Denniss A R, Ross D L, Richards D A, Holley L K, Cooper M J, Johnson D C, Uther J B
Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Australia.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Feb;11(2):276-83. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90092-7.
This study examined 65 patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation late after myocardial infarction to determine whether they differed with respect to duration of ventricular activation in sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia had a longer ventricular activation time in sinus rhythm than did patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation. This difference was detected with the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) (tachycardia 181 +/- 33 ms, fibrillation 152 +/- 23 ms, p less than 0.001) and at epicardial mapping (tachycardia 210 +/- 17 ms, fibrillation 192 +/- 17 ms, p less than 0.02). Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (0.22 +/- 0.09) than in patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation (0.27 +/- 0.09) (p less than 0.05). The patients with both spontaneous and inducible ventricular fibrillation had a shorter ventricular activation time on the signal-averaged ECG (129 +/- 17 ms) and a higher ejection fraction (0.36 +/- 0.05) than did either patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation and inducible ventricular tachycardia (158 +/- 21 ms and 0.25 +/- 0.08, respectively, each p less than 0.01) or patients with both spontaneous and inducible ventricular tachycardia (181 +/- 33 ms and 0.22 +/- 0.09, respectively, each p less than 0.001). Of the patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia, presentation with tachycardia rather than fibrillation was associated with a longer ventricular activation time on the signal-averaged ECG (181 +/- 33 versus 158 +/- 21 ms, p less than 0.02) and a longer cycle length of inducible ventricular tachycardia (290 +/- 61 versus 259 +/- 44 ms, p = 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究对65例心肌梗死后晚期出现室性心动过速或心室颤动的患者进行了检查,以确定他们在窦性心律时心室激动持续时间和左心室射血分数方面是否存在差异。自发性室性心动过速患者在窦性心律时的心室激动时间比自发性心室颤动患者更长。这种差异通过信号平均心电图(ECG)检测到(心动过速组为181±33毫秒,颤动组为152±23毫秒,p<0.001),在心外膜标测时也检测到(心动过速组为210±17毫秒,颤动组为192±17毫秒,p<0.02)。自发性室性心动过速患者的左心室射血分数(0.22±0.09)低于自发性心室颤动患者(0.27±0.09)(p<0.05)。同时有自发性和诱发性心室颤动的患者,其信号平均心电图上的心室激动时间更短(129±17毫秒),射血分数更高(0.36±0.05),这比自发性心室颤动合并诱发性室性心动过速的患者(分别为158±21毫秒和0.25±0.08,各p<0.01)或同时有自发性和诱发性室性心动过速的患者(分别为181±33毫秒和0.22±0.09,各p<0.001)都要低。在诱发性室性心动过速患者中,表现为心动过速而非颤动与信号平均心电图上更长的心室激动时间(181±33对158±21毫秒,p<0.02)以及诱发性室性心动过速更长的心动周期长度(290±61对259±44毫秒,p = 0.05)相关。(摘要截断于250字)