• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 级(GP4≥10%)患者具有与 1 级患者非常相似的恶性潜能,因为存在前列腺导管内癌的风险。

Grade group 2 (10% ≥ GP4) patients have very similar malignant potential with grade group 1 patients, given the risk of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.

Division of Biostatistics and Data Science, Clinical Research Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;26(4):764-769. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01841-4. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-020-01841-4
PMID:33385274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been argued that grade group 2 (GG2) with a low Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) proportion should be an indication for active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the cut-off GP4 proportion for AS remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effect of GP4 proportion and IDC-P on cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) in GG1 and GG2 patients, and identified candidates for AS.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 646 patients with PCa who underwent RP between 2005 and 2014, and whose specimens were of GG1 or GG2 status.

RESULTS

The GGs were as follows: GG1, 25.2% (n = 163); GG2 (5% ≥ GP4), 11.4% (n = 74); GG2 (5% < GP4 ≤ 10%), 25.9% (n = 167); and GG2 (20% ≤ GP4), 37.5% (n = 242). IDC-P was detected in 26 patients (4%), i.e., in 2/167 GG2 (5% < GP4 ≤ 10%; 1%) cases and 24/242 GG2 (20% ≤ GP4; 10%) cases. GG2 patients with IDC-P exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis than did those without IDC-P (P < 0.0001), as did GG2 (20% ≤ GP4) patients without IDC-P (P < 0.05). The GG2 (5% ≥ GP4) and (5% < GP4 ≤ 10%) groups exhibited prognoses similar to those of the GG1 patients. In multivariate analysis, GG2 (20% ≤ GP4) without IDC-P, the presence of IDC-P, and the prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis significantly predicted prognosis (P < 0.05, < 0.0001, and < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that GG2 (GP4 ≤ 10%) patients could be indicated for AS, similar to GG1 patients, given the risk of IDC-P tumors.

摘要

背景

有人认为,低 Gleason 模式 4(GP4)比例的 2 级(GG2)应作为前列腺癌(PCa)主动监测(AS)的指征。然而,用于 AS 的 GP4 比例截止值仍不清楚。在这里,我们评估了 GP4 比例和 IDC-P 对 GG1 和 GG2 患者根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)癌症复发的影响,并确定了 AS 的候选者。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 2005 年至 2014 年间接受 RP 治疗的 646 例 PCa 患者,其标本为 GG1 或 GG2 状态。

结果

GG 为:GG1,25.2%(n=163);GG2(5%≥GP4),11.4%(n=74);GG2(5%<GP4≤10%),25.9%(n=167);GG2(20%≤GP4),37.5%(n=242)。26 例(4%)检测到 IDC-P,即 2/167 GG2(5%<GP4≤10%;1%)病例和 24/242 GG2(20%≤GP4;10%)病例。IDC-P 阳性的 GG2 患者的预后明显差于无 IDC-P 阳性的患者(P<0.0001),无 IDC-P 阳性的 GG2(20%≤GP4)患者的预后也明显差于无 IDC-P 阳性的患者(P<0.05)。GG2(5%≥GP4)和(5%<GP4≤10%)组的预后与 GG1 患者相似。多变量分析显示,无 IDC-P 的 GG2(20%≤GP4)、IDC-P 的存在以及诊断时的前列腺特异性抗原水平显著预测预后(P<0.05,P<0.0001 和 P<0.0001)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,鉴于 IDC-P 肿瘤的风险,GG2(GP4≤10%)患者可考虑进行 AS,类似于 GG1 患者。

相似文献

1
Grade group 2 (10% ≥ GP4) patients have very similar malignant potential with grade group 1 patients, given the risk of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.2 级(GP4≥10%)患者具有与 1 级患者非常相似的恶性潜能,因为存在前列腺导管内癌的风险。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;26(4):764-769. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01841-4. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
2
Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients.筛状结构在预测 2 级前列腺癌患者的结局方面优于 Gleason 模式 4 百分比和三级 Gleason 模式 5。
Histopathology. 2022 Feb;80(3):558-565. doi: 10.1111/his.14590. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
The influence of the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on the grade group system's prognostic performance.前列腺导管内癌的存在对分级分组系统预后性能的影响。
Prostate. 2019 Jul;79(10):1065-1070. doi: 10.1002/pros.23818. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.无筛状结构模式的活检分级分组 2 前列腺癌患者中,格里森模式 4 百分比和 PI-RADS 评分可预测升级。
World J Urol. 2022 Nov;40(11):2723-2729. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04161-6. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后有和无筛状结构的 Grade Group 1 和 Grade Group 2 前列腺癌的临床结局比较。
Histopathology. 2020 Apr;76(5):755-762. doi: 10.1111/his.14064.
6
Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.在 2 级和 3 级前列腺癌中,Gleason 模式 4 的比例和肿瘤体积可预测根治性前列腺切除术后不良的病理分期和切缘状态。
Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):866-873. doi: 10.1002/pros.24183. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Radical prostatectomy cancer grade and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 estimated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with the risk of biochemical recurrence in Grade Group 2 and 3 cancers.根治性前列腺切除术时,通过整体肿瘤分级估计的癌症分级和 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比与 2 级和 3 级癌症生化复发风险的相关性与通过个体肿瘤分级估计的结果不同。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2024 Jul 5;162(1):51-61. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae003.
8
Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups.2014 年分级系统中纳入浸润性筛状和导管内癌可改善前列腺癌活检分级。
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.在根治性前列腺切除术中,Gleason评分≤7(包括三级5级模式)的患者发生区域淋巴结转移的可能性。
BJU Int. 2017 Jun;119(6):872-878. doi: 10.1111/bju.13623. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Prevalence of adverse pathology features in grade group 2 prostatectomy specimens with syn- or metachronous metastatic disease.同时性或异时性转移性疾病的 2 级前列腺切除术标本中不良病理特征的发生率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):345-351. doi: 10.1002/pros.24279. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated with Active Surveillance.接受主动监测的侵袭性前列腺癌患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;15(17):4270. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174270.
2
Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.前列腺导管内癌作为前列腺癌转移的原因:分子图谱
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;14(3):820. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030820.

本文引用的文献

1
Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.中危前列腺癌的主动监测。
BJU Int. 2020 Mar;125(3):346-354. doi: 10.1111/bju.14935. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
2
The influence of the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on the grade group system's prognostic performance.前列腺导管内癌的存在对分级分组系统预后性能的影响。
Prostate. 2019 Jul;79(10):1065-1070. doi: 10.1002/pros.23818. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗 10 年后的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.在预测活检中出现格里森模式 4 的患者的器官局限型前列腺癌方面的局限性:对主动监测的影响。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.076. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Is there any prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma of prostate in initial diagnosed aggressively metastatic prostate cancer?在初诊为侵袭性转移性前列腺癌时,前列腺导管内癌是否具有任何预后影响?
Prostate. 2015 Feb 15;75(3):225-32. doi: 10.1002/pros.22906. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: study design and diagnostic and baseline results of the ProtecT randomised phase 3 trial.局部前列腺癌的主动监测、根治性前列腺切除术或放疗:ProtecT 随机 3 期试验的研究设计及诊断和基线结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1109-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70361-4. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens.前列腺导管内癌在前列腺根治性切除标本中的预后价值。
Prostate. 2014 May;74(6):680-7. doi: 10.1002/pros.22786. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
8
Patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia associated with clinically aggressive prostate cancer.与临床侵袭性前列腺癌相关的高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变模式
Hum Pathol. 1998 Oct;29(10):1119-23. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90423-3.