• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1331例冷冻乳腺癌标本的DNA流式细胞术及预后因素

DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens.

作者信息

Dressler L G, Seamer L C, Owens M A, Clark G M, McGuire W L

机构信息

Department of Medicine/Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7884.

出版信息

Cancer. 1988 Feb 1;61(3):420-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<420::aid-cncr2820610303>3.0.co;2-0.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<420::aid-cncr2820610303>3.0.co;2-0
PMID:3338012
Abstract

Breast cancer proliferative capacity as determined by the DNA thymidine labeling index, along with estrogen and progesterone receptor status, is highly predictive for risk of relapse and overall survival. Recently, DNA ploidy and proliferative capacity (S-phase fraction [SPF]) as determined by flow cytometry have also shown significant prognostic value. The authors have developed a technique which allows a 50 to 100 mg aliquot of the same frozen breast tumor specimen routinely employed in steroid receptor assays, to be assayed for both DNA ploidy and SPF by flow cytometry. Of the 1331 tumors examined, DNA histograms were evaluable for ploidy in 89% (1184) of specimens examined; 57% of these were aneuploid. Adapting a trapezoidal model to estimate SPF in both diploid and aneuploid tumors, the authors found 81% (1084) to be evaluable for SPF, with a median SPF of 5.8% for the entire population. The median SPF was significantly lower in diploid tumors (2.6%) than in aneuploid tumors (10.3%, P less than 0.0001). Both aneuploidy and high SPF were strongly associated with absence of steroid receptors. Aneuploid tumors showed more striking differences in the frequency of high S-phase values with respect to receptor status and age or menopausal status, whereas diploid but not aneuploid tumors showed lower SPF in node-negative versus node-positive patients. Because it is particularly important to identify the high-risk minority of node-negative patients, the authors examined the node-negative group separately. High SPF subgroups appeared in each category of receptor status and age or menopausal status within the node-negative group, suggesting that SPF will be an independent prognostic factor. With the DNA flow cytometric methods used here, it is now practical to determine ploidy and SPF for nearly every breast cancer patient. These factors, which show associations with established prognostic factors, such as receptor status can now be fully evaluated for their prognostic significance in broad patient populations.

摘要

通过DNA胸苷标记指数所确定的乳腺癌增殖能力,连同雌激素和孕激素受体状态,对复发风险和总体生存率具有高度预测性。最近,通过流式细胞术确定的DNA倍性和增殖能力(S期分数[SPF])也显示出显著的预后价值。作者开发了一种技术,该技术可使在类固醇受体测定中常规使用的同一冷冻乳腺肿瘤标本的50至100毫克等分试样,通过流式细胞术同时检测DNA倍性和SPF。在检查的1331个肿瘤中,89%(1184个)标本的DNA直方图可用于评估倍性;其中57%为非整倍体。采用梯形模型来估计二倍体和非整倍体肿瘤中的SPF,作者发现81%(1084个)可用于评估SPF,整个人群的SPF中位数为5.8%。二倍体肿瘤的SPF中位数(2.6%)显著低于非整倍体肿瘤(10.3%,P小于0.0001)。非整倍体和高SPF均与类固醇受体缺失密切相关。非整倍体肿瘤在高S期值频率方面,相对于受体状态、年龄或绝经状态显示出更显著的差异,而二倍体肿瘤(而非非整倍体肿瘤)在淋巴结阴性患者与淋巴结阳性患者中显示出较低的SPF。由于识别淋巴结阴性患者中的高危少数群体尤为重要,作者单独检查了淋巴结阴性组。在淋巴结阴性组内的每种受体状态、年龄或绝经状态类别中均出现了高SPF亚组,这表明SPF将是一个独立的预后因素。使用此处采用的DNA流式细胞术方法,现在几乎可以为每位乳腺癌患者确定倍性和SPF。这些与已确立的预后因素(如受体状态)相关的因素,现在可以在广泛的患者群体中全面评估其预后意义。

相似文献

1
DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens.1331例冷冻乳腺癌标本的DNA流式细胞术及预后因素
Cancer. 1988 Feb 1;61(3):420-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<420::aid-cncr2820610303>3.0.co;2-0.
2
Short-term significance of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation in breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic markers in a series of 308 patients.乳腺癌中DNA倍体和细胞增殖的短期意义:对308例患者预后标志物的多变量分析
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Aug;52(8):604-11. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.8.604.
3
Mutant p53 expression and DNA analysis in human breast cancer comparison with conventional clinicopathological parameters.人乳腺癌中突变型p53表达及DNA分析与传统临床病理参数的比较
Anticancer Res. 1995 Mar-Apr;15(2):581-6.
4
The value of S-phase and DNA ploidy analysis as prognostic markers for node-negative breast cancer in the Australian setting.在澳大利亚环境中,S期和DNA倍体分析作为淋巴结阴性乳腺癌预后标志物的价值。
Pathology. 1999 May;31(2):90-4. doi: 10.1080/003130299105241.
5
A proposed classification of breast cancer based on kinetic information: derived from a comparison of risk factors in 168 primary operable breast cancers.一种基于动力学信息的乳腺癌分类方法:源自对168例原发性可手术乳腺癌危险因素的比较。
Cancer. 1986 Jan 15;57(2):269-76. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<269::aid-cncr2820570214>3.0.co;2-d.
6
Relationships of DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction and hormone receptor status to tumor stage in breast cancers detected by population screening. The South-East Sweden Breast Cancer Group.
Int J Cancer. 1992 Apr 22;51(1):28-33. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510106.
7
Improving the prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer by combining DNA index and S-phase fraction. A proposed classification of DNA histograms in breast cancer.通过结合DNA指数和S期分数提高DNA流式细胞术在乳腺癌中的预后价值。一种提议的乳腺癌DNA直方图分类。
Cancer. 1988 Nov 15;62(10):2183-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881115)62:10<2183::aid-cncr2820621019>3.0.co;2-b.
8
Practical breast carcinoma cell kinetics: review and update.实用的乳腺癌细胞动力学:综述与更新
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1984;4(2):79-88. doi: 10.1007/BF01806389.
9
A novel flow cytometric steroid hormone receptor assay for paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas: an objective quantification of the steroid hormone receptors and direct correlation to ploidy status and proliferative capacity in a single-tube assay.一种用于石蜡包埋乳腺癌的新型流式细胞术类固醇激素受体检测方法:在单管检测中对类固醇激素受体进行客观定量,并与倍体状态和增殖能力直接相关。
Hum Pathol. 2000 May;31(5):584-92. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.6700.
10
Prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in the locally recurrent, conservatively treated breast cancer patient.DNA 流式细胞术在局部复发、接受保守治疗的乳腺癌患者中的预后价值。
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Dec;10(12):1839-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1839.

引用本文的文献

1
IBCar: Potent Orally Bioavailable Methyl -[5-(3'-Iodobenzoyl)-1-Benzimidazol-2-yl]Carbamate for Breast Cancer Therapy.IBCar:用于乳腺癌治疗的强效口服生物可利用的甲基-[5-(3'-碘苯甲酰基)-1-苯并咪唑-2-基]氨基甲酸酯
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;17(15):2526. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152526.
2
Interactome Analysis of KIN (Kin17) Shows New Functions of This Protein.KIN(Kin17)相互作用组分析显示了该蛋白的新功能。
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021 Jul 22;43(2):767-781. doi: 10.3390/cimb43020056.
3
Past, Present and Future of Flow Cytometry in Breast Cancer - A Systematic Review.
乳腺癌流式细胞术的过去、现在与未来——一项系统综述
EJIFCC. 2019 Nov 25;30(4):423-437. eCollection 2019 Nov.
4
Src and ROCK Kinases Differentially Regulate Mineralization of Human Osteosarcoma Saos-2 Cells.Src 和 ROCK 激酶对人骨肉瘤 Saos-2 细胞矿化的调节作用存在差异。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 12;20(12):2872. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122872.
5
Clinical and biologic features of triple-negative breast cancers in a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up.在一项具有长期随访的大型患者队列中,三阴性乳腺癌的临床和生物学特征。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Dec;136(3):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2315-y. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
6
Inhibition of autophagy and tumor growth in colon cancer by miR-502.miR-502 抑制结肠癌中的自噬和肿瘤生长。
Oncogene. 2013 Mar 21;32(12):1570-9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.167. Epub 2012 May 14.
7
A rapid and optimization-free procedure allows the in vivo detection of subtle cell cycle and ploidy alterations in tissues by flow cytometry.一种快速且无需优化的方法可通过流式细胞术在体内检测组织中细微的细胞周期和倍性改变。
Cell Cycle. 2010 Sep 1;9(17):3584-90. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.17.12831.
8
Mechanism of chemoresistance mediated by miR-140 in human osteosarcoma and colon cancer cells.miR-140介导的人骨肉瘤和结肠癌细胞化疗耐药机制。
Oncogene. 2009 Nov 19;28(46):4065-74. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.274. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
9
Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome.乳腺浸润性小叶癌:肿瘤特征与临床结局
Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(3):R149-56. doi: 10.1186/bcr767. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
10
DNA ploidy analyses in 218 consecutive Pakistani breast cancer patients: does it add anything?
Pathol Oncol Res. 2001;7(2):125-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03032578.