Yeh Jen-Hao, Yeh Yung-Sung, Tsai Hsiang-Lin, Huang Ching-Wen, Chang Tsung-Kun, Su Wei-Chih, Wang Jaw-Yuan
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Dachang Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;14(12):3026. doi: 10.3390/cancers14123026.
Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis with surgical resection alone, and neoadjuvant treatment has been recommended to improve surgical and oncological outcomes. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established to be effective for LAGC, the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains under investigation. Clinical experience and research evidence on esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (e.g., cardia gastric cancers) indicate that the likelihood of achieving sustainable local control is higher through NCRT than through resection alone. Furthermore, NCRT also has an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and adverse event profile. In particular, it increases the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and a pathological complete response (pCR). Moreover, NCRT results in higher overall and recurrence-free survival rates than surgery alone; however, evidence on the survival benefits of NCRT versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains conflicting. For noncardia gastric cancer, the efficacy of NCRT has mostly been reported in retrospective studies, and several large clinical trials are ongoing. Consequently, NCRT might play a more essential role in unresectable LAGC, for which NCT alone may not be adequate to attain disease control. The continual improvements in systemic treatments, radiotherapy techniques, and emerging biomarkers can also lead to improved personalized therapy for NCRT. To elucidate the contributions of NCRT to gastric cancer treatment in the future, the efficacy, potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers, and clinical considerations for implementing NCRT in different types of LAGC were reviewed.
局部进展期胃癌(LAGC)单纯手术切除预后较差,因此推荐进行新辅助治疗以改善手术和肿瘤学结局。尽管新辅助化疗已被证实对LAGC有效,但新辅助放化疗(NCRT)的作用仍在研究中。关于食管胃交界腺癌(如贲门胃癌)的临床经验和研究证据表明,通过NCRT实现可持续局部控制的可能性高于单纯手术切除。此外,NCRT的治疗相关毒性和不良事件情况也可接受。特别是,它增加了实现R0切除和病理完全缓解(pCR)的可能性。此外,NCRT导致的总生存率和无复发生存率高于单纯手术;然而,关于NCRT与新辅助化疗(NCT)生存获益的证据仍存在矛盾。对于非贲门胃癌,NCRT的疗效大多在回顾性研究中报道,目前有几项大型临床试验正在进行。因此,NCRT可能在不可切除的LAGC中发挥更重要的作用,仅NCT可能不足以实现疾病控制。全身治疗、放疗技术的不断改进以及新出现的生物标志物也可导致NCRT的个性化治疗得到改善。为了阐明NCRT在未来胃癌治疗中的贡献,本文综述了NCRT在不同类型LAGC中的疗效、潜在毒性、预测生物标志物以及临床考量。