Lea Stephen E G, Osthaus Britta
Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
School of Psychology, Politics and Sociology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, CT1 1QU, UK.
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):335-363. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0349-7.
The great increase in the study of dog cognition in the current century has yielded insights into canine cognition in a variety of domains. In this review, we seek to place our enhanced understanding of canine cognition into context. We argue that in order to assess dog cognition, we need to regard dogs from three different perspectives: phylogenetically, as carnivoran and specifically a canid; ecologically, as social, cursorial hunters; and anthropogenically, as a domestic animal. A principled understanding of canine cognition should therefore involve comparing dogs' cognition with that of other carnivorans, other social hunters, and other domestic animals. This paper contrasts dog cognition with what is known about cognition in species that fit into these three categories, with a particular emphasis on wolves, cats, spotted hyenas, chimpanzees, dolphins, horses, and pigeons. We cover sensory cognition, physical cognition, spatial cognition, social cognition, and self-awareness. Although the comparisons are incomplete, because of the limited range of studies of some of the other relevant species, we conclude that dog cognition is influenced by the membership of all three of these groups, and taking all three groups into account, dog cognition does not look exceptional.
本世纪对犬类认知研究的大幅增加,已在多个领域对犬类认知有了深入了解。在本综述中,我们试图将对犬类认知的深入理解置于相应背景中。我们认为,为了评估犬类认知,需要从三个不同角度看待犬类:从系统发育角度看,它们是食肉动物,特别是犬科动物;从生态角度看,它们是群居、善于奔跑的猎手;从人类影响角度看,它们是家畜。因此,对犬类认知的有原则的理解应包括将犬类的认知与其他食肉动物、其他群居猎手以及其他家畜的认知进行比较。本文将犬类认知与符合这三类的物种的已知认知进行对比,特别着重于狼、猫、斑鬣狗、黑猩猩、海豚、马和鸽子。我们涵盖了感官认知、物理认知、空间认知、社会认知和自我意识。尽管由于对其他一些相关物种的研究范围有限,这些比较并不完整,但我们得出结论,犬类认知受到这三类所有成员的影响,综合考虑这三类,犬类认知并无特别之处。