Zhang Airong, Jakku Emma
Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Brisbane 4102, Australia.
Land and Water, CSIRO, Brisbane 4102, Australia.
Foods. 2020 Dec 28;10(1):56. doi: 10.3390/foods10010056.
Understanding consumer food preferences can provide agribusinesses with a competitive advantage through meeting consumers' needs. Consumers' preferences for food attributes have been extensively examined, focusing on specific aspects of attributes with specific food products. It is less clear how consumers evaluate the relative importance of the key food attributes in general. Applying the commonly adopted classification of food attributes into endogenous attributes (i.e., safety and freshness) and exogenous attributes (i.e., genetically modified (GM)-free and organic), the relative importance of these attributes for consumers was investigated. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of preferences was explored to identify distinct subgroups of consumers who may differ in valuing various food attributes. An online survey of 489 city dwellers in Australia revealed that the endogenous attributes were regarded as the most important in an order of safety and freshness. The exogenous attributes were rated as much less important. Three profiles with distinctive preferences for food attributes were identified: Not Fussy (12% of participants), Quality First (49%) and Choosy (39%). The findings suggest that consumers value the importance of various food attributes in a hierarchical order, and there is significant heterogeneity in consumers' food preference. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of food policy and agribusiness decision-making.
了解消费者的食物偏好可以通过满足消费者需求,为农业综合企业提供竞争优势。消费者对食物属性的偏好已得到广泛研究,重点关注特定食物产品属性的具体方面。然而,消费者如何总体评估关键食物属性的相对重要性尚不清楚。应用普遍采用的将食物属性分为内生属性(即安全性和新鲜度)和外生属性(即非转基因和有机)的分类方法,研究了这些属性对消费者的相对重要性。此外,还探讨了偏好的异质性,以识别在重视各种食物属性方面可能存在差异的不同消费者亚群体。对澳大利亚489名城市居民的在线调查显示,内生属性按安全性和新鲜度的顺序被视为最重要的。外生属性的重要性被评为要低得多。确定了对食物属性有不同偏好的三种类型:不挑剔型(占参与者的12%)、质量优先型(占参与者的49%)和挑剔型(占参与者的39%)。研究结果表明,消费者按等级顺序重视各种食物属性的重要性,并且消费者的食物偏好存在显著异质性。将在食品政策和农业综合企业决策的背景下讨论这些研究结果的意义。