(SEL)启发的资助申请书撰写工作坊进行的探索性混合方法情感分析。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2025 Aug 21;26(2):e0021924. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00219-24. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Research productivity and training support for doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences.生物与生物医学科学领域博士生的研究生产力与培训支持
FASEB Bioadv. 2023 Feb 14;5(3):131-148. doi: 10.1096/fba.2022-00117. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Variations of a group coaching intervention to support early-career biomedical researchers in Grant proposal development: a pragmatic, four-arm, group-randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to Optimize Mentoring Relationships for Diverse Biomedical Researchers.优化针对不同生物医学研究人员的指导关系的干预措施。
UI J. 2020 Spring;11(1). Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Early career biomedical grantsmanship self-efficacy: validation of an abbreviated self-assessment tool.早期职业生物医学资助申请自我效能感:简式自我评估工具的验证。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Jun;1445(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13995. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
3
Psychosocial Pathways to STEM Engagement among Graduate Students in the Life Sciences.生命科学领域研究生参与STEM活动的社会心理途径。
一种群组辅导干预措施的变化,旨在支持早期职业生物医学研究人员进行资助提案的开发:一项实用的、四臂、群组随机试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03093-w.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 fall;15(3). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0036.
4
Applied Grant Writing Training for Future Health Communication Researchers: The Health Communication Scholars Program.面向未来健康传播研究者的应用资助写作培训:健康传播学者计划
Health Commun. 2017 Feb;32(2):247-252. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1110686. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
Use of a Grant Writing Class in Training PhD Students.在博士生培养中使用资助申请书撰写课程。
Traffic. 2016 Jul;17(7):803-14. doi: 10.1111/tra.12398. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
It's money! Real-world grant experience through a student-run, peer-reviewed program.这是钱!通过学生运营、同行评审的项目获得真实世界的资助经验。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Fall;12(3):419-28. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-05-0058.
7
Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology.学会提升:通过写作提高通识教育生物学中的批判性思维能力
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):140-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203.
8
Formative assessment: a key to deep learning?形成性评估:深度学习的关键?
Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):509-13. doi: 10.1080/01421590500129159.
9
An evidence-based guide to writing grant proposals for clinical research.撰写临床研究资助申请书的循证指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):274-82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00009.
10
Writing as thinking.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 May;988:233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb06103.x.