Pinheiro Barcessat Ana Rita, Nolli Bittencourt Marina, Góes Gonçalves Rebeca, Goncalves de Oliveira Cruz Ana Vitoria, Coelho Pereira José Alfredo, Bechelli Fabio Augusto, Rinaldi Arianna
Health and Biological Sciences Department, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil.
Department of Nursing, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Dec 21;13:1247-1256. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S287143. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of two different modalities of administration of the neuro psycho physical optimization (NPPO) neuromodulation treatment, applied with radio electric asymmetric conveyer (REAC) biotechnology devices. Both the modalities are aimed at improving the strategies to deal with and optimize the allostatic response to environmental stressors and exposome. This allows to reduce the dysfunctional adaptive behavior patterns, which underlie many neuropsychological symptoms and pathologies, and to improve the symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.
From a population of subjects experiencing at least two of the three symptoms depression, anxiety and stress, the selection of pre and post-treatment Depression, Anxiety, Stress 21 items scale (DASS 21) data was made proceeding with a reverse chronological recruitment mechanism, until reaching 150 subjects for each of the 2 groups. The first group was treated with the neuro psycho physical optimization treatment (NPPO), which is the punctiform modality of administration on the auricle pavilion, and the second group was treated with the neuro psycho physical optimization treatment, which is the area modality of administration applied by the planar probe on the cervicobrachial area (NPPO-CB).
The Wilcoxon signs test confirmed the differences in scores in pre and post-treatment DASS-21. The comparison between the two groups data and the comparison across groups data showed that NPPO and NPPO-CB have the same efficacy in reducing the symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, after a single treatment cycle. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05.
This is the first efficacy descriptive comparison between the two different modalities of administration of the NPPO treatment, as different options for the same clinical indication.
本回顾性研究的目的是比较两种不同方式的神经心理生理优化(NPPO)神经调节治疗的效果,该治疗采用无线电不对称输送(REAC)生物技术设备进行。这两种方式均旨在改善应对和优化对环境应激源及暴露组的应激反应的策略。这有助于减少功能失调的适应性行为模式,这些模式是许多神经心理症状和病症的基础,并改善抑郁、焦虑和压力症状。
从患有抑郁、焦虑和压力这三种症状中至少两种症状的受试者群体中,采用逆向时间顺序招募机制选取治疗前后的抑郁、焦虑、压力21项量表(DASS 21)数据,直至每组达到150名受试者。第一组接受神经心理生理优化治疗(NPPO),即耳廓上的点状给药方式,第二组接受神经心理生理优化治疗,即通过平面探头在颈臂区域应用的区域给药方式(NPPO-CB)。
Wilcoxon符号检验证实了治疗前后DASS-21评分的差异。两组数据之间的比较以及跨组数据的比较表明,在一个治疗周期后,NPPO和NPPO-CB在减轻抑郁、焦虑和压力症状方面具有相同的疗效。统计学显著性设定为p<0.05。
这是首次对NPPO治疗的两种不同给药方式进行疗效描述性比较,作为同一临床适应症的不同选择。