Khoury M J, Adams M J, Flanders W D
Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Jan;42(1):89-95.
Although "ecogenetics" seeks to examine genetically mediated differences in susceptibility to environmental agents, researchers often examine the relation between genetic markers and disease without regard to environmental determinants. By using epidemiologic definitions of genotype-environment interaction, it can be shown that the relative risk of disease for the genetic marker is a function of the frequency of exposure to the environmental agent, the strength of interaction between the genotype and the agent, and the specificity of the environmental effect vis-à-vis the genotype. Using examples from the literature, we illustrate under six patterns of genotype-environment interaction that the relative risk associated with the marker can fluctuate markedly. However, with infrequent exposures, the relative risk is close to unity (implying no genetic effect) even in the face of strong genotype-environment interaction. Alternatively, elevated relative risks imply a frequent environmental exposure or a strong pattern of interaction. We suggest that genetic marker-disease associations be evaluated within the context of an epidemiologic study design that considers specific environmental determinants of risk.
尽管“生态遗传学”旨在研究遗传介导的对环境因素易感性的差异,但研究人员在检查遗传标记与疾病之间的关系时,往往不考虑环境决定因素。通过使用基因型 - 环境相互作用的流行病学定义,可以表明,遗传标记导致疾病的相对风险是接触环境因素的频率、基因型与该因素之间相互作用的强度以及环境效应相对于基因型的特异性的函数。我们引用文献中的例子,说明在六种基因型 - 环境相互作用模式下,与标记相关的相对风险可能会有显著波动。然而,对于不常见的暴露情况,即使面对强烈的基因型 - 环境相互作用,相对风险也接近于1(意味着无遗传效应)。相反,相对风险升高意味着频繁的环境暴露或强烈的相互作用模式。我们建议在考虑特定风险环境决定因素的流行病学研究设计背景下评估遗传标记与疾病的关联。