Suppr超能文献

验证接受家庭医疗护理的日本患者的自理能力、残疾和肌肉减少症的自我报告测量结果与护理需求水平的相关性:Zaitaku 评估计划和结果研究。

Validating care-needs level against self-reported measures of functioning, disability and sarcopenia among Japanese patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study.

机构信息

Medical Home Care Center, Tenri Hospital Shirakawa Branch, Tenri, Japan.

Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Feb;21(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14124. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to examine the validity of the care-needs levels classified in Japan's long-term care insurance system (LTCI-CNLs) when compared with patients' self-perceived functioning, disability and physical performance among patients receiving home medical care.

METHODS

This was a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan. Patients who were receiving continuous home medical care and who could respond to the questionnaire were enrolled in this study. In addition to the LTCI-CNLs, the 12-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and the SARC-F were used to measure functioning, disability and physical performance (sarcopenia). In addition, correlations and associations of the LTCI-CNLs with the WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F were analyzed using Spearman correlations and linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Data from 181 patients were included in the analyses. The LTCI-CNLs varied, ranging from support level 1 (5.5%) to care-needs level 5 (10.5%), with care-needs level 2 being the most prevalent (24.9%). Moderate correlations of the LTCI-CNLs with the WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F were found (ρ = 0.58 and 0.44, respectively). Although WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F scores varied within each LTCI-CNL, predicted WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F scores increased as LTCI-CNL increased. Dementia was not associated with WHODAS 2.0 or SARC-F.

CONCLUSIONS

The LTCI-CNLs was associated with self-reported functioning, disability and physical performance among home medical care patients. Future studies can use the LTCI-CNLs as an outcome variable for specific care approaches or as a proxy covariate for casemix status. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 229-237.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验在接受家庭医疗护理的患者中,与患者自我感知的功能、残疾和身体表现相比,日本长期护理保险系统(LTCI-CNLs)中分类的护理需求水平的有效性。

方法

这是一项在日本进行的多中心横断面研究。招募了正在接受连续家庭医疗护理且能够回答问卷的患者。除了 LTCI-CNLs 外,还使用 12 项世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)和 SARC-F 来衡量功能、残疾和身体表现(肌少症)。此外,使用 Spearman 相关分析和线性混合模型分析了 LTCI-CNLs 与 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 的相关性和关联。

结果

纳入了 181 名患者的数据进行分析。LTCI-CNLs 从支持水平 1(5.5%)到护理需求水平 5(10.5%)不等,护理需求水平 2 最为常见(24.9%)。LTCI-CNLs 与 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 之间存在中度相关性(ρ=0.58 和 0.44)。尽管每个 LTCI-CNL 中的 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 评分存在差异,但随着 LTCI-CNL 的增加,预测的 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 评分也会增加。痴呆与 WHODAS 2.0 或 SARC-F 无关。

结论

LTCI-CNLs 与家庭医疗护理患者的自我报告功能、残疾和身体表现相关。未来的研究可以将 LTCI-CNLs 用作特定护理方法的结果变量或作为病例组合状态的替代协变量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Rehabilitation services and related health databases, Japan.康复服务和相关健康数据库,日本。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Nov 1;100(11):699-708. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288174. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
Screening Tools for Sarcopenia.肌少症筛查工具。
In Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3001-3009. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12595.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验