Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, ENT&HNS Clinic, Talatpaşa Boulevard No:44, Altındağ, 06230, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug;278(8):2869-2874. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06556-w. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
To evaluate, both subjectively and objectively, whether turbinate outfracture provides any additional benefit in the treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy when combined with radiofrequency ablation.
The study was conducted on 58 patients diagnosed with inferior turbinate hypertrophy. The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the treatment they receive. Group A consisted of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation and Group B included patients undergoing turbinate outfracture in combination with radiofrequency ablation. For the purposes of objective evaluation, all patients underwent acoustic rhinometry and anterior rhinomanometry preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. In addition, for subjective evaluation, the patients completed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire. Postoperative changes in objective and subjective parameters in both groups versus the preoperative period and their differences were compared statistically.
In Group A, mean postoperative minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) and nasal volume (NV) values and NOSE scores were significantly greater compared to those obtained in the preoperative period. Similarly, Group B showed significantly greater mean postoperative MCA, NV and NOSE score values compared to the preoperative period. In Group A and B, mean postoperative total nasal resistance (TNR) value was significantly lower in comparison to the preoperative period. The differences in mean preoperative and postoperative MCA, NV, TNR and NOSE scores were significantly greater in Group B versus Group A.
The addition of turbinate outfracture to inferior turbinate radiofrequency ablation treatment provides both objective and subjective benefits in the resolution of nasal obstruction.
客观和主观评估下鼻甲射频消融联合鼻甲外扩术治疗下鼻甲肥大是否有额外获益。
研究纳入了 58 例下鼻甲肥大患者,根据治疗方法将患者分为两组,A 组为行下鼻甲射频消融术的患者,B 组为行鼻甲外扩术联合下鼻甲射频消融术的患者。术前及术后 6 个月所有患者均接受鼻声反射和前鼻测压法检查,并采用鼻阻塞症状评估量表(NOSE)进行主观评估。对比两组患者术后客观及主观参数与术前的变化,并对其差异进行统计学分析。
A 组患者术后最小横截面积(MCA)和鼻腔容积(NV)均值及 NOSE 评分均明显高于术前,B 组患者术后 MCA、NV 和 NOSE 评分均值也明显高于术前。A、B 两组患者术后总鼻阻力(TNR)值均明显低于术前。与 A 组相比,B 组患者术前及术后 MCA、NV、TNR 和 NOSE 评分的均值差异更大。
下鼻甲射频消融联合鼻甲外扩术可改善下鼻甲肥大患者的鼻腔阻塞症状,提高治疗效果。