Wang Tongbo, Chen Yingtai, Zhao Lulu, Zhou Hong, Wu Chaorui, Zhang Xiaojie, Zhou Aiping, Jin Jing, Zhao Dongbing
Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;12(2):379-386. doi: 10.7150/jca.46847. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant therapies (NAT) on patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). This study retrospectively analyzed LAGC patients treated at the China National Cancer Center between October 2006 and December 2018. All patients included were divided into two groups, NAT followed by surgery (NAT-Surgery) and adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery (Surgery-ACT). Subgroup analysis compared between patients underwent either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) was conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to reduce selection bias. In total, 2779 patients were included in this study (494 of NAT-Surgery group and 2285 of Surgery-ACT group). After PSM, the patients in NAT-Surgery group had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients in Surgery-ACT group (<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequently observed in nCRT group during neoadjuvant treatment (52.0% in nCRT group vs. 34.0% in nCT group, =0.010). Pathological complete response (pCR) being achieved in 17.0% after nCRT versus 4.0% after nCT (<0.001). Patients of the nCRT group obtained better disease-free survival (DFS, =0.024) and local-recurrence-free survival (LRFS, =0.014) than patients in nCT group, while there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups. In conclusion, NAT improved survival outcomes among LAGC patients over surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In comparison with nCT, nCRT resulted in higher pCR rate, better DFS and LRFS, without significantly affecting OS.
本研究旨在评估新辅助治疗(NAT)对局部进展期胃癌(LAGC)患者的疗效。本研究回顾性分析了2006年10月至2018年12月在中国国家癌症中心接受治疗的LAGC患者。纳入的所有患者分为两组,即先进行新辅助治疗后手术(NAT-手术组)和手术后进行辅助化疗(手术-辅助化疗组)。对接受新辅助化疗(nCT)或新辅助放化疗(nCRT)的患者进行了亚组分析。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以减少选择偏倚。本研究共纳入2779例患者(NAT-手术组494例,手术-辅助化疗组2285例)。PSM后,NAT-手术组患者的总生存期(OS)显著长于手术-辅助化疗组(<0.001)。亚组分析显示,新辅助治疗期间nCRT组3/4级不良事件的发生率更高(nCRT组为52.0%,nCT组为34.0%,P=0.010)。nCRT后病理完全缓解(pCR)率为17.0%,nCT后为4.0%(<0.001)。nCRT组患者的无病生存期(DFS,P=0.024)和无局部复发生存期(LRFS,P=0.014)优于nCT组,而两组患者的OS无显著差异。总之,与手术后进行辅助化疗相比,NAT改善了LAGC患者的生存结局。与nCT相比,nCRT导致更高的pCR率、更好的DFS和LRFS,且未显著影响OS。