Feddersen Theresa V, Hernandez-Tamames Juan A, Franckena Martine, van Rhoon Gerard C, Paulides Margarethus M
Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;13(1):31. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010031.
Hyperthermia treatments in the clinic rely on accurate temperature measurements to guide treatments and evaluate clinical outcome. Currently, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) is the only clinical option to non-invasively measure 3D temperature distributions. In this review, we evaluate the status quo and emerging approaches in this evolving technology for replacing conventional dosimetry based on intraluminal or invasively placed probes. First, we define standardized MRT performance thresholds, aiming at facilitating transparency in this field when comparing MR temperature mapping performance for the various scenarios that hyperthermia is currently applied in the clinic. This is based upon our clinical experience of treating nearly 4000 patients with superficial and deep hyperthermia. Second, we perform a systematic literature review, assessing MRT performance in (I) clinical and (II) pre-clinical papers. From (I) we identify the current clinical status of MRT, including the problems faced and from (II) we extract promising new techniques with the potential to accelerate progress. From (I) we found that the basic requirements for MRT during hyperthermia in the clinic are largely met for regions without motion, for example extremities. In more challenging regions (abdomen and thorax), progress has been stagnating after the clinical introduction of MRT-guided hyperthermia over 20 years ago. One clear difficulty for advancement is that performance is not or not uniformly reported, but also that studies often omit important details regarding their approach. Motion was found to be the common main issue hindering accurate MRT. Based on (II), we reported and highlighted promising developments to tackle the issues resulting from motion (directly or indirectly), including new developments as well as optimization of already existing strategies. Combined, these may have the potential to facilitate improvement in MRT in the form of more stable and reliable measurements via better stability and accuracy.
临床中的热疗依赖于精确的温度测量来指导治疗并评估临床结果。目前,磁共振测温法(MRT)是唯一一种用于非侵入性测量三维温度分布的临床方法。在本综述中,我们评估了这项不断发展的技术的现状和新兴方法,以取代基于腔内或侵入性放置探头的传统剂量测定法。首先,我们定义了标准化的MRT性能阈值,旨在在比较热疗目前在临床中应用的各种场景下的磁共振温度映射性能时,促进该领域的透明度。这是基于我们治疗近4000例浅表和深部热疗患者的临床经验。其次,我们进行了系统的文献综述,评估了(I)临床和(II)临床前论文中的MRT性能。从(I)中我们确定了MRT的当前临床状况,包括面临的问题,从(II)中我们提取了有潜力加速进展的有前景的新技术。从(I)中我们发现,对于无运动的区域,例如四肢,临床热疗期间MRT的基本要求在很大程度上得到了满足。在更具挑战性的区域(腹部和胸部),自20多年前临床引入MRT引导的热疗以来,进展一直停滞不前。进展的一个明显困难是性能没有或没有统一报告,而且研究往往省略了关于其方法的重要细节。发现运动是阻碍准确MRT的常见主要问题。基于(II),我们报告并强调了有前景的进展,以解决由运动(直接或间接)导致的问题,包括新进展以及对现有策略的优化。综合起来,这些可能有潜力通过提高稳定性和准确性,以更稳定和可靠的测量形式促进MRT的改进。