Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, and Insurance Services Division, UPMC Health Plan, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):112-117. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.112.
List prices of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors drastically increased during the last decade, but previous research has shown that half of these increases were offset by rising manufacturer discounts. It remains unclear to what extent manufacturers' discounts have offset increases in list prices of each self-administered injectable TNF inhibitor. Evaluating trends in net prices and discounts at the product level will be paramount in understanding the role of competition in the biologic market. To (a) describe product-level changes in net prices of each self-administered injectable TNF inhibitor available in 2007-2019 and (b) quantify to what extent manufacturer discounts have offset increases in list prices. We obtained 2007-2019 pricing data for etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab from the investment firm SSR Health, which uses company-reported sales to estimate net prices and discounts for brand products manufactured by publicly traded companies. For each drug and year, we calculated annual costs of treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on list and net prices and discounts in Medicaid and other payers. From 2007-2019, list prices of etanercept and adalimumab increased by 293% and 295%, respectively; however, discounts offset 47% and 45% of these increases, leading to net price increases of 171% and 203%. List prices of golimumab and certolizumab increased by 183% and 182%, respectively, but with discounts offsetting 58% and 59% of these increases, net prices increased by 103% and 109%. Net prices of golimumab started to decrease after 2016, while net prices of adalimumab and certolizumab experienced their first drop in 2019. Across the study period, discounts in Medicaid and in other payers increased, respectively, from 21% to 85% and 6% to 32% for etanercept; from 26% to 88% and 19% to 35% for adalimumab; from 28% to 63% and 22% to 46% for golimumab; and from 29% to 83% and 27% to 47% for certolizumab. Despite growing manufacturer discounts, net prices of self-administered injectable TNF inhibitors still increased at a mean annual rate of 9.6% in 2007-2019. This led to net prices tripling for adalimumab and more than doubling for etanercept, golimumab, and certolizumab. This study was funded by the Myers Family Foundation. Hernandez is funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (grant number K01HL142847). Funding sources had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Hernandez has served on Pfizer's scientific advisory board. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
肿瘤坏死因子 (TNF) 抑制剂的目录价格在过去十年中大幅上涨,但之前的研究表明,这些涨幅中有一半被制造商的折扣所抵消。制造商的折扣在多大程度上抵消了每种自我注射 TNF 抑制剂目录价格的上涨,这一点仍不清楚。评估产品层面的净价格和折扣趋势对于理解竞争在生物市场中的作用至关重要。目的:(a) 描述 2007-2019 年可获得的每种自我注射 TNF 抑制剂的产品层面净价格变化,(b) 量化制造商折扣在多大程度上抵消了目录价格的上涨。我们从投资公司 SSR Health 获得了 2007-2019 年依那西普、阿达木单抗、西妥昔单抗和戈利木单抗的定价数据,该公司使用公司报告的销售额来估计上市产品的净价格和折扣由上市公司生产。对于每种药物和年份,我们根据医疗补助和其他支付者的目录和净价格和折扣计算了类风湿关节炎患者的年度治疗成本。2007-2019 年,依那西普和阿达木单抗的目录价格分别上涨了 293%和 295%;然而,折扣分别抵消了这些涨幅的 47%和 45%,导致净价格分别上涨了 171%和 203%。戈利木单抗和西妥昔单抗的目录价格分别上涨了 183%和 182%,但由于折扣分别抵消了这些涨幅的 58%和 59%,净价格分别上涨了 103%和 109%。戈利木单抗的净价格自 2016 年以来开始下降,而阿达木单抗和西妥昔单抗的净价格在 2019 年首次出现下降。在整个研究期间,医疗补助和其他支付者的折扣分别从依那西普的 21%增加到 85%和从 6%增加到 32%;从阿达木单抗的 26%增加到 88%和从 19%增加到 35%;从戈利木单抗的 28%增加到 63%和从 22%增加到 46%;从西妥昔单抗的 29%增加到 83%和从 27%增加到 47%。尽管制造商的折扣不断增加,但在 2007-2019 年期间,自我注射 TNF 抑制剂的净价格仍以每年 9.6%的速度增长。这导致阿达木单抗的净价格翻了三倍,依那西普、戈利木单抗和西妥昔单抗的净价格翻了一番以上。本研究由迈尔斯家族基金会资助。埃尔南德斯由美国国立卫生研究院(赠款号 K01HL142847)资助。资金来源在研究的设计和实施、数据的收集、管理、分析和解释、手稿的准备、审查或批准、或提交手稿出版的决定方面没有任何作用。埃尔南德斯曾担任辉瑞公司的科学顾问委员会成员。其他作者没有什么可透露的。