School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Valle de la Oliva Healthcare Centre, Madrid, Spain.
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 31;10(12):e041810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041810.
To analyse the trajectory of empathy throughout the degree programme of medicine in a Spanish school of medicine.
Longitudinal, prospective 5-year study, between October 2014 and June 2019.
Students from a Spanish university of medicine.
Two voluntary cohorts of undergraduate medical students from two different school years were invited to participate (n=135 (cohort 1, C1) and 106 (cohort 2, C2) per school year). Finally, a total number of 174 students (102 (C1, 71.6% women) and 72 (C2, 70.8% women) students, respectively) were monitored for 5 years. Each cohort was divided in two subcohorts of paired and unpaired students that were analysed to check possible social desirability bias.
The Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE).
The cohort of 102 students (C1) monitored between their first and fifth years of study (71.6% women) showed an improvement among paired women of 2.15 points in total JSE score (p=0.01) and 2.39 points in cognitive empathy (p=0.01); in the unpaired female cohort the increase was of 2.32 points (cognitive empathy) (p=0.02). The cohort of 72 students (C2) monitored between their second and sixth years of study (70.8% women) displayed a cognitive empathy increase of 2.32 points (p=0.04) in the paired group of women. There were no significant differences between paired and unpaired results for either cohort. Empathy scores among men did not decrease.
The empathy of medical students at our school did not decline along grade years. In fact, it improved slightly, particularly cognitive empathy, among women. This paper contributes to enlarge data from Europe, where longitudinal studies are scarce. It supports the idea that there may be global geo-sociocultural differences; however, more studies comparing different school settings are needed.
分析西班牙某医学院医学专业学生整个学位课程中的同理心轨迹。
2014 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月进行的纵向、前瞻性 5 年研究。
西班牙某所医学院的学生。
邀请了两个不同学年的本科医学生自愿参加两个队列(每个学年分别有 135 名(队列 1,C1)和 106 名(队列 2,C2)学生)。最终,共有 174 名学生(C1 组 102 名(71.6%女性)和 C2 组 72 名(70.8%女性)学生)被监测了 5 年。每个队列分为配对和非配对学生的两个亚队列进行分析,以检查可能的社会期望偏差。
杰斐逊同理心量表(JSE)。
在第一学年至第五学年期间接受监测的 102 名学生(C1)(71.6%为女性)中,配对女性的总 JSE 评分提高了 2.15 分(p=0.01),认知同理心提高了 2.39 分(p=0.01);非配对女性队列的增加为 2.32 分(认知同理心)(p=0.02)。在第二学年至第六学年期间接受监测的 72 名学生(C2)(70.8%为女性)中,配对女性的认知同理心增加了 2.32 分(p=0.04)。对于两个队列,配对和非配对结果之间均无显著差异。男性的同理心评分没有下降。
我们学校的医学生的同理心并没有随着年级的增长而下降。事实上,女性的同理心,尤其是认知同理心,略有提高。本文有助于扩大来自欧洲的纵向研究数据。这支持了全球地理-社会文化差异的观点;然而,还需要更多比较不同学校环境的研究。