Suppr超能文献

固定剂量奈妥吡坦联合帕洛诺司琼治疗癌症患者慢性恶心:一项双盲、安慰剂导入的先导随机临床试验。

Fixed-Dose Netupitant and Palonosetron for Chronic Nausea in Cancer Patients: A Double-Blind, Placebo Run-in Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Aug;62(2):223-232.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

No clinical trials have examined the effect of netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) on chronic nausea in patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVES

In this pilot randomized trial, we assessed the efficacy of NEPA and placebo on chronic nausea.

METHODS

This double-blind, parallel, randomized trial enrolled patients with cancer and chronic nausea for at least 1 month, intensity ≥4/10 and not on moderately or highly emetogenic systemic therapies. Patients started with a placebo run-in period from days 1 to 5; those without a placebo response proceeded to the double-blinded phase between days 6 to 15 (NEPA: placebo 2:1 ratio). The primary outcome was within-group change in average nausea over the 24 hours on a 0-10 numeric rating scale between day 5 and 15.

RESULTS

Among the 53 enrolled patients, 46 proceeded to placebo run-in and 33 had blinded treatment (22 NEPA and 11 placebo). We observed a statistically significant within-group improvement in nausea numeric rating scale between day 5 and 15 in the NEPA group (mean change, -2.0; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.8) and the placebo group (mean change, -2.3; 95% CI, -3.9 to -0.7). A complete response was achieved in 8 (38%) patients in the NEPA group and 2 (20%) in the placebo group by day 15. No grade 3-4 toxicities were attributed to NEPA. There were no statistically significant between-group differences for the primary/secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

NEPA and placebo were associated with similar magnitude of within-group improvement in chronic nausea without significant between-group differences (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03040726).

摘要

背景

尚无临床试验研究奈妥匹坦/帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)对癌症患者慢性恶心的影响。

目的

在这项初步随机试验中,我们评估了 NEPA 和安慰剂对慢性恶心的疗效。

方法

这项双盲、平行、随机试验纳入了至少有 1 个月慢性恶心且强度≥4/10 且未接受中度或高度致吐性全身治疗的癌症患者。患者先进行为期 5 天的安慰剂导入期;如果没有安慰剂反应,则在第 6 至 15 天进行双盲阶段(NEPA:安慰剂 2:1 比例)。主要结局是在第 5 天至第 15 天之间,0-10 数字评分量表上 24 小时内平均恶心的组内变化。

结果

在 53 名入组患者中,46 名患者进入安慰剂导入期,33 名患者接受了盲法治疗(22 名 NEPA 和 11 名安慰剂)。我们观察到 NEPA 组和安慰剂组的恶心数字评分量表在第 5 天至第 15 天之间均有统计学显著的组内改善(NEPA 组平均变化-2.0;95%CI,-3.1 至-0.8;安慰剂组平均变化-2.3;95%CI,-3.9 至-0.7)。在第 15 天,NEPA 组有 8 名(38%)患者达到完全缓解,安慰剂组有 2 名(20%)患者达到完全缓解。没有 3-4 级毒性归因于 NEPA。主要/次要结局无统计学显著的组间差异。

结论

NEPA 和安慰剂在慢性恶心方面都有相似程度的组内改善,且无显著的组间差异(Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03040726)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a01a/11875842/36b33704db8e/nihms-2052952-f0001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验