Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 May;37(5):854-9. doi: 10.1111/acer.12065. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
Alcohol beverage prices or taxes have been shown to be related to alcohol sales and use and related problems. What is not clear are the mechanisms underlying these relationships.
This study examines the relationship between alcohol outlet density under conditions of the partial privatization of off-premise consumption in British Columbia (BC) occurring over the past decade. Two hypotheses are tested. First, reflecting basic supply-demand principles, greater geographic densities of alcohol outlets will be directly related to reductions in beverage prices in response to greater competition. Second, reflecting the effects of niche marketing and resulting market stratification, increased densities of private liquor stores will be especially related to reductions in beverage prices within this outlet category. Data were collected from: (i) a survey of BC private store prices and practices, (ii) alcohol outlet location information, and (iii) data on demographic characteristics. Multilevel models examine the relationships between prices at individual private liquor stores and the densities of government liquor stores, private liquor stores, bars, and restaurants, controlling for background demographics and geographic unit level effects. Spatial dependencies were also examined.
Increased densities of private liquor stores were associated with lower mean prices of beer and all alcohol aggregated across brands at the store level. There appeared to be no outlet level effect on discounting patterns, however, with the mean price differences apparently reflecting differences in the quality of brands carried rather than unequal prices for any given brand.
Increased densities of private off-sale alcohol outlets appear to result in lower prices charged at said establishments independently of other types of alcohol outlets suggesting that they represent an emerging marketing niche in the context of off-sale outlet privatization.
已有研究表明,酒精饮料价格或税收与酒精销售和使用以及相关问题之间存在关联。但这些关系的背后机制尚不清楚。
本研究考察了过去十年不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)非现场消费部分私有化过程中酒类销售点密度与酒精相关问题之间的关系。本研究检验了两个假设。首先,反映基本的供求原则,酒类销售点的地理密度越大,竞争加剧导致的饮料价格下降幅度越大。其次,反映利基营销的影响和由此产生的市场分层,私营酒类专卖店密度的增加将与该销售点类别的饮料价格降低特别相关。数据来自:(i)BC 私营酒类商店价格和做法调查,(ii)酒类销售点位置信息,以及(iii)人口统计特征数据。多水平模型检验了个别私营酒类专卖店的价格与政府酒类专卖店、私营酒类专卖店、酒吧和餐馆密度之间的关系,控制了背景人口统计数据和地理单元水平的影响。还检查了空间依赖性。
私营酒类专卖店密度的增加与酒类专卖店层面的啤酒和所有品牌酒精的平均价格降低有关。然而,在折扣模式方面似乎没有销售点水平的影响,平均价格差异显然反映了所售品牌质量的差异,而不是同一品牌的不等价格。
私营非现场酒类销售点密度的增加似乎导致了这些场所的价格降低,这独立于其他类型的酒类销售点,表明它们在非现场销售点私有化的背景下代表了一个新兴的营销利基。