• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口罩对面部分析和言语感知的影响:对大流行前协议的启示。

Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols.

机构信息

Centre for Neuroscience of Speech, The University of Melbourne, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):3562. doi: 10.1121/10.0002873.

DOI:10.1121/10.0002873
PMID:33379897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7857500/
Abstract

Wearing face masks (alongside physical distancing) provides some protection against infection from COVID-19. Face masks can also change how people communicate and subsequently affect speech signal quality. This study investigated how three common face mask types (N95, surgical, and cloth) affected acoustic analysis of speech and perceived intelligibility in healthy subjects. Acoustic measures of timing, frequency, perturbation, and power spectral density were measured. Speech intelligibility and word and sentence accuracy were also examined using the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Mask type impacted the power distribution in frequencies above 3 kHz for the N95 mask, and above 5 kHz in surgical and cloth masks. Measures of timing and spectral tilt mainly differed with N95 mask use. Cepstral and harmonics to noise ratios remained unchanged across mask type. No differences were observed across conditions for word or sentence intelligibility measures; however, accuracy of word and sentence translations were affected by all masks. Data presented in this study show that face masks change the speech signal, but some specific acoustic features remain largely unaffected (e.g., measures of voice quality) irrespective of mask type. Outcomes have bearing on how future speech studies are run when personal protective equipment is worn.

摘要

佩戴口罩(与保持身体距离一起)可提供针对 COVID-19 感染的一些保护。口罩还可能改变人们的交流方式,进而影响语音信号质量。本研究调查了三种常见的口罩类型(N95、手术和布)如何影响健康受试者的语音声学分析和感知可懂度。测量了定时、频率、微扰和功率谱密度等声学参数。还使用构音障碍语音评估来检查语音可懂度以及单词和句子的准确性。口罩类型影响 N95 口罩超过 3 kHz 的频率以及手术和布口罩超过 5 kHz 的频率的功率分布。主要使用 N95 口罩时,定时和频谱倾斜的测量值会有所不同。无论口罩类型如何,倒谱和谐波噪声比都保持不变。在单词或句子可懂度测量方面,不同条件之间没有差异;但是,所有口罩都会影响单词和句子翻译的准确性。本研究提供的数据表明,口罩会改变语音信号,但某些特定的声学特征(例如,语音质量测量值)在很大程度上不受口罩类型的影响。这些结果对未来佩戴个人防护设备进行语音研究有一定影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/9798cb62ce62/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/49b1ef62588a/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/77dd3f726eb8/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/7e0acff5f764/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/9798cb62ce62/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/49b1ef62588a/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/77dd3f726eb8/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/7e0acff5f764/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6433/7857500/9798cb62ce62/JASMAN-000148-003562_1-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols.口罩对面部分析和言语感知的影响:对大流行前协议的启示。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):3562. doi: 10.1121/10.0002873.
2
Impact of face masks on voice radiation.口罩对面部声音辐射的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):3663. doi: 10.1121/10.0002853.
3
Effect of Face Mask on Voice Production During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.口罩对 COVID-19 大流行期间声音产生的影响:系统综述。
J Voice. 2024 Mar;38(2):446-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Effect of wearing personal protective equipment on acoustic characteristics and speech perception during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间佩戴个人防护装备对声学特性及言语感知的影响。
Appl Acoust. 2022 Aug;197:108940. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108940. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
Influence of surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise.手术口罩和 N95 口罩对噪声环境下言语感知和听力努力的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253874. eCollection 2021.
6
Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.口罩和说话方式会影响母语和非母语语音的视听词识别和记忆。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Jun;149(6):4013. doi: 10.1121/10.0005191.
7
Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.摩擦音的声学特征、共振峰幅度和使用与不使用医用口罩说话的清晰度。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):366-380. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12705. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
Short report on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 face protective equipment on verbal communication.关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型面部防护装备对言语交流影响的简短报告
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3565-3570. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06535-1. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
9
Association of In-Ear Device Use With Communication Quality Among Individuals Wearing Personal Protective Equipment in a Simulated Operating Room.佩戴个人防护装备的个体在模拟手术室中使用入耳式设备与沟通质量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216857. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6857.
10
Speaking with a KN95 face mask: a within-subjects study on speaker adaptation and strategies to improve intelligibility.戴 KN95 口罩说话:一项关于说话者适应和提高可懂度策略的被试内研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 30;7(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00423-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of talker gender and face masks on the speech recognition of 6-year-old children in a classroom.说话者性别和口罩对6岁儿童在教室中语音识别的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 16;13:1430530. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1430530. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of medical mask on voice in patients with dysphonia.医用口罩对发声障碍患者嗓音的影响。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 May 12;11(1):10-16. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.181. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Effects of Distance, Noise, and Personal Respiratory Protective Equipment on Speech Comprehension in Simulated Critical Care Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals.医用、布制和透明口罩对面部语音信号的声学影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Oct;148(4):2371. doi: 10.1121/10.0002279.
2
Face Masks and Respirators in the Fight against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Current Materials, Advances and Future Perspectives.抗击新冠疫情中的口罩和呼吸器:当前材料、进展及未来展望综述
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 29;13(15):3363. doi: 10.3390/ma13153363.
3
Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study.
距离、噪音和个人呼吸防护设备对模拟重症监护环境中言语理解的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;13(4):398. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040398.
4
Comparing in-home telehealth and in-person administration of neuropsychological measures in an outpatient pediatric sample during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,对门诊儿科样本中居家远程医疗和面对面进行神经心理学测量的情况进行比较。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Jul;39(5):1301-1315. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2024.2403734. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
5
The impact of face coverings on audio-visual contributions to communication with conversational speech.面部遮盖物对通过对话语音进行交流的视听效果的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Apr 23;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00552-y.
6
Effects on communication due to face mask use: an integrative review.使用口罩对面部交流的影响:综合评价。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Oct 9;76(4):e20220674. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0674. eCollection 2023.
7
The Impact of Protective Face Coverings on Acoustic Markers in Voice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.防护面罩对语音声学标志物的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 12;12(18):5922. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185922.
8
Multisensory effects of mask wearing on speech intelligibility and the benefit of multilingualism.戴口罩对口音清晰度的多感官影响和多语言的好处。
Codas. 2023 Sep 15;36(1):e20220341. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022341en. eCollection 2023.
9
Effects of face masks on fairness in on-site personnel selection during a pandemic.口罩对疫情期间现场人员选拔公平性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 31;14:1168311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168311. eCollection 2023.
10
Acoustic and perceptual impact of face masks on speech: A scoping review.口罩对面部语音的声学和感知影响:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 25;18(8):e0285009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285009. eCollection 2023.
使用面罩和口罩以尽量减少飞沫扩散和气溶胶形成:一项视频案例研究。
Thorax. 2020 Nov;75(11):1024-1025. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215748. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
Speech-Language Pathology Guidance for Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Multidisciplinary Perspective.COVID-19大流行期间气管切开术的言语语言病理学指南:国际多学科视角
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1320-1334. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00089. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
The airborne lifetime of small speech droplets and their potential importance in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.飞沫在空气中的停留时间及其在 SARS-CoV-2 传播中的重要性
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 2;117(22):11875-11877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006874117. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness.人在讲话时,飞沫和气溶胶的排放与超量排放会随音量增大而增加。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38808-z.
8
Motor speech signature of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: Refining the phenotype.行为变异型额颞叶痴呆的运动言语特征:对表型的精细化。
Neurology. 2017 Aug 22;89(8):837-844. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004248. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
Automatic method of pause measurement for normal and dysarthric speech.正常语音和构音障碍语音停顿测量的自动方法
Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Feb;24(2):141-54. doi: 10.3109/02699200903440983.
10
Standardization of pitch-range settings in voice acoustic analysis.语音声学分析中音调范围设置的标准化。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):318-24. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.318.