Suppr超能文献

污名与物质使用障碍:临床、研究与倡导议程。

Stigma and substance use disorders: A clinical, research, and advocacy agenda.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Sciences.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2020 Dec;75(9):1300-1311. doi: 10.1037/amp0000744.

Abstract

The United States is currently experiencing an opioid epidemic, with deaths due to opioid overdoses persisting in many communities. This epidemic is the latest wave in a series of global substance use-related public health crises. As a fundamental cause of health inequities, stigma leads to the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), undermines SUD treatment efforts, and drives persistent disparities within these crises. Given their expertise in mental and behavioral health, psychologists are uniquely positioned to play a frontline role in addressing SUD stigma. The goal of this paper is to set an agenda for psychologists to address SUD stigma through clinical care, research, and advocacy. To set the stage for this agenda, key concepts are introduced related to stigma and SUDs, and evidence is reviewed regarding associations between stigma and substance use-related outcomes. As clinicians, psychologists have opportunities to promote resilience to stigma to prevent the development of SUDs, and leverage acceptance and mindfulness approaches to reduce internalized stigma among people with SUDs. As researchers, psychologists can clarify the experiences and impacts of stigma among people with SUDs over time and adapt the stigma-reduction toolbox to address SUD stigma. As advocates, psychologists can call for changes in structural stigma such as policies that criminalize people with SUDs, protest the intentional use of SUD stigma, and adopt stigma-free language in professional and social settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

美国目前正经历阿片类药物泛滥的问题,许多社区的阿片类药物过量死亡人数持续居高不下。这场泛滥是一系列与全球物质使用相关的公共卫生危机中的最新一波。由于污名化是健康不平等的根本原因之一,它导致了物质使用障碍(SUD)的发展,破坏了 SUD 的治疗工作,并导致这些危机中持续存在的差异。鉴于心理学家在心理和行为健康方面的专业知识,他们处于解决 SUD 污名化问题的最前沿。本文的目标是为心理学家制定解决 SUD 污名化的议程,通过临床护理、研究和宣传来实现。为了制定这一议程,介绍了与污名化和 SUD 相关的关键概念,并回顾了污名化与物质使用相关结果之间的关联证据。作为临床医生,心理学家有机会通过促进对污名化的适应力来预防 SUD 的发展,并利用接受和正念方法来减少 SUD 患者的内化污名化。作为研究人员,心理学家可以随着时间的推移,澄清 SUD 患者中污名化的经历和影响,并调整污名化减少工具包,以解决 SUD 污名化问题。作为倡导者,心理学家可以呼吁改变将 SUD 患者定罪的结构性污名化政策,抗议故意使用 SUD 污名化,并在专业和社会环境中采用无污名化语言。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

3
Stigma and the public health agenda for the opioid crisis in America.美国阿片类药物危机的污名化与公共卫生议程。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Stigma and substance use disorders: an international phenomenon.耻辱感与物质使用障碍:一种国际现象。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;30(5):378-388. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000351.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
HIV Stigma, Depressive Symptoms, and Substance Use.艾滋病污名、抑郁症状和物质使用。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020 Jun;34(6):275-280. doi: 10.1089/apc.2020.0021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验