Young Heather M, Miyamoto Sheridan, Henderson Stuart, Dharmar Madan, Hitchcock Margaret, Fazio Sarina, Tang-Feldman Yajarayma
Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):905-914. doi: 10.1177/0193945920983332. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
Patient engagement in research improves trustworthiness of the research findings, increases relevance, and ensures designs include the most meaningful outcomes for patients living with targeted health conditions. The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) requires engagement of patient stakeholders. There is limited description of both the context and the processes used to engage patients effectively. This paper discusses engagement activities, roles and responsibilities, value of a Patient Advisory Board (PAB), and lessons learned. Data include program notes, research team reflections, PCORI reporting, and an advisor survey.Facilitators of meaningful engagement included creating a learning community, co-defining clear roles, reimbursing advisors, establishing clear avenues for communication, and welcoming unique contributions. Lessons learned were the value of time, the importance of building trust, and the benefits of diverse perspectives. The approach to meaningful engagement of patient advisors in research has the potential to enhance the relevance and usefulness of research for improving lives.
患者参与研究可提高研究结果的可信度,增强相关性,并确保研究设计纳入针对特定健康状况患者最有意义的结果。以患者为中心的结果研究机构(PCORI)要求患者利益相关者参与。关于有效让患者参与的背景和过程的描述有限。本文讨论了参与活动、角色与职责、患者咨询委员会(PAB)的价值以及经验教训。数据包括项目记录、研究团队反思、PCORI报告以及一项顾问调查。有意义参与的促进因素包括创建学习社区、共同明确角色、补偿顾问、建立清晰的沟通渠道以及欢迎独特贡献。经验教训包括时间的价值、建立信任的重要性以及多元观点的益处。让患者顾问有意义地参与研究的方法有可能提高研究对改善生活的相关性和实用性。