Seol Bo Ram, Lee Sang Yoon, Kim Yu Jeong, Kim Young Kook, Jeoung Jin Wook, Park Ki Ho
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Veterans Health Service (VHS) Medical Center, Seoul 05368, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 26;10(1):59. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010059.
(1) Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used during trabeculectomy. However, there is no consensus on which concentration should be used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. (2) Methods: Thirty-six eyes (36 glaucoma patients) were randomized to undergo a trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL or 0.4 mg/mL of MMC. The success rate was evaluated according to three criteria: (A) intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤18 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20%; (B) IOP ≤15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥25%; (C) IOP ≤12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30%. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to identify the predictive factors for failure. Immunohistochemical procedures for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) were performed on Tenon's tissue. Bleb morphology was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of complications. (3) Results: Of the 36 eyes, 19 underwent trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL of MMC and 17 with 0.4 mg/mL. The success rates were 75%, 67%, and 47% at 6 months for criteria A, B, and C, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. High MMP-9 staining and low preoperative IOP were associated with failure (hazard ratio (HR), 5.556; = 0.033, and HR, 0.936; = 0.033). Complications included hypotony in two eyes (6%), hyphema in one eye (3%), and choroidal detachment in one eye (3%). (4) Conclusions: Trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC showed similar IOP-control effects to those recorded in previous studies, along with a low rate of complications. There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between the 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL MMC groups.
(1)背景:丝裂霉素C(MMC)常用于小梁切除术。然而,对于应使用何种浓度尚无共识。我们旨在比较0.2mg/mL和0.4mg/mL的MMC在接受小梁切除术的眼中的疗效和安全性。(2)方法:36只眼(36例青光眼患者)被随机分配接受使用0.2mg/mL或0.4mg/mL MMC的小梁切除术。根据三个标准评估成功率:(A)眼压(IOP)≤18mmHg且眼压降低≥20%;(B)IOP≤15mmHg且眼压降低≥25%;(C)IOP≤12mmHg且眼压降低≥30%。采用Cox比例风险模型确定失败的预测因素。对眼球筋膜组织进行基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)的免疫组织化学检测。评估滤过泡形态。根据并发症发生率评估安全性。(3)结果:36只眼中,19只接受了使用0.2mg/mL MMC的小梁切除术,17只接受了使用0.4mg/mL MMC的小梁切除术。在6个月时,标准A、B和C的成功率分别为75%、67%和47%。两组之间无显著差异。MMP-9高染色和术前低眼压与失败相关(风险比(HR),5.556;P = 0.033,以及HR,0.936;P = 0.033)。并发症包括2只眼(6%)发生低眼压,1只眼(3%)发生前房积血,1只眼(3%)发生脉络膜脱离。(4)结论:使用0.2mg/mL和0.4mg/mL MMC的小梁切除术显示出与先前研究记录相似的眼压控制效果,且并发症发生率较低。0.2mg/mL和0.4mg/mL MMC组在疗效或安全性方面无显著差异。