Li Yi-Chen, Wang Rong, Xu Hang, Ding Lan-Ping, Ge Wei-Hong
Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 16;11:549253. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.549253. eCollection 2020.
Anticoagulation is essential for patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement; however, the timing to reinitiate the anticoagulant could be a dilemma that imposes increased risk for bleeding events in patients suffering from the life-threatening hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after ischemic stroke. Such a situation was presented in this case report. A 71-year-old woman was transferred directly to the Neurocritical Care Unit because of a HT that occurred following the mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. Since she had a history of prosthetic metallic valve replacement, how the anticoagulating therapy could balance the hemorrhagic and thrombotic risks was carefully evaluated. On day 6 after the onset of hemorrhage transformation, the laboratory results of coagulation and fibrinolysis strongly suggested thrombosis as well as antithrombin deficiency. The short-acting and titratable anticoagulant argatroban was immediately initiated at low dose, and thrombosis was temporarily terminated. On day 3 of anticoagulation resumption, argatroban was discontinued for one dose when the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time significantly prolonged after argatroban infusion. Aortic valve thrombosis was detected the next day. The anticoagulation was then strengthened by dose adjustment to keep mitral valve intact, to stabilize the aortic valve thrombosis, and to decrease the aortic flow rate. The intravenous argatroban was transited to oral warfarin before the patient was discharged. This study is the first report of administering argatroban and titrating to its appropriate dose in the patient with valve thrombosis, antithrombin deficiency, and HT after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Notably, the fluctuations argatroban brings to the coagulation test results might not be interpreted as increased bleeding risk. This case also suggested that the reported timing (day 6 to day 14 after hemorrhage) of anticoagulant resumption in primary intracerebral hemorrhage with mechanical valves might be late for some patients with HT.
抗凝治疗对于接受机械心脏瓣膜置换术的患者至关重要;然而,重新开始使用抗凝剂的时机可能是一个两难问题,对于缺血性中风后发生危及生命的出血性转化(HT)的患者,这会增加出血事件的风险。本病例报告就呈现了这样一种情况。一名71岁女性因缺血性中风机械取栓术后发生HT而被直接转入神经重症监护病房。由于她有金属人工瓣膜置换史,因此仔细评估了抗凝治疗如何平衡出血和血栓形成风险。出血转化发生后的第6天,凝血和纤维蛋白溶解的实验室结果强烈提示存在血栓形成以及抗凝血酶缺乏。立即开始以低剂量使用短效且可滴定的抗凝剂阿加曲班,血栓形成暂时得到控制。在恢复抗凝治疗的第3天,输注阿加曲班后凝血酶原时间和活化部分凝血活酶时间显著延长,停用了一剂阿加曲班。第二天检测到主动脉瓣血栓形成。随后通过调整剂量加强抗凝治疗,以保持二尖瓣完好,稳定主动脉瓣血栓形成,并降低主动脉流速。在患者出院前,将静脉注射阿加曲班转换为口服华法林。本研究是关于在急性缺血性中风机械取栓术后合并瓣膜血栓形成、抗凝血酶缺乏和HT的患者中使用阿加曲班并滴定至合适剂量的首例报告。值得注意的是,阿加曲班给凝血试验结果带来的波动可能不能被解释为出血风险增加。该病例还提示,对于一些HT患者,原发性脑出血合并机械瓣膜时报告的抗凝恢复时机(出血后第6天至第14天)可能较晚。