Kaszuba Stephanie V, Cipparrone Nancy, Gordon Alexander C
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, 9000 Waukegan Road, Suite 200, Morton Grove, IL 60053 USA.
Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL USA.
HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):412-419. doi: 10.1007/s11420-020-09792-2. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
The introduction of new devices for total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers surgeons the ability to address deficits in the portfolio. However, once introduced, data regarding the performance of devices is not publicly available until their use is widespread.
PURPOSE/QUESTIONS: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic performance, including patient reported outcomes and radiographic evidence of osseointegration, subsidence, and stress shielding, of the newer Actis femoral component to the Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA), which has an extensive clinical history.
This short-term, retrospective cohort study was a single surgeon series of 330 anterior approach THAs, consisting of 165 cases using the Actis stem and 165 cases using the Corail stem. Both devices were cementless, titanium, tapered, hydroxyapatite-coated stems. They differed in geometry, neck choices, broach philosophy, and collar availability. Data was obtained for 1 year following THA. Functional outcomes were measured with the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR.) survey. Complications were recorded from patient charts, and radiographic analysis was performed for signs of osseointegration, subsidence, and stress shielding.
The groups shared similar demographic characteristics except the Actis population was younger with fewer women. The complication rate did not significantly vary, and no patient required revision within the first year. Radiographically, one patient in each group demonstrated subsidence. No cases exhibited radiolucent lines, and the prevalence of stress shielding at 1 year was comparable. HOOS, JR. scores did not significantly vary at 8 weeks or 1 year.
The Actis stem does not carry an increased risk of device-related complications compared with the Corail implant. Although aspects of bone remodeling differed between groups, Actis achieved radiographic signs of bone ingrowth at the 1-year mark and performed well clinically, with equivalent patient reported outcome scores to the Corail stem.
全髋关节置换术(THA)新器械的引入为外科医生提供了弥补产品组合中不足的能力。然而,一旦引入,器械性能数据在其广泛使用之前不会公开。
目的/问题:本研究的目的是比较新型Actis股骨组件与具有广泛临床历史的Corail柄(美国印第安纳州华沙市的DePuy Synthes公司生产)的临床和影像学表现,包括患者报告的结果以及骨整合、下沉和应力遮挡的影像学证据。
这项短期回顾性队列研究是由一位外科医生进行的330例前路THA系列研究,其中165例使用Actis柄,165例使用Corail柄。两种器械均为非骨水泥型、钛制、锥形、羟基磷灰石涂层柄。它们在几何形状、颈部选择、扩髓理念和颈圈可用性方面存在差异。在THA术后1年获取数据。使用关节置换的髋关节功能障碍和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS,JR.)调查来测量功能结果。从患者病历中记录并发症,并进行影像学分析以评估骨整合、下沉和应力遮挡的迹象。
除了Actis组患者更年轻且女性较少外,两组具有相似的人口统计学特征。并发症发生率没有显著差异,且在第一年内没有患者需要翻修。影像学方面,每组各有一名患者出现下沉。没有病例显示有透光线,且1年时应力遮挡的发生率相当。HOOS,JR.评分在8周或1年时没有显著差异。
与Corail植入物相比,Actis柄不会增加与器械相关并发症的风险。尽管两组之间骨重塑的情况有所不同,但Actis在1年时达到了骨长入的影像学迹象,临床效果良好,患者报告的结果评分与Corail柄相当。