Simon Philipp, Petroff David, Busse David, Heyne Jana, Girrbach Felix, Dietrich Arne, Kratzer Alexander, Zeitlinger Markus, Kloft Charlotte, Kees Frieder, Wrigge Hermann, Dorn Christoph
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Integrated Research and Treatment Center (IFB) Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 21;9(12):931. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120931.
This controlled clinical study aimed to investigate the impact of obesity on plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of meropenem.
Obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m) and age-/sex-matched nonobese (18.5 kg/m ≥ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m) surgical patients received a short-term infusion of 1000-mg meropenem. Concentrations were determined via high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) in the plasma and microdialysate from the interstitial fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous tissue up to eight h after dosing. An analysis was performed in the plasma and ISF by noncompartmental methods.
The maximum plasma concentrations in 15 obese (BMI 49 ± 11 kg/m) and 15 nonobese (BMI 24 ± 2 kg/m) patients were 54.0 vs. 63.9 mg/L (95% CI for difference: -18.3 to -3.5). The volume of distribution was 22.4 vs. 17.6 L, (2.6-9.1), but the clearance was comparable (12.5 vs. 11.1 L/h, -1.4 to 3.1), leading to a longer half-life (1.52 vs. 1.31 h, 0.05-0.37) and fairly similar area under the curve (AUC) (78.7 vs. 89.2 mgh/L, -21.4 to 8.6). In the ISF, the maximum concentrations differed significantly (12.6 vs. 18.6 L, -16.8 to -0.8) but not the AUC (28.5 vs. 42.0 mgh/L, -33.9 to 5.4). Time above the MIC (T > MIC) in the plasma and ISF did not differ significantly for MICs of 0.25-8 mg/L.
In morbidly obese patients, meropenem has lower maximum concentrations and higher volumes of distribution. However, due to the slightly longer half-life, obesity has no influence on the T > MIC, so dose adjustments for obesity seem unnecessary.
这项对照临床研究旨在调查肥胖对美罗培南血浆和组织药代动力学的影响。
肥胖(体重指数(BMI)≥35kg/m²)以及年龄和性别匹配的非肥胖(18.5kg/m²≤BMI≤30kg/m²)外科手术患者接受了1000mg美罗培南的短期输注。给药后长达8小时,通过高效液相色谱-紫外法(HPLC-UV)测定血浆和皮下组织间质液(ISF)微透析液中的浓度。采用非房室方法对血浆和ISF进行分析。
15名肥胖患者(BMI 49±11kg/m²)和15名非肥胖患者(BMI 24±2kg/m²)的血浆最大浓度分别为54.0mg/L和63.9mg/L(差异的95%置信区间:-18.3至-3.5)。分布容积分别为22.4L和17.6L(2.6 - 9.1),但清除率相当(12.5L/h和11.1L/h,-1.4至3.1),导致半衰期更长(1.52小时和1.31小时,0.05 - 0.37),曲线下面积(AUC)相当(78.7mg·h/L和89.2mg·h/L,-21.4至8.6)。在ISF中,最大浓度差异显著(12.6mg/L和18.6mg/L,-16.8至-0.8),但AUC无显著差异(28.5mg·h/L和42.0mg·h/L,-33.9至5.4)。对于0.25 - 8mg/L的最低抑菌浓度(MIC),血浆和ISF中高于MIC(T>MIC)的时间无显著差异。
在病态肥胖患者中,美罗培南的最大浓度较低,分布容积较高。然而,由于半衰期略长,肥胖对T>MIC无影响,因此似乎无需因肥胖调整剂量。