Benz-Schwarzburg Judith, Monsó Susana, Huber Ludwig
Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal Studies, Messerli Research Institute, Vetmeduni Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Unit of Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, Vetmeduni Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:584037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584037. eCollection 2020.
Humans interact with animals in numerous ways and on numerous levels. We are indeed living in an "animal"s world,' in the sense that our lives are very much intertwined with the lives of animals. This also means that animals, like those dogs we commonly refer to as our pets, are living in a "human's world" in the sense that it is us, not them, who, to a large degree, define and manage the interactions we have with them. In this sense, the human-animal relationship is nothing we should romanticize: it comes with clear power relations and thus with a set of responsibilities on the side of those who exercise this power. This holds, despite the fact that we like to think about our dogs as human's best friend. Dogs have been part of human societies for longer than any other domestic species. Like no other species they exemplify the role of companion animals. Relationships with pet dogs are both very widespread and very intense, often leading to strong attachments between owners or caregivers and animals and to a treatment of these dogs as family members or even children. But how does this relationship look from the dogs' perspective? How do they perceive the humans they engage with? What responsibilities and duties arise from the kind of mutual understanding, attachment, and the supposedly "special" bonds we form with them? Are there ethical implications, maybe even ethical implications beyond animal welfare? The past decades have seen an upsurge of research from comparative cognition on pet dogs' cognitive and social skills, especially in comparison with and reference to humans. We will therefore set our discussion about the nature and ethical dimensions of the human-dog relationship against the background of the current empirical knowledge on dog (social) cognition. This allows us to analyze the human-dog relationship by applying an interdisciplinary approach that starts from the perspective of the dog to ultimately inform the perspective of humans. It is our aim to thereby identify ethical dimensions of the human-dog relationship that have been overlooked so far.
人类与动物在诸多方面和层次上相互作用。从我们的生活与动物的生活紧密交织的意义上来说,我们确实生活在一个“动物的世界”里。这也意味着,像我们通常称为宠物的那些狗,从某种意义上说,它们也生活在一个“人类的世界”里,因为在很大程度上,是我们而非它们来定义和管理我们与它们之间的互动。从这个意义上讲,人与动物的关系并非我们应该浪漫化的东西:它伴随着明确的权力关系,因此对行使这种权力的一方而言也伴随着一系列责任。尽管我们喜欢把狗视为人类最好的朋友,但情况依然如此。狗成为人类社会的一部分的时间比其他任何家养物种都要长。它们比其他任何物种都更能体现伴侣动物的角色。与宠物狗的关系既广泛又紧密,常常导致主人或照料者与动物之间产生强烈的情感纽带,并将这些狗当作家庭成员甚至孩子来对待。但从狗的角度来看,这种关系是怎样的呢?它们如何看待与自己互动的人类?我们与它们形成的那种相互理解、情感纽带以及所谓的“特殊”关系会产生哪些责任和义务?是否存在伦理影响,甚至是超出动物福利范畴的伦理影响?在过去几十年里,来自比较认知领域的关于宠物狗认知和社交技能的研究大量涌现,尤其是与人类进行比较并以人类为参照的研究。因此,我们将在当前关于狗(社会)认知的实证知识背景下,展开对人与狗关系的本质及伦理维度的讨论。这使我们能够通过一种跨学科方法来分析人与狗的关系,该方法从狗的视角出发,最终为人类的视角提供参考。我们的目标是借此识别出迄今为止被忽视的人与狗关系的伦理维度。