Medical Home Care Center, Tenri Hospital Shirakawa Branch, Tenri, Japan.
Department of Public Health, Health Management and Policy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Feb;21(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14124. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
This study aimed to examine the validity of the care-needs levels classified in Japan's long-term care insurance system (LTCI-CNLs) when compared with patients' self-perceived functioning, disability and physical performance among patients receiving home medical care.
This was a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan. Patients who were receiving continuous home medical care and who could respond to the questionnaire were enrolled in this study. In addition to the LTCI-CNLs, the 12-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and the SARC-F were used to measure functioning, disability and physical performance (sarcopenia). In addition, correlations and associations of the LTCI-CNLs with the WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F were analyzed using Spearman correlations and linear mixed models.
Data from 181 patients were included in the analyses. The LTCI-CNLs varied, ranging from support level 1 (5.5%) to care-needs level 5 (10.5%), with care-needs level 2 being the most prevalent (24.9%). Moderate correlations of the LTCI-CNLs with the WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F were found (ρ = 0.58 and 0.44, respectively). Although WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F scores varied within each LTCI-CNL, predicted WHODAS 2.0 and SARC-F scores increased as LTCI-CNL increased. Dementia was not associated with WHODAS 2.0 or SARC-F.
The LTCI-CNLs was associated with self-reported functioning, disability and physical performance among home medical care patients. Future studies can use the LTCI-CNLs as an outcome variable for specific care approaches or as a proxy covariate for casemix status. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 229-237.
本研究旨在检验在接受家庭医疗护理的患者中,与患者自我感知的功能、残疾和身体表现相比,日本长期护理保险系统(LTCI-CNLs)中分类的护理需求水平的有效性。
这是一项在日本进行的多中心横断面研究。招募了正在接受连续家庭医疗护理且能够回答问卷的患者。除了 LTCI-CNLs 外,还使用 12 项世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)和 SARC-F 来衡量功能、残疾和身体表现(肌少症)。此外,使用 Spearman 相关分析和线性混合模型分析了 LTCI-CNLs 与 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 的相关性和关联。
纳入了 181 名患者的数据进行分析。LTCI-CNLs 从支持水平 1(5.5%)到护理需求水平 5(10.5%)不等,护理需求水平 2 最为常见(24.9%)。LTCI-CNLs 与 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 之间存在中度相关性(ρ=0.58 和 0.44)。尽管每个 LTCI-CNL 中的 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 评分存在差异,但随着 LTCI-CNL 的增加,预测的 WHODAS 2.0 和 SARC-F 评分也会增加。痴呆与 WHODAS 2.0 或 SARC-F 无关。
LTCI-CNLs 与家庭医疗护理患者的自我报告功能、残疾和身体表现相关。未来的研究可以将 LTCI-CNLs 用作特定护理方法的结果变量或作为病例组合状态的替代协变量。