Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Department of Health, Nursing, Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, 17033, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;22(2):187-193. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01237-1. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
In 2004, Sweden had to allow virtually unlimited private alcohol imports from other EU countries. Purchases from abroad in addition to the sales from Systembolaget stores (Sweden's alcohol retail monopoly) are a significant source of alcohol consumption in southern Sweden. However, survey studies designed to measure the expected increase in overall alcohol consumption in southern Sweden failed to detect a meaningful change. Since this was considered 'puzzling', this study aims to (at least partially) provide an explanation for this finding by testing an economic proposition, i.e., a coincidental and sudden increase in petrol prices reduced the affordability of private alcohol imports.
Using monthly sales at the provincial level covering Jan 1997-Dec 2005 for beer and spirits, we employed a fixed-effect panel design. Two models were examined: (i) a model investigating the relationship between distance, petrol prices and alcohol sales before the liberalization, and (ii) a model investigating this relationship after the liberalization.
The model before the liberalization showed, as expected, that domestic alcohol sales decrease when petrol prices decrease. However, the model after the liberalization model revealed that the effect of petrol prices on beer sales depends on the (traveling) distance from the borders and, after full liberalization, the coefficients for petrol prices become positive. For spirits, the results were inconclusive.
In the aftermath of import liberalization of the Swedish alcohol market, increased petrol prices temporarily made private alcohol imports economically unattractive for consumers living close to the border. This may partly explain why, after that event, surveys did not detect the widely expected increase in self-reported alcohol consumption.
2004 年,瑞典不得不允许从其他欧盟国家进口几乎无限量的私人酒精。除了 Systembolaget 商店(瑞典的酒精零售垄断企业)的销售之外,从国外购买的酒类是瑞典南部酒精消费的一个重要来源。然而,旨在衡量瑞典南部整体酒精消费预期增长的调查研究未能发现有意义的变化。由于这被认为是“令人费解的”,因此本研究旨在(至少部分地)通过检验一个经济命题来为这一发现提供解释,即汽油价格的意外和突然上涨降低了私人酒精进口的可负担性。
使用涵盖 1997 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月的省级月度销售数据,我们采用固定效应面板设计。检验了两个模型:(i)一个模型调查了自由化前距离、汽油价格和酒精销售之间的关系,(ii)一个模型调查了自由化后的关系。
自由化前的模型如预期所示,国内酒精销售随着汽油价格的下降而减少。然而,自由化后的模型显示,汽油价格对啤酒销售的影响取决于边境的(旅行)距离,并且在完全自由化后,汽油价格的系数变为正值。对于烈酒,结果尚无定论。
在瑞典酒精市场进口自由化之后,汽油价格的上涨使得靠近边境的消费者在经济上对私人酒精进口变得缺乏吸引力。这可能部分解释了为什么在这一事件之后,调查没有发现普遍预期的自我报告酒精消费的增长。