Choi Jeffrey Hyun-Kyu, Birring Paramveer Singh, Lee Joshua, Hashmi Sohaib Zafar, Bhatia Nitin Narain, Lee Yu-Po
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Asian Spine J. 2024 Apr;18(2):190-199. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0276. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2020.
To compare the short-term complication rates of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical laminoplasty (LP), and posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCF) in a geriatric population.
The geriatric population in the United States has increased significantly. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is caused by cervical spinal stenosis, and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, the incidence of multilevel DCM requiring surgical intervention is likely to increase. ACDF, LP, and PCF are the most commonly used surgical techniques for treating multilevel DCM. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical technique for the decompression of DCM in geriatric patients.
Patients aged 65 years who had undergone either multilevel ACDF, LP, or PCF for the treatment of DCM were analyzed. Additional analysis was performed by standardizing the data for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification scores and preoperative functional status.
A total of 23,129 patients were identified. Patients with ACDF were younger, more often female, and preoperatively healthier than those in the other two groups. The estimated postoperative mortality and morbidity, mean operation time, and length of hospital stay were the lowest for ACDF, second lowest for LP, and highest for PCF. The readmission and reoperation rates were comparable between ACDF and LP; however, both were significantly lower than PCF.
PCF is associated with the highest risk of mortality, morbidity, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission in the short-term postoperative period in patients aged 65 years. In contrast, ACDF carries the lowest risk. However, some disease-specific factors may require posterior treatment. For these cases, LP should be included in the preoperative discussion when determining the ideal surgical approach for geriatric patients.
对2010年至2020年美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划数据库进行回顾性分析。
比较老年人群中颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)、颈椎后路椎板成形术(LP)和颈椎后路椎板切除融合术(PCF)的短期并发症发生率。
美国老年人口显著增加。退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)由颈椎管狭窄引起,其患病率随年龄增长而增加。因此,需要手术干预的多节段DCM的发病率可能会上升。ACDF、LP和PCF是治疗多节段DCM最常用的手术技术。然而,老年患者DCM减压的最佳手术技术尚不确定。
分析65岁及以上因治疗DCM接受多节段ACDF、LP或PCF手术的患者。通过对美国麻醉医师协会分类评分和术前功能状态的数据进行标准化,进行了额外的分析。
共识别出23129例患者。ACDF组患者比其他两组患者更年轻,女性更多,术前健康状况更好。ACDF组术后估计死亡率和发病率、平均手术时间和住院时间最低,LP组次之,PCF组最高。ACDF组和LP组的再入院率和再次手术率相当;然而,两者均显著低于PCF组。
在65岁患者术后短期内,PCF与最高的死亡、发病、计划外再次手术和计划外再入院风险相关。相比之下,ACDF风险最低。然而,一些疾病特异性因素可能需要后路治疗。对于这些病例,在确定老年患者的理想手术方式时,术前讨论应包括LP。