Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Glenrose Rehabilitation Research, Innovation & Technology (GRRIT) Hub, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 May;18(4):443-457. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1864671. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
This review aims to examine the instruments, approaches, scales, or assessment tools used to evaluate technology acceptance, technology adoption, and usability of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for people living with dementia and their care partners.
A systematic literature review was conducted. Studies that explored the use of instruments, approaches, scales, or assessment tools to evaluate the technology acceptance and usability of ICTs for people living with dementia and their care partners were identified through five databases: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus.
We included 74 out of 2182 papers. The most common scales used included the System Usability Scale (SUS) (11%), the ISONORM 9241/10 Questionnaire (4%), and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) (4%). Most (59%) of the included approaches, however, were bespoke (i.e., created by the authors for a particular study) and were not named. The approaches or tools used to assess technology acceptance, technology adoption, and usability of ICTs that applied to people living with dementia had an average of 15 items and used an average of 5.23 scale points.
There is no clear, standardised approach for assessing the technology acceptance, technology adoption, and usability of ICTs for people living with dementia and their care partners. The findings of this review may be used by academics to design and implement improved and more consistent assessment tools to assess technology acceptance, technology adoption, and usability of ICTs for people living with dementia and their care partners.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe number of ICTs for people with dementia and their care partners that can be used for rehabilitation is increasingThe most commonly recognized assessment tools used in this study were the SUS, ISONORM 9241/10, and PSSUQ questionnaires.For the custom assessment tools, the average number of items included in this study was 15 with five-point bidirectional labelling.There is no clear, standardized approach for assessing the technology acceptance, technology adoption, or usability of ICTs for people with dementia and their care partners.
本综述旨在考察用于评估信息和通信技术（ICT）在认知障碍症患者及其照护者中的技术接受度、技术采用度和可用性的工具、方法、量表或评估工具。
进行了系统文献综述。通过 Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Scopus 这五个数据库，确定了探索用于评估认知障碍症患者及其照护者的 ICT 技术接受度和可用性的工具、方法、量表或评估工具的研究。
我们纳入了 2182 篇论文中的 74 篇。使用最广泛的量表包括系统可用性量表（SUS）（11%）、ISONORM 9241/10 问卷（4%）和使用后系统可用性问卷（PSSUQ）（4%）。然而，大多数（59%）方法都是特定的（即作者为特定研究创建的），且未命名。用于评估认知障碍症患者及其照护者的 ICT 技术接受度、技术采用度和可用性的方法或工具平均包含 15 项内容，平均使用 5.23 个量表点。
目前尚无用于评估认知障碍症患者及其照护者的 ICT 技术接受度、技术采用度和可用性的明确、标准化方法。本综述的结果可供学者设计和实施改进的、更一致的评估工具，以评估认知障碍症患者及其照护者的 ICT 技术接受度、技术采用度和可用性。
认知障碍症患者及其照护者可使用的 ICT 数量不断增加。
本研究中最常被认可的评估工具是 SUS、ISONORM 9241/10 和 PSSUQ 问卷。
对于定制评估工具，本研究中平均包含 15 项内容，采用五点双向标记。
目前尚无用于评估认知障碍症患者及其照护者的 ICT 技术接受度、技术采用度或可用性的明确、标准化方法。
