Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Department of Gender Studies & The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2021;47(3):238-252. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1856987. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
In this study, we surveyed a sample of U.S. undergraduates and internet-based participants ( = 495) about their experiences during/after romantic infidelity (affairs), and their initial motivations to engage in infidelity. Meaningful associations emerged between motivation and experience variables. Dyadic motivations (e.g., anger at one's partner, lack of love) were linked with longer affairs, more public dates with affair partners, and primary relationship dissolution. Conversely, non-dyadic situational motivations (e.g., feeling stressed or intoxicated) were linked with shorter affairs, less satisfying sex during affairs, and lower rates of disclosure and dissolution. These findings suggest meaningful infidelity typologies and may aid researchers and practitioners in helping others resolve relational conflicts.
在这项研究中,我们调查了一组美国本科生和基于互联网的参与者( = 495),了解他们在浪漫出轨(外遇)期间/之后的经历,以及他们最初出轨的动机。动机和体验变量之间存在有意义的关联。对偶动机(例如,对伴侣的愤怒,缺乏爱)与较长的外遇时间、与外遇伴侣更多的公开约会以及主要关系破裂有关。相反,非对偶情境动机(例如,感到压力或醉酒)与较短的外遇时间、外遇期间较少的满意性生活以及较低的披露和关系破裂率有关。这些发现表明存在有意义的外遇类型,这可能有助于研究人员和从业者帮助他人解决关系冲突。