School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO BOX 71, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
School of Science, RMIT University, PO BOX 71, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Complement Ther Med. 2021 Mar;57:102657. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102657. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a clinical trial protocol of the herbal seeds Ziziphus spinosa (ZS) for people with insomnia.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over feasibility trial in Melbourne, Australia.
After two-week run-in participants were randomized to either ZS (encapsulated granules; 2 g daily) or placebo for four weeks. After four-weeks wash-out, participants swapped to the other treatment for four weeks.
Sleep quality assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Quality of life, mood, functional impairment and sleep parameters were also assessed.
Twelve participants were randomized and completed both periods of cross-over (six in each sequence). Feasibility endpoints were acceptable. Improvements for sleep quality measured on the PSQI were statistically significant during the ZS treatment periods compared to placebo (t = -2.276, df = 10, 95 % CI -3.3 to -0.04, p = 0.046). There was no evidence of any significant carryover effects. However, there were period effects. Other outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the treatments. Subjective sleep parameters measured on sleep diaries showed improvements after ZS in terms of total sleep time, sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency, but not after placebo. ZS was well tolerated with only minor adverse events.
ZS is an acceptable and well-tolerated herbal candidate for the treatment of insomnia. The feasibility objectives of this study were achieved and ZS improved both subjective sleep quality and quantity compared to placebo. ZS should be explored in future clinical trials.
评估实施一项关于酸枣仁(ZS)治疗失眠的临床试验方案的可行性。
澳大利亚墨尔本的一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉可行性试验。
在两周的导入期后,参与者被随机分配至 ZS(胶囊颗粒;每天 2 克)或安慰剂治疗组,为期四周。在四周的洗脱期后,参与者换用另一种治疗方案,为期四周。
用失眠严重程度指数和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量。还评估了生活质量、情绪、功能障碍和睡眠参数。
12 名参与者被随机分配并完成了交叉试验的两个周期(每个序列各 6 名)。可行性终点是可接受的。与安慰剂相比,在 ZS 治疗期间,PSQI 测量的睡眠质量改善具有统计学意义(t=-2.276,df=10,95%置信区间-3.3 至-0.04,p=0.046)。没有证据表明存在明显的交叉效应。然而,存在周期效应。其他结果显示,两种治疗方法之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在睡眠日记中测量的主观睡眠参数显示,ZS 组在总睡眠时间、睡眠效率和入睡潜伏期方面有改善,但安慰剂组没有。ZS 耐受性良好,仅有轻微的不良反应。
ZS 是一种可接受且耐受良好的治疗失眠的草药候选药物。本研究的可行性目标已达成,与安慰剂相比,ZS 改善了主观睡眠质量和数量。ZS 应在未来的临床试验中进一步探讨。