• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在简单负重任务中使用脊柱外骨骼时,腰痛患者和无症状对照者的主观反应比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Polje 42, SI-6310 Izola, Slovenia.

Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, Muzejski trg 2, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 28;18(1):161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010161.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18010161
PMID:33379316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7795241/
Abstract

Spinal exoskeletons have been suggested as an approach for the prevention and rehabilitation of occupational low back pain (LBP). While the state-of-the-art exoskeletons were shown to substantially unload the back, user acceptance is still limited. Perceived discomfort and restriction of freedom of movement are commonly reported. In this pilot study, we explored the differences in subjective responses and user impressions to using passive spinal exoskeleton during a set of simple lifting tasks between LBP patients ( = 12) and asymptomatic individuals ( = 10). Visual analog scales (0-10) were used for all assessments. Overall, the results showed mostly similar responses or slightly more positive responses to the exoskeleton from LBP patients. Most notably, the LBP patients reported a statistically significant ( = 0.048) higher willingness to use the device daily (5.36 ± 4.05) compared to the control group (2.00 ± 1.85) and also gave the device a higher overall grade (6.58 ± 1.98 vs. 4.30 ± 2.26; = 0.021). This study has demonstrated that individuals with current LBP responded more favorably to the use of the spinal exoskeleton for simple lifting tasks. This implies that current exoskeletons could be appropriate for LBP rehabilitation, but not preventions, as pain-free individuals are less willing to use such devices. Future studies should explore whether different exoskeleton designs could be more appropriate for people with no LBP issues.

摘要

脊柱外骨骼被认为是预防和康复职业性下腰痛(LBP)的一种方法。尽管最先进的外骨骼已被证明能大大减轻背部的负担,但用户的接受程度仍然有限。人们普遍报告感到不适和限制了行动自由。在这项初步研究中,我们探讨了 LBP 患者(n=12)和无症状个体(n=10)在一系列简单的举升任务中使用被动脊柱外骨骼时主观反应和用户印象的差异。所有评估均采用视觉模拟量表(0-10)。总体而言,结果显示 LBP 患者对该外骨骼的反应大多相似,或稍显更积极。值得注意的是,与对照组(2.00 ± 1.85)相比,LBP 患者表示更愿意每天使用该设备(5.36 ± 4.05),差异具有统计学意义( = 0.048),且对该设备的总体评分也更高(6.58 ± 1.98 与 4.30 ± 2.26; = 0.021)。这项研究表明,当前患有 LBP 的个体对外骨骼在简单举升任务中的使用反应更为积极。这意味着当前的外骨骼可能适合 LBP 康复,但不适合预防,因为没有疼痛的个体不太愿意使用此类设备。未来的研究应探讨不同的外骨骼设计是否更适合没有 LBP 问题的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/7795241/c4727e5cfc3a/ijerph-18-00161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/7795241/55acdbebda7d/ijerph-18-00161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/7795241/c4727e5cfc3a/ijerph-18-00161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/7795241/55acdbebda7d/ijerph-18-00161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c81/7795241/c4727e5cfc3a/ijerph-18-00161-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.在简单负重任务中使用脊柱外骨骼时,腰痛患者和无症状对照者的主观反应比较:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 28;18(1):161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010161.
2
Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.被动式脊柱外骨骼对腰痛患者功能表现、不适和用户满意度的短期影响。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):142-152. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09899-7.
3
Can a Novel Light Weight Minimal Support Lifting Exoskeleton Modify Lifting Movement in People without Low Back Pain?新型轻便最小支撑提升外骨骼是否可以改变无腰痛人群的提升动作?
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 5;24(15):5067. doi: 10.3390/s24155067.
4
In-Field Training of a Passive Back Exoskeleton Changes the Biomechanics of Logistic Workers.现场培训被动式背部外骨骼改变了物流工人的生物力学特性。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2024 Jul-Sep;12(3):149-161. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2024.2359371. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.一种用于人工物料搬运的被动式背部支撑外骨骼:减轻重复提举过程中的下背部负荷和代谢消耗。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2022 Jan-Mar;10(1):7-20. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking.被动式躯干外骨骼对举升和行走过程中代谢成本的影响。
Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):903-916. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1602288. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach.被动式躯干外骨骼在腰痛员工中的可接受性及其对自我效能感的影响:混合方法研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):129-141. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09891-1.
8
Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks.在搬运任务中使用背部支撑外骨骼时估算腰椎负荷。
J Biomech. 2023 Jan;147:111439. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111439. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
9
Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.基于模型的上肢外骨骼被动和主动辅助设计在头顶举升作业中的比较。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2021 Jul-Dec;9(3-4):167-185. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Reducing Back Exertion and Improving Confidence of Individuals with Low Back Pain with a Back Exosuit: A Feasibility Study for Use in BACPAC.使用背部外骨骼减轻腰痛患者的背部用力并增强其信心:在 BACPAC 中使用的可行性研究。
Pain Med. 2023 Aug 4;24(Suppl 1):S175-S186. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad003.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Back Exertion and Improving Confidence of Individuals with Low Back Pain with a Back Exosuit: A Feasibility Study for Use in BACPAC.使用背部外骨骼减轻腰痛患者的背部用力并增强其信心:在 BACPAC 中使用的可行性研究。
Pain Med. 2023 Aug 4;24(Suppl 1):S175-S186. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad003.

本文引用的文献

1
Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams.被动式背部支撑外骨骼通过柔性梁改善活动范围。
Front Robot AI. 2018 Jun 21;5:72. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00072. eCollection 2018.
2
Robotic Technology in Pediatric Neurorehabilitation. A Pilot Study of Human Factors in an Italian Pediatric Hospital.机器人技术在儿科神经康复中的应用。意大利一家儿科医院的人因学初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 17;17(10):3503. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103503.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.
一种新型被动式背部支撑外骨骼的生物力学评估
J Biomech. 2020 May 22;105:109795. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109795. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach.被动式躯干外骨骼在腰痛员工中的可接受性及其对自我效能感的影响:混合方法研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):129-141. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09891-1.
5
Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.被动式脊柱外骨骼对腰痛患者功能表现、不适和用户满意度的短期影响。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):142-152. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09899-7.
6
Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons.躯干外骨骼功能评估成套测试的可靠性。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jul;86:103117. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103117. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
7
Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study.终端用户对腰背疼痛人群使用躯干外骨骼的潜在看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Hum Factors. 2020 May;62(3):365-376. doi: 10.1177/0018720819885788. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
SPEXOR passive spinal exoskeleton decreases metabolic cost during symmetric repetitive lifting.SPEXOR 被动式脊柱外骨骼在对称重复举重过程中降低代谢成本。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Feb;120(2):401-412. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04284-6. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting.被动式背部矫形器对对称举升过程中腰部机械载荷的影响。
J Biomech. 2020 Mar 26;102:109486. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109486. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking.被动式躯干外骨骼对举升和行走过程中代谢成本的影响。
Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):903-916. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1602288. Epub 2019 Apr 24.