文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

退行性颈椎脊髓病的各种手术治疗方法比较:倾向评分匹配分析

A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

作者信息

Lee Nathan J, Kim Jun S, Park Paul, Riew K Daniel

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1109-1118. doi: 10.1177/2192568220976092. Epub 2020 Dec 30.


DOI:10.1177/2192568220976092
PMID:33375849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210244/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes for Laminoplasty, Laminectomy/fusion, and ACDF. METHODS: We utilized a prospectively-collected, multi-center national database with a propensity score matching algorithm to compare the short-term outcomes for laminoplasty, laminectomy/fusion, and multi-level (3) ACDF (with and without corpectomy). Bivariate analyses involved both chi-square/fisher exact test and t-test/ANOVA on perioperative factors. Multivariate analyses were performed to determined independent risk factors for short term outcomes. RESULTS: 546 patients remained after propensity score matching, with 182 patients in each cohort. ACDF required the longest operative time 188 ± 79 versus laminectomy/fusion (169 ± 75, p = 0.017), and laminoplasty (167 ± 66, p = 0.004). ACDF required the shortest hospital stay (LOS ≥ 2: ACDF 56.6%, laminoplasty 89.6%, laminectomy/fusion 93.4%, p < 0.05). ACDF had lower overall complications (ACDF 3.9%, laminoplasty 7.7%, laminectomy/fusion 11.5%, p < 0.05), mortality (ACDF 0%, laminoplasty 0.55%, laminectomy/fusion 2.2%, p < 0.05), and unplanned readmissions (ACDF 4.4%, laminoplasty 4.4%, laminectomy/fusion 9.9%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were seen in the other outcomes including DVT/PT, acute renal failure, UTI, stroke, cardiac complications, or sepsis. In the multivariate analysis, laminectomy/fusion (OR 17, reference: ACDF) and laminoplasty (OR10, reference: ACDF) were strong independent risk factors for LOS ≥ 2 days. Laminectomy/fusion (OR 3.2, reference: ACDF) was an independent predictor for any adverse events 30-days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laminectomy/fusion carries the highest risk for morbidity, mortality, and unplanned readmissions in the short-term postoperative period. Laminoplasty and ACDF cases carry similar short-term complications risks. ACDF is significantly associated with the longest operative duration and shortest LOS without an increase in individual or overall complications, readmissions, or reoperations.

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。 目的:比较椎板成形术、椎板切除术/融合术和前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的短期疗效。 方法:我们利用一个前瞻性收集的多中心全国数据库,采用倾向评分匹配算法,比较椎板成形术、椎板切除术/融合术和多节段(3节段)ACDF(有或无椎体次全切除术)的短期疗效。对围手术期因素进行双变量分析,采用卡方检验/费舍尔精确检验和t检验/方差分析。进行多变量分析以确定短期疗效的独立危险因素。 结果:倾向评分匹配后剩余546例患者,每组182例。ACDF手术时间最长(188±79分钟),与椎板切除术/融合术(169±75分钟,p = 0.017)和椎板成形术(167±66分钟,p = 0.004)相比。ACDF住院时间最短(住院时间≥2天:ACDF为56.6%,椎板成形术为89.6%,椎板切除术/融合术为93.4%,p < 0.05)。ACDF总体并发症发生率较低(ACDF为3.9%,椎板成形术为7.7%,椎板切除术/融合术为11.5%,p < 0.05),死亡率(ACDF为0%,椎板成形术为0.55%,椎板切除术/融合术为2.2%,p < 0.05)和非计划再入院率(ACDF为4.4%,椎板成形术为4.4%,椎板切除术/融合术为9.9%,p < 0.05)。在其他结局方面,包括深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞、急性肾衰竭、尿路感染、中风、心脏并发症或败血症,未观察到显著差异。在多变量分析中,椎板切除术/融合术(比值比17,参照:ACDF)和椎板成形术(比值比10,参照:ACDF)是住院时间≥2天的强有力独立危险因素。椎板切除术/融合术(比值比3.2,参照:ACDF)是术后30天内任何不良事件的独立预测因素。 结论:椎板切除术/融合术在术后短期内发生发病、死亡和非计划再入院的风险最高。椎板成形术和ACDF病例的短期并发症风险相似。ACDF与最长手术持续时间和最短住院时间显著相关,且个体或总体并发症、再入院或再次手术均未增加。

相似文献

[1]
A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Global Spine J. 2022-7

[2]
Perioperative Complications of Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison Between 3 Procedures.

Global Spine J. 2023-3

[3]
ACDF with the PCB cage-plate system versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011-6

[4]
Surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of a national, administrative, longitudinal database.

Neurosurg Focus. 2016-6

[5]
Reoperation rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical degenerative diseases: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

Spine J. 2016-12

[6]
Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.

Eur Spine J. 2017-1

[7]
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2021-8

[8]
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015-9

[9]
A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010-2020.

Asian Spine J. 2024-4

[10]
Comparison of the Inpatient Complications and Health Care Costs of Anterior versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Patients with Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2019-9-28

引用本文的文献

[1]
Initial Radiographic Outcomes of Titanium Cage Implants in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Review.

Cureus. 2025-6-4

[2]
Recent progress in surgical treatment of cervical spine myelopathy - A narrative review.

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025-5-26

[3]
Lateral position posterior surgery followed by supine position anterior surgery in a single stage (LP-A) for the treatment of cervical spinal cord anterior severe dynamic compression in short-term.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-6-6

[4]
Efficacy and safety of laminoplasty combined with C3 laminectomy for patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Spine J. 2024-10

[5]
Perioperative and safety outcomes following tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion to revise a pseudarthrosis: A multicenter retrospective review of 150 cases.

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024

[6]
Relationship between intervertebral disc height and post operative dysphagia secondary to single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion- a retrospective study.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024-5-10

[7]
Full endoscopic laminotomy decompression versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical spinal stenosis: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-4-5

[8]
A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010-2020.

Asian Spine J. 2024-4

[9]
Failure of Surgical Equipoise in Posterior Cord Syndrome Myelopathy.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023-12-1

[10]
Trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications: 10-year results from a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1095 patients.

Eur Spine J. 2023-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions.

Nat Rev Neurol. 2020-1-23

[2]
The Clinical Implications and Complications of Anterior Versus Posterior Surgery for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neurospine. 2019-9

[3]
Recent advances in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: bibliometric analysis and surgical perspectives.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-9-1

[4]
Short-term Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty and Decompression and Fusion With Instrumentation.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019-9-1

[5]
Comparison of clinical outcomes and safety between laminectomy with instrumented fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019-2

[6]
National Trends in Demographics and Outcomes Following Cervical Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Global Spine J. 2018-5

[7]
Cervical Laminoplasty: Indications, Surgical Considerations, and Clinical Outcomes.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018-4-1

[8]
A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression.

Global Spine J. 2017-9

[9]
Long-term results of a prospective study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

J Orthop Sci. 2018-1

[10]
Risk factors for 30-day outcomes in elective anterior versus posterior cervical fusion: A matched cohort analysis.

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索